Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Catlavan Client

Channel

Catlavan Client

@CatlavanDLC

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

23,251subscribers

+2,862 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002078940253
TypeChannel
Username@CatlavanDLC
DescriptionDiscord - https://discord.gg/catlavan-client Boost - https://t.me/boost/CatlavanDLC Site - https://catlavan.net/
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CatlavanDLC

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 5 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@catlavandevlogs/5613 Jul 2026, 01:58 UTC@CatlavanDLC/241 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 02:12 UTC1.0014 minutes
@CatlavanDLC/245 · this entry16 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC@catlavandevlogs/5916 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC1.00under a minute
@CatlavanDLC/251 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC@catlavandevlogs/6522 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@CatlavanDLC/255 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC@catlavandevlogs/6828 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@CatlavanDLC/251 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC@bravo317st/261122 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC1.00under a minute
@CatlavanDLC/255 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC@bravo317st/262728 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@catlavandevlogs10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (9–1)
@bravo317st12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9972 secondsthis entry (11–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 62 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 5 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @CatlavanDLC — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

20,38923,32121,85523,2517 August 202611 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 96 days, net +2,862. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,949–23,761 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 07:0723,251-67
9 Nov 2026, 10:3723,318-3
8 Nov 2026, 01:4723,321+12
6 Nov 2026, 20:1923,309+17
5 Nov 2026, 22:0523,292+57
4 Nov 2026, 20:3823,235+91
3 Nov 2026, 19:1623,144+409
2 Nov 2026, 15:3622,735+516
1 Nov 2026, 17:4522,219-22
31 Oct 2026, 15:4922,241-8
30 Oct 2026, 15:3022,249+6
29 Oct 2026, 11:5722,243+82
28 Oct 2026, 09:5422,161+35
26 Oct 2026, 06:2722,126+32
25 Oct 2026, 05:5822,094+20
24 Oct 2026, 09:0522,074+4
23 Oct 2026, 11:3722,070-29
22 Oct 2026, 10:2822,099-11
20 Oct 2026, 00:4622,110-17
19 Oct 2026, 01:3722,127first reading

Engagement

90 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.8%
avg views ÷ 23,251 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,710
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 90 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held90 (11 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total271,880
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
70
Videos
20
Links
143

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 08s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
744
across the posts below
Posts paid on
72
of 87 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CatlavanDLC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 90 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 09:28 UTC≈7,680 views0 reactions7 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Вторая часть обновления - УЖЕ В РЕЛИЗЕ! Можете играть и наслаждаться фармом AutoKeyFinder, Jesus и InventoryExploit Всё как и обещали, в общем за 2 обновления - больше 30 полезных строк обновления. 💰 CATLAVAN 1.21.11 - Лучший выбор на рынке. Промокод - CATLAVAN даёт 25% скидки при покупке 1.21.11 💵Купить чит на Сайте - https://catlavan.net/ 💸Купить чит на FunPay - https://funpay.com/users/9409827/

9 Nov 2026, 13:33 UTC≈4,540 views0 reactions7 Starsread 12 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

8 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC≈5,350 views0 reactions8 Starsread 12 November 2026

ПИШИ В КОММЕНТАРИЯХ ХОЧУ ЧИТ, ЛОГИН ДИСКОРДА ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО ЛАЙК И ТОГДА ТЫ ВЫИГРАЕШЬ ЛЮБОЙ ЧИТ НА 1.21.11 https://youtu.be/EPHjSh3fYuA

8 Nov 2026, 12:22 UTC≈6,610 views0 reactions100 Starsread 12 November 2026

CHANGE LOG - Catlavan Premium 1.21.11 / version 1.8 UPDATE: 08.11.2026 - ВТОРАЯ ЧАСТЬ ОБНОВЛЕНИЯ С AUTOKEYFINDER, НОВЫМ JESUS и так далее TOP ФУНКЦИИ: 1. [+] AutoKeyFinder - Вам нужно иметь /fly и донат Dragon, оно будет за вас летать и вскапывать все места, где лежат ценные ресурсы - "Красная ключ-карта" - "Зелёная ключ-карта" - "Синяя ключ-карта" - "Золотое яблоко" - "Зачарованное золотое яблоко" Это функция полно…

7 Nov 2026, 16:33 UTC≈5,760 views0 reactions51 Starsread 12 November 2026
Photo

💔 Приносим ещё раз свои извинения, что обновление пришлось поделить на две части и испортили для вас сюрприз. В честь извинений закидываем для Вас 5 ключей на активацию CATLAVAN Premium 1.21.11 ✅ Обновление готовилось сюрпризом для Вас, чтобы вы сразу прочувствовали всю красоту, и наисвежайшие обходы под ReallyWorld ⛏ Но мы всё равно подготовили для Вас TpKeyFinder и пару секретных функции. be0725e5-a867-40a7-8b12-…

7 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC≈5,040 viewsread 12 November 2026

Забыл дописать, что GuiMove новый режим обновлённый ReallyWorld ставьте для комфортной игры

7 Nov 2026, 07:53 UTC≈6,110 viewsread 12 November 2026

Вторая часть обновления будет залита либо СЕГОДНЯ вечером, либо завтра вечером.

7 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC≈6,150 viewsread 12 November 2026

Обновление было бы сразу на 30 строк залито, но из-за того что ReallyWorld сделал фикс анти-чита пришлось заливать вот такое обновление чтобы Вы смогли пока что нормально играть до второй части обновления. Извиняемся за это, но ReallyWorld поднасрали нам.

7 Nov 2026, 07:50 UTC≈6,340 views0 reactions16 Starsread 12 November 2026

CHANGE LOG - Catlavan Premium 1.21.11 / version 1.7 UPDATE: 07.11.2026 - МИНИ-ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ ФИКС АНТИЧИТА REALLYWORLD - ВЕЧЕРОМ ИЛИ ЗАВТРА ВТОРОЕ ДОПОЛНИТЕЛЬНОЕ ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ 1. [+] CrystalAura - полностью новая переписанная CrystalAura, перенастройте ибо она полностью отличается от старой - Чек-бокс "Якори" - Чек-бокс "Копать" - Минимальный урон - Максимальный самоурон 2. [+] NoSlow - Новый NoSlow New под ReallyWorld, чу…

3 Nov 2026, 10:19 UTC≈11,600 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Соскучились? 👋 ⚠️ Предыдущее обновление было на ЦЕЛЫХ 45 СТРОК! Мы продолжаем улучшать клиент функционально, визуально. Мы прислушиваемся к вам, и смотрим всегда на ваши идеи/баги на 😒 Discord сервере. В этом обновлений был добавлен: - Jesus и NoFall - это то, что нужно сейчас для обычных смертных игрокам, которые играют и не донатят. Про Вас мы не забываем - Рабочий Staff List на ReallyWorld - Обходы под DonutSMP …

Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @CatlavanDLC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @CatlavanDLC as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
24 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Catlavan Client” (@CatlavanDLC), 23,251 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CatlavanDLC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.