https://t.me/+0VcCag1F351jMjk1

Channel
Celebs Face Card ๐๐
@CelebsFaceCard
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
13,296subscribers
+37 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002127631956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CelebsFaceCard |
| Description | ๐น Celebs Face Card is a channel based on close up pics of face ๐ Discover lusty face that spark desire without words. โจ Stay tuned for regular face close ups. @celebs_empire |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CelebsFaceCard |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 13,296 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 13,306 | -23 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 13,329 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 13,322 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 13,331 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 13,329 | +22 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 13,307 | +48 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 13,259 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 8.05%
- avg views รท 13,296 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,070
- 34 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.596%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 34
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (9 July 2026 โ 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 36,413 |
| Reactions total | 201 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 269
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 13
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 18 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
510 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 189 | 37.1% | |
| ๐ | 187 | 36.7% | |
| ๐ฅ | 62 | 12.2% | |
| ๐ | 59 | 11.6% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 6 | 1.18% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 4 | 0.784% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.392% | |
| ๐ญ | 1 | 0.196% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 510reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/+tUd6INz_2XRhMzg1
https://t.me/+jM6XZAjRLEc5ZGJk
https://t.me/+nFnu4t9ihJIzZDZl
https://t.me/addlist/-SW8YgdHnEczOGFl
https://t.me/+O1Uq-XldOxBmMTZl
https://t.me/+yG1OrU7_Wo84NTA9
https://t.me/+ACD9Y5PBe4wzMjQ1
https://t.me/+oEdvhFuzNzg3MjNl
https://t.me/addlist/-SW8YgdHnEczOGFl
๐๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ ๐๐ฏ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฌ โข โข ๐ ๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ข๐ก๐ง๐๐ก๐ง ๐ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐๐ โ ๏ธ โข โข ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐๐ฅ๐ โข โข ๐๐ @celebs_premium_bot ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฎ๐ฒ
โค4
https://t.me/+YGACD7skyndkMjcx
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @CelebsFaceCard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 304,716 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@celebs_empire ยท 23,9368 postsPremium Fantasies
@premiumfantasies ยท 2088 posts๐๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฎ.๐ฌ ๐๐
@AcTressSEditZz ยท 16,9001 post๐๐ช๐จ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ค๐ฃ๐จ ๐๐ผ
@MusskMelon ยท 23,3481 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โCelebs Face Card ๐๐โ (@CelebsFaceCard), 13,296 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CelebsFaceCard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.