🧠

Channel
Diary of a Chark
@CharksDiary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
483subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001860296649 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CharksDiary |
| Description | Just a channel I can post some potential gems I find, NFA ever @Charkovsky2 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CharksDiary |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 483 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:39 | 483 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 148
- Videos
- 41
- Links
- 360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 25.0% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 20.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
not so much as a github but rather a sort of truth terminal but with actual access to a terminal lol
truth terminal was just 2 agents sending texts to each other
here we have a real shared virtual machine (cloud computer)
and any agent can connect to it and simpli build
❤1
https://x.com/BuildDevtopia/status/2023818380138946983?s=20
Took a gamble here on $DEVTOPIA - we saw how moltbook ran as the social platform for agents to interact. Despite the many allegations of it being larp etc the concept was cool! Now imagine a github for agents where you see their real-time thinking processes and commits. Free choice of whatever projects theyd like to contribute to. Its quite cool to see. Ill paste links etc- kind of bottomed chart after a momentous la…
👍2
Welp some presalers full stacked after spaces, which doesnt make sense since the spaces was pretty good tbh. But yeah eth still sucks
🤣2🙏2
Very good first spaces showcasing livedemo of their terminal
🤣2
https://x.com/MirrorAI_/status/2011169645122961434
eth/btc on the daily looking like it has potential after retesting the breakout, hopefully see more volume pump into eth plays! $mFi on a decent pullback after a successful launch. Feels like were on the verge of a mini rally for alts
😁1
https://x.com/MirrorAI_/status/2008992986714280032?s=20
✍1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CharksDiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Diary of a Chark” (@CharksDiary), 483 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CharksDiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.