Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Catch me!

@CatchMe_band

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

91subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003824510331
TypeChannel
Username@CatchMe_band
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 17 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/CatchMe_band

Growth

918 Aug 2026, 04:16 — 91 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:01 — 91 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:169 Aug 2026, 14:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 90–92 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:0191no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:1691first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
299.8%
avg views ÷ 91 subscribers
Avg views / post
273
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held15 (17 May 20261 August 2026)
Views total2,455
Reactions total146
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Videos
11
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 06s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

269 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52965493315102696246624.5%
custom 53121263188994032156323.4%
🔥3814.1%
💘3412.6%
3011.2%
💋145.20%
💅72.60%
❤‍🔥62.23%
😁51.86%
🎉41.49%
👏10.372%
🙏10.372%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 269reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC103 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Кстати, стараемся потихоньку ввести систему с хештегами✨ надеемся что так будет удобнее!

custom 52965493315102696242custom 53121263188994032152

1 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC301 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Видео #выступление наконец-то есть‼️ Проблем хватает, но мы будем работать дальше чтобы стать лучше☁️

💘15custom 53121263188994032157😁5custom 529654933151026962452❤‍🔥2💋2🔥1

27 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC355 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 52965493315102696244custom 53121263188994032154💘2🔥2

18 Jul 2026, 14:34 UTC427 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🪦Это было очень весело! Для большей части нашей команды это был первый выход на сцену Аникона, и он явно того стоил🎵 Мы много фоткались и в целом круто провели время Были рады выступить на таком крупном мероприятии и будем ждать больше таких возможностей🫶 Видео выступления будет позже, когда выложат запись программы☁️

9💋4🔥3custom 52965493315102696242❤‍🔥1💘1custom 53121263188994032151

17 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC324 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Отстрелялись, бурмалдим💖

custom 53121263188994032158custom 529654933151026962461🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC310 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

До и брюнетки 3 номера😯

🔥6custom 52965493315102696245custom 53121263188994032152

17 Jul 2026, 07:39 UTC153 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Аникон 2024 VS Аникон 2026

custom 53121263188994032155💘2custom 52965493315102696242

17 Jul 2026, 06:33 UTC217 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

всем привет мы все опаздываем выжила только вайнона👽

🔥65custom 53121263188994032154💋2💘1custom 52965493315102696241

16 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC265 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ненавязчиво напоминаем что завтра мы выступаем в начале программы✨

🔥4custom 529654933151026962442custom 53121263188994032152💘1

10 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC324 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Смотрите какое видео про нас сделала Доомка!¡🐱 Что думаете, подходит?

custom 52965493315102696246🎉3custom 53121263188994032153💘21🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC374 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Такие маленькие девочки, а вон даже под дождем пляшут🥰🥰🥰 Чудесный состав, его бы по-хорошему отправить на аникон🙏🫰

custom 52965493315102696247💋42💘2custom 53121263188994032151

3 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC246 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Обновили анонс! ⭐

custom 53121263188994032153custom 529654933151026962421👏1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @CatchMe_band. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 171,171 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Catch me!” (@CatchMe_band), 91 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CatchMe_band.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.