Channel
@CertikAlert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001779642978 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CertikAlert |
| Description | This Channel is for Meme Coins which has submitted/Verfied by Certik. We do not have any coin/token. There is not any private group. Mod: @Snowyboy103134 |
| Created | 1 November 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CertikAlert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 42 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 42 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 1 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
🚨Smolinu: Chain: ETH CONTRACT: 0xd21a75e8200e4fc2ff2929d150a3f7219b1123c6 Certik Link: This is from Mod: Our aim is to get this sorted asap. We are trying to incorporate our NFT development into the audit first. We are hoping to have our tech up and running within two weeks!! Groups: http://t.me/smolinu http://smolinu.com Charts: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x114dd71371b7632a5da20d187afe736a…
🚨Psyduck inu: Chain: ETH CONTRACT: 0x442d0bfc4e1450d3a8b29d4397e94633bc6ed01e Certik Link: Onboarding Groups: https://t.me/psyduckinu https://psyduckinu.com/ Charts: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x60bb204e54baed029e84750d60b91c0c8839bb47
🚨BFK WARZONE: Chain: BSC CONTRACT: 0xed44623b06616bccec876617c124f5461bd5f79b Certik Link: Onboarding Groups: https://t.me/bfkwarzone Charts: https://www.dextools.io/app/bsc/pair-explorer/0xc6dc902af09e56cb82666785efcdc3d33e557776
🚨AKAMARU INU: Chain: ETH CONTRACT: 0x4abac7a6acf3ce84f1c2fa07d91e72cdd6081cd3 Certik Link: https://www.certik.org/projects/akamaru-inu Groups: https://t.me/AkamaruInuEntryPortal Charts: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x5b30bd6c94394b1f128a99afda8f1cb42e32f260
🚨Bebop Inu: Chain: ETH CONTRACT: 0x30f28b7859cb7f7a1439b1a35414c04f761e8f32 Certik Link: https://www.certik.org/projects/bebopinu Groups: https://t.me/bebopinu Charts: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x4469d6168330d0c64083d2f3191e46a2f2941ce1
🚨Namiinu: Chain: ETH CONTRACT: 0xe624a29cb327b03350820ef98584d56083eaf392 Certik Link: https://www.certik.org/projects/namiinu Groups: https://t.me/NamiInu Charts: https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x106dc1e3638ce6cb4d3bbad9f1288935fb8398a8
🚨Piccoloinu: Chain: ETH CONTRACT: 0x3a1311B8C404629E38f61D566cefEFed083B9670 Certik Link: https://www.certik.org/projects/piccoloinu Group: https://t.me/PiccoloInu
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @CertikAlert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 882,355 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CertikAlert named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Certik Alert (Meme)” (@CertikAlert), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CertikAlert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.