Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
:]
@ChallengeMizarimInja
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004307572850 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChallengeMizarimInja |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 3 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChallengeMizarimInja |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 1 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4620.0%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 46.2
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.19%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 924 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
☆ C++ آدم وقتی تابع main* این زبان رو میبینه یکم میترسه چون براش گنگه، ولی وقتی زمان میگذره میبینه اتفاقا این زبان انقدر خوبه که میتونه یکی از موردعلاقههاش باشه. صبرت بالاست، مثل صبر پروگرمرِ c++ وقتی سینتکس ارورهای* کدش رو میگیره و این صبرت خیلی به رشتهای که میخونی میاد. و مرسی که خیلی وقتها کلی لبخند برای من ساختی. :> *تابع اصلی یا main function اولین تابع این زبانه و قلب برنامهست. داخل تقریبا تمام کدهای استان…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
☆ Java مهم نیست کدی که میخوام چقدر پیچیده و وحشتناکه، میدونم که میتونم با جاوا بزنمش، و تو سر همین جاوایی. از پس هرچیزی برمیای و میدونم میتونم بهت اعتماد کنم. مرسی که تکیهگاهی :)) 🤍 ● To my dear @light_064
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
☆ Terminal + Coffee شما چون عزیز کوچک مایی، دوتا داری. :)) نه خواستهی خودت رو زیاد میپیچونی، نه خواستهی دیگران رو. کوتاه حرف میزنی و راحت متوجه میشی و سریع کار آدم رو راه میندازی. ولی قلب کامپیوتری. آدم بهتره یاد بگیره باهات کنار بیاد، وگرنه بخش زیادی از ماجرا رو از دست داده. دقیقا هم همون قهوهای هستی که آدم وقتی شب تا صبح باید پای لپتاپ بشینه بهش پناه میبره. همونقدر نجاتدهندهای عزیزم، همونقدر انرژی کل تیم رو ت…
Sticker, posted without a caption
☆ HTML این یکی چلنجینگ بود =) بهت html رو دادم چون حس کردم نمیخوای منطق بسازی یا زیبا کنی یا هرچی، فقط میخوای به چیزها یکم نظم بدی و مطمئن شی هرچی سر جای خودشه. یا مهمتر، مطمئن شی هرچیزی حداقل یه جایی برای خودش داره. سادهترین کدی برای یاد گرفتن ولی به اندازهی راحت بودنت، مهمی. اگه نباشی کل صفحه به هم میریزه. و چون همکاری به زبون خودمون شوخی میکنم. امیدوارم هیچوقت سمیکالن آخر کدت یادت نره :< 🤍 ● To my dear @MtFu…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
☆ JavaScript از خود جیاس، جیاستری :)) روی یه خط صاف پیش نمیری، خیلی جاها حتی خودت متوجه نمیشی داری چیکار میکنی، طرز کارت یکم عجیبه، اونی که ده ساله باهات کار میکنه هم صد درصد نمیفهمه چه اتفاقی ممکنه بیفته ولی درنهایت بهترین و بامزهترین ایدهها برای خودتن و هیچکس نمیتونه انقدر تمیز اجراشون کنه. من که زیاد نمیشناسم ولی امیدوارم کسی با من موافق باشه که پر از خلاقیت و کدهای دیوانهوار با نتایج محشری. :)) درسته تایپت…
Sticker, posted without a caption
☆ Python والا زیاد که نتونستم چیزی پیدا کنم چون چنلت یکم خلوته هنوز، ولی تا جایی که دیدم حدس میزنم زیاد از منطق و ساز و کار چیزهایی که هست خوشت نیاد، بیشتر درگیر زندگی بخشیدن به چیزهایی که نیست باشی، پس پایتون و خصوصا مبحث abstract methods/classes* برای توعه. اگه نوشتههات هم همین حس رو دارن که امیدوارم یه روز فیکشنهات به دستم برسه و بخونم :> *متدها/کلاسهای انتزاعی یا abstract methods/classes متدها یا کلاسهایی هس…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ChallengeMizarimInja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 550,201 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@light_064 · 251 postlosing you
@MtFuckingLife · 61 postMy Ibasho🙂🌈✨🩵
@My_Ibasho · 331 postǝʞɐꓶ ssǝNɥɔoꓶ (فنکلاب نینی)
@NESIIIZMESSY · 131 postVɒ
@Ssaorise · 391 postWe can live forever if you got the time🏳🌈🏳⚧
@starsonherhairs · 1931 postYy
@TheEndhawks · 11 postthe moon and my man 🪻
@thehyacinthlabyrinth · 6681 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“:]” (@ChallengeMizarimInja), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChallengeMizarimInja.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.