Looking to level up your company’s reputation? Choose the leaders in Reputation Management ⭐️ Our Top Services include: - Review Removals (Google, Indeed, Glassdoor, etc.) - Google DMCA/Deindexing (OnlyFans Models) - Facebook Review Removals - YouTube Video Removals - Twitter/X Post Removals (OnlyFans Models) - TikTok Profile/Video Removals - TikTok Username Claims - Instagram Username Claims - Snapchat Removals - L…

Channel
Cerestic's Services
@CeresticServices
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002055616290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CeresticServices |
| Created | 26 February 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CeresticServices |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 112 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 110 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 109 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 109 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 26 February 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ✏️PRESS SERVICE & TV PLACEMENTS Publish an article about yourself or your company! Get featured in Bloomberg, Forbes, NASDAQ, US Weekly, Mirror & 800+ Websites | Best PR Bundle 🙂 INSTAGRAM UNBANS If I can't unban - no one can. Price starts from $2k+ 🙂 INSTAGRAM CLAIMS (NON GENERIC / GENERIC) 🌐 TikTok Claims / TikTok Unbans 🐦 Twitter Unban Service 🌐 Facebook Unban Service / Facebook Spy 📱 REDDIT REMOV…
👑 INSTAGRAM UNBANS We can unban any reason 💎 GOOGLE KNOWLEDGE PANEL for individuals & business with or without press It is called the "cheaper Wikipedia" when it comes to verification LIMITED OFFER: TAT IS UNDER 48 HOURS INDIVIDUALS & BUSINESS GKP ✏️PRESS SERVICE & TV PLACEMENTS Publish an article about yourself or your company! Get featured in Bloomberg, Forbes, NASDAQ, US Weekly, Mirror & 800+ Websites | Best PR …
I will fast track your Twitter Gold application so that your account will be verified within a maximum of 72 hours. Any type of business account; nft, crypto, AI, car rental, restaurant, or anything else - I can do all of them! Requirements: — The account has to represent an actual Business. — The account needs to have a professional website in the bio. — The account needs a verified domain email linked. Price: $3,…
Tired of wasting time on sellers who can’t unban your Instagram account? You’ve come to the right place. If I can’t unban your account, nobody can 👑 This isn’t any funny business. I don’t spam a form hoping your account comes back, and I’m not using a “method” 🛡 💵 Prices depend on the amount of followers and ban reason, but send me a message to get quoted! However, prices start from $4.5k. So if you don’t have this…
🗝 Negative Airbnb Reviews Removals 🗝 💵$250 per review ⌛ Turnaround Time 48 hours No access needed All I need is your listing link and reservation codes
💎 Delete ALL Fake/Negative Google Reviews 💎 👑 FAST & NO GMB Access 💵 $900 per review = if purchasing between 1 to 5 review removals 💵 $800 per review = if purchasing more than 6 review removals (bulk) ⌛ Turnaround Time 0-8 days With unwavering assurance, I can confidently say that I am the sole provider in the market capable of guaranteeing swift turnarounds (0-7 business days) and a 100% success rate, all withou…
🌐 PRESS SERVICE & TV PLACEMENTS 🌐 We offer articles in the top magazines in the world, ensuring the best price and quality of articles! 👑 We are one of the few on the market to offer 750 press articles! Writing included ✔️ We also offer bundles ✔️ Contact me for links to all articles, prices and all updates. ✉️ Contact me: @cerestic ✉️ If you can't message me: CLICK HERE
🖥 GOOGLE KNOWLEDGE PANEL 🖥 ✔️ We can create Google Knowledge Panel and profile for individuals with or without press. ✍️ What is Google Knowledge Panel? The Google Knowledge Panel shows short information about things or famous people when you search on Google. These may support your case and provide more credibility for platform verification. 🔥 It is called the "cheaper Wikipedia" when it comes to verification 💵…
📎 WIKIPEDIA PAGE CREATION SERVICE 📎 We offer to create articles in three types of Wikipedia: English Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org) Price: $1500 Simple English Wikipedia (simple.wikipedia.org) Price: $900 Spanish Wikipedia (es.wikipedia.org) Price: $600 TAT 1-7 days Add MM fees to prices if needed. 🙂 Why us? It's easy! 8 years of experience, thousands of satisfied customers, we have developed so much that thanks …
Cerestic's Services pinned «ℹ️ Guide to the services I offer: ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🖥 Google Knowledge Panels ✏️ Press Service & TV placements 📎 Wikipedia 💎 Negative Google Review Removals 💎 Negative Airbnb Reviews Removals 🌐 Instagram Unbans 👑 Twitter Gold Badge Verification ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿…»
ℹ️ Guide to the services I offer: ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🖥 Google Knowledge Panels ✏️ Press Service & TV placements 📎 Wikipedia 💎 Negative Google Review Removals 💎 Negative Airbnb Reviews Removals 🌐 Instagram Unbans 👑 Twitter Gold Badge Verification ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ My vouches: t.me/checkmyvouches
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @CeresticServices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 159,492 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cerestic's Services” (@CeresticServices), 112 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CeresticServices.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.