Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Chainbase Announcement

@ChainbaseHQ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

152subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001982516128
TypeChannel
Username@ChainbaseHQ
DescriptionWe're more than APIs, or just data interpretation. Customize your own data flow with Chainbase.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 27 July 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ChainbaseHQ

Growth

1527 Aug 2026, 14:58 — 152 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:17 — 152 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:588 Aug 2026, 19:17
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:17152no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:58152first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1242.9%
1139.3%
🔥310.7%
👎13.57%
🥰13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2023 to 10 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jan 2024, 02:15 UTC≈2,720 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ Polygon & Fantom Node Outage ⚠️ Due to ongoing server changes, there is currently an issue with the Polygon & Fantom nodes, rendering them temporarily unavailable. This outage will also affect the functionality of DataCloud. If you experience any issues with your queries, please be patient as we work to resolve the problem.

👍5

25 Dec 2023, 10:35 UTC≈2,710 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ zkSync Chain RPC no new data produced ⚠️ Due to issues with ZkSync official nodes, Chainbase's zkSync Chain RPC is currently unable to provide services as usual. For more details, please check our status page: https://status.chainbase.com/. Our engineers are actively communicating with the official team and will address this matter as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience, and everything will be back to

👍2👎1

21 Dec 2023, 07:18 UTC≈1,810 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ Data Cloud V2 Upgrade ⚠️ DataCloud v2 is undergoing a version upgrade, which may result in query failures. The process is expected to take 10-15 minutes. Please try again later. ✅ UPDATED ✅

2

7 Dec 2023, 03:22 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ATTENTION⚠️ BSC Data Lag Due to a sudden surge in BSC request pressure, the BSC node experienced a 20-minute outage. After our emergency repairs, the node has now returned to normal operation. There might be a lag in data for a while, so please be patient as it catches up to the latest blocks. ✅ UPDATE ✅ This is resolved now

6 Dec 2023, 09:43 UTC≈1,190 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Have you got the 📧 👉Chainbase November newsletter? Highlights:💡 💜New DataCloud (Alpha) launched 🎉 🧡New Datasets available 💙Completed and upcoming events and more!!! Check out our latest blog! 🔗https://chainbase.com/blog/article/chainbase-november-newsletter

👍1🔥1

4 Dec 2023, 16:32 UTC781 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥Big news!! 🚀 We launched the all-new Data Cloud Studio!! 3 Major Upgrades: 🥒 Unified Datasets 🐟 Parameterized Queries ☀️ Task API Check out the details and try it now!!! ⤵️ https://chainbase.com/blog/article/new-data-cloud-is-on-better-studio-for-web3-data

1🥰1

28 Nov 2023, 09:16 UTC595 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Important Update ⚠️⚠️⚠️ BSC Network Synchronization Issue Dear Chainbase Community Members, We wish to inform you that our Data Cloud product is currently facing a synchronization issue with the BSC mainnet. A known bug in the BSC network client Erigon (details can be found here: https://github.com/node-real/bsc-erigon/issues/254 ) has resulted in our inability to retrieve the latest BSC mainnet trace data, i

👍2

15 Nov 2023, 04:31 UTC470 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Say hi to our DevRel, Product, Growth, BD, engineers, in Istanbul 🇹🇷 ! 🗓️ November 13-17th 🗺️ Check out the Chainbase's footprint here! 🙌

🔥1

9 Nov 2023, 00:35 UTC424 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GM our devs!! Are you going to EFDevconnect 🇹🇷? Chainbase and KYVE Network are partnering up to host a full-day event OpenDataGünü dedicated to Web3 data! With strategic support from IOSG Ventures 🎆 📅 November 17th, 10:00 to 18:00 GMT+3 🔖 DeFi, oracle, MEV, L2, on-chain identity, AA…and more! 🏝️ Bonus point: a chill-out zone to recharge with free swags, hardware wallets, and exclusive POAP 🦄 Check out the program

3👍1

20 Oct 2023, 04:29 UTC341 viewsread 8 August 2026

GM Chainbase builders 🔥 Join us for a week-long global hackathon hosted by our Chainbase and Developer DAO!!! 🗓️ From 10/23 00:00AM UTC to 10/30 12:59PM UTC 🏆 $5k+ & CODE tokens 🗺️ Online 🔗Sign up now https://devdao.to/chainbase-hackathon And check out details in this blog 🔗 https://chainbase.com/blog/article/chainbase-unveils-exciting-partnership-with-developer-dao-for-a-week-long-global-hackathon

26 Sept 2023, 04:44 UTC325 viewsread 8 August 2026

👋 #EveryDevNeedsDATA We strongly recognize the blockchain built by TON for large-scale Web3 applications. To serve massive developers and end users, Chainbase will provide: 💐 Data Indexing Product ☀️ Node Deployment Service on Ton blockchain! 🎉 🔗https://chainbase.com/chainNetwork/TON 🔗https://chainbase.com/blog/article/empowering-web3-adoption-chainbase-and-ton-foundation-join-forces 🔗https://docs.chainbase.com/r

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ChainbaseHQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 848,347 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chainbase Announcement” (@ChainbaseHQ), 152 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChainbaseHQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.