Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cheelee

@Cheelee_EN

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

161,294subscribers

-729 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001750323403
TypeChannel
Username@Cheelee_EN
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cheelee_EN

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

161,294162,023161,658.57 August 2026 — 162,023 subscribers8 August 2026 — 161,872 subscribers9 August 2026 — 161,750 subscribers10 August 2026 — 161,628 subscribers11 August 2026 — 161,526 subscribers11 August 2026 — 161,431 subscribers12 August 2026 — 161,294 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -729. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 161,185–162,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:33161,294-137
11 Aug 2026, 23:05161,431-95
11 Aug 2026, 02:01161,526-102
10 Aug 2026, 01:41161,628-122
9 Aug 2026, 01:10161,750-122
8 Aug 2026, 00:54161,872-151
7 Aug 2026, 01:16162,023first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.68%
avg views ÷ 161,294 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,940
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.909%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held16 (25 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total17,830
Reactions total162
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

744 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42857.5%
👍12717.1%
🔥8411.3%
🤝314.17%
💯172.28%
🤩121.61%
🍾101.34%
🥰101.34%
60.806%
🌚50.672%
👀50.672%
🫡40.538%
😇20.269%
🤔20.269%
🎉10.134%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 744reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC≈4,140 views60 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🅰🔠🔠🔠 🅱🔠🔠🔠🔠 🎁 Hey, Cheelleer! 👋 One user decided to check out the Task Center just out of curiosity. Turned out the things they were already doing could earn them extra EASY coins — just by completing simple tasks. Finding it is easy: open the Balance screen and head to the Task Center. Daily activities and other ways to earn EASY are already waiting for you there — pick one, complete it, wait for verification, a

45👍8🤝4🍾3

23 Jul 2026, 11:08 UTC≈6,110 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Hey, Cheelleer! ✋ Be honest — how many hours have already slipped away today just scrolling short videos? 👀 Summer makes it even harder: sunshine, vacation mode, good vibes, and an endless stream of content. So why not turn that habit into something that actually works for you? If you want to get even more out of your watch time, now's a great moment to check out Smart glasses. And with promo c

28👍8🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC≈7,580 views64 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🌟 Hey, Cheelleer! 👋 Another month down — time to see how our community has been growing. June was a busy one: more people posting videos, connecting with each other, and building their profiles. The most interesting numbers are already waiting for you in the recap above. ✨ Fun fact: Many users start out just watching content — and somewhere along the way end up becoming creators themselves. Thanks

37🔥15💯64🥰2

6 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC≈8,340 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Hey, Cheelleer! ✋ You post a video, put real effort into it, and the views still don't come in the way you hoped. Honestly, it usually comes down to a few simple habits 👍 • Post consistently — that's how your audience starts finding you. • Stay active in the comments. A solid take or a good question can bring new people straight to your profile 💬 • What other creators are posting, take not

32👍11🔥3💯2👀1🤝1

24 Jun 2026, 11:36 UTC≈9,960 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🅰️🔠🔠🔠 🔠🅰️🔠🔠🔠🔠 Hey, Cheelleer! 👋 One user had been posting videos for a while but barely paid any attention to their profile. No photo, no bio - just videos, and that was it. Then they decided to add an avatar and spruced it up a bit 😮 After a while they noticed more followers coming in and their audience engaging more with the content. A complete profile builds trust, helps the algorithm get a better read on

50👍19🔥6🤩4🥰4🤔2🫡1

19 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC≈10,000 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠 🅰️🔠 🅱️🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠 🌟 Hey, Cheelleer! 🐸 Picture this: you post a video you actually love. It feels like it's got something, and you want to give it a real shot at reaching more people. That's exactly what Content Star is for ⭐ Choose a Star for a chance to boost your reach by up to 50%, 70%, or even 90% — and get a real shot at landing in recommendations. Sometimes one good video is all it takes for peo

24👍16🍾4🔥2👀1

18 Jun 2026, 16:22 UTC≈8,170 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Someone just messaged you claiming to be Cheelee support. What do you do? 🤔

  1. Send them a verification code10%
  2. Transfer funds to verify the account17%
  3. Check whether it's an official account69%
  4. Share your password to speed things up4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍169🔥5🤝5👀3

18 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTC≈7,200 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🅰️🔠🔠 🔠🔠 Hey, Cheelleer! 👋 Staying safe on Cheelee comes down to a few simple habits that are easy to forget in the day to day. 🚫 Never share your password or verification codes with anyone. If you use a crypto wallet — keep your seed phrase and access details to yourself, always. ✅ Before clicking any link, take a second to check where it came from and where it actually leads. 💬 If you have questions, only re

8👍7🤝5🍾2🔥1

16 Jun 2026, 07:41 UTC≈6,090 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

15🔥11👍9💯5🥰1

16 Jun 2026, 07:40 UTC≈6,970 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🅰️🔠🔠 Hey, Cheelleer! 😎 A lot of people think the badge is just a nice little icon next to their name. But it actually does a lot more than that. The biggest perk — a clickable link in your profile 👍 Add your social media, your channel, whatever project you're running, and share it directly with your audience. On top of that, a verified account stands out more in the feed and just feels more legit to

12🔥5🎉1

5 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC≈10,600 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🅰🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Hey, Cheelleer! 😊 May was another GROWTH month for Cheelee — all the key numbers on audience, user activity, and platform metrics are packed into the visual digest above. We keep growing alongside you, and every month shows just how much our community is evolving 💜 💡 Fun fact: in May, users started engaging with new content way more in the first few hours after it dropped. That helped videos reach t

39🤝10🔥8🌚5👍3

4 Jun 2026, 07:50 UTC≈8,720 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🅰🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Hey, Cheelleer! 👋 You know that feeling — you download a new app and then spend forever trying to figure out what to do next and when anything will actually happen. Cheelee hits different. Right after signing up you get Starting Glasses and can immediately start exploring how the platform works. Scroll the feed, open $LEE boxes, and watch the first results start rolling in 💰 That's e

19🔥2🥰2😇2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Cheelee_EN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jun 2026, 16:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz332 voters

Someone just messaged you claiming to be Cheelee support. What do you do? 🤔

  1. Send them a verification code10%
  2. Transfer funds to verify the account17%
  3. Check whether it's an official account69%
  4. Share your password to speed things up4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,453 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cheelee” (@Cheelee_EN), 161,294 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cheelee_EN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.