Channel
@CentralPARemoteSupport
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
44subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001224435988 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CentralPARemoteSupport |
| Created | 14 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CentralPARemoteSupport |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 44 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 44 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 March 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 17 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Oh no!
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 1 month. If it remains inactive in the next 9 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Is anyone interested in starting a Food Not Bombs in Reading? There's some discussion on social media.
Hey so does anyone want to bother them and make lots of noise outside? 🥳 Seriously. These groups are organizing in our backyards. Talking about banning teaching about social conflicts like racism and sexism in schools. Talking about taking away our rights to a fair election. Talking about how to deal with leftists. Etc. They dont want us to exist and they want to rewrite the narrative taught in our history, science,…
Photo, posted without a caption
Kirstin Lord - Boyertown Area School District School Board is racist. Sign the petition to remove her https://www.change.org/p/boyertown-area-school-district-remove-kirstin-lord-from-the-boyertown-area-school-board
Lifegate PAC and Family Research Council has been politicizing Elizabethtown School Board positions to push bans on books teaching about concepts of race stratification such as To Kill a Mockingbird and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. To ban books on gender stratification like The Scarlett Letter. To ban the teaching of these topics in school including banning teaching these topics in History Class. At their meetings…
The Berks Patriot group has invited the Oathkeepers, a radical, anti-government group, to Berks County in mid-June. The notice on their website encourages people to join the group, which is scheduled to give a 4-hour presentation. Here’s what Wikipedia says about the Oathkeepers: “Several organizations that monitor U.S. domestic terrorism and hate groups describe the group as extremist or radical. The FBI describes t…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CentralPARemoteSupport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,104,433 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@CentralPARemoteSupport named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CentralPARUST” (@CentralPARemoteSupport), 44 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CentralPARemoteSupport.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.