¿En nombre del progreso? ¿Progreso para quién?

Channel
Francesc Colet *CANAL*
@Charlas_Conscientes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
361subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001923344719 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Charlas_Conscientes |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Charlas_Conscientes |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 361 | +1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 360 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 359 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 360 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 361 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 361 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 55s
- Average length
- 1m 09s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Y ahora el gobierno woke español, buenista y acogedor, va a darles un lugar para que duerman, comida y agua, fuentes para cargar sus móviles… después papeles, pagas. ropa.., ¡todo de lo más normal! No me extraña que quieran venir en masa miles y miles de personas. Las puertas están abiertas en España.
😡4😭3
¿Cuánto tiempo falta para que Ceuta sea totalmente marroquí?
¿Crees que el futuro será tan verde como nos lo pintan?
Sobre los incendios… más claro no se puede decir!
https://youtu.be/WfiY5CrUhvo
¡La misma notícia en todas las cadenas de TV al mismo tiempo! Sé que es terrible, denunciable y mortal, pero el MIEDO y el DOLOR que se propaga en TODOS los medios de comunicación, es alimento para los que lo producen. ¡Es muy difícil no sucumbir ante ellos!
¿Conoces la cascada yatrogénica? O lo que es lo mismo: protocolos de fármacos al primer síntoma. ¿Sabes a qué te conduce ello?
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8JuKEej En el tema incendios, más claro no se puede decir: “Se necesitan más cabras en el monte y menos cabrones en los despachos”
🔥4
Que fort! Se’ls hi va escapar o no preveien aquest gran repàs als periodistes en directe! No deixeu de veure a la Juana Dolores, perquè no s’ha vist res igual a cap TV! https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN8JHAEQM/
🥰2
Un poco de filosofia va bien entre tanto tiempo conflictivitat.
https://youtu.be/Bsp43HWS51Y
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Charlas_Conscientes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@GroupHelp · 57,039
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Francesc Colet *CANAL*” (@Charlas_Conscientes), 361 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Charlas_Conscientes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.