Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘞𝘢𝘳

@Castlevania_War

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002148446138
TypeChannel
Username@Castlevania_War
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Castlevania_War

Growth

4811 Aug 2026, 11:47 — 48 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:51 — 48 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:4711 Aug 2026, 17:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–49 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:5148no change
11 Aug 2026, 11:4748first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.5%
avg views ÷ 48 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.9
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (4 July 202627 July 2026)
Views total659
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣853.3%
640.0%
👍16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🔺از تمامی دوستان عزیز که در این سیزن گیم ، مجددا با انرژی بی پایان مشارکت داشتند ، بسیار سپاسگزاریم از صبر و همراهی کامل شما عزیزان و حمایت شما دوستان گل واقعا ممنونیم نتایج آخرین جنگ های این سیزن نیز بارگزاری شده و پایان سیزن به این ترتیب اعلام میگردد

2

27 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC42 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🟡•- عراق با تکیه بر برتری کامل هوایی و آتش‌بار توپخانه‌ای سنگین، عملیات زمینی خود را با یک بمباران تهیه گسترده و ویرانگر با استفاده از بمب‌افکن‌های استراتژیک و جنگنده‌های تهاجمی بر روی خطوط پیشروی اعتلاف آغاز می‌کند. بمب‌های سنگین و هدایت لیزری ، قوای زرهی. و پیاده نظام اعتلاف غربی را با خاک یکسان کرده و با ایجاد دهانه‌های عریض و انفجارهای زنجیره‌ای، ساختار ترکیبی را از ریشه متلاشی می‌سازند. توپخانه‌های خودکششی عراق

27 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC37 viewsread 11 August 2026

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🚙•°[بخش زمینی] 🟡•- عراق : عراق با استقرار نیروهای خود در ویرانه‌های کویت سیتی و استفاده از ساختمان‌های نیمه‌تخریب‌شده، زیرزمین‌ها، استحکامات باقی مانده به عنوان پناهگاه و سنگر، یک شبکه دفاعی شهری غیرقابل نفوذ ایجاد کرده است. آرایش دفاعی عراق بر پایه سه جبهه مجزا با پشتیبانی متقابل و ارتباط از طریق استحکامات و بیسیم‌های رمزی استوار است که هرگونه نفوذ دشمن را با تله‌های مرگبار، کمین‌های متحرک و آتش

27 Jul 2026, 06:35 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026

اعتلاف با وجود تلفات سنگین و عقب‌نشینی تاکتیکی ناوگان هوایی، توانسته است با حفظ بخشی از جنگنده‌های خود و استفاده از پدافندهای زمینی لایه‌ای، همچنان تهدیدی هوایی محدود برای نیروهای ائتلاف ایجاد کند و با اجرای تاکتیک‌های آمدوشد و کمین‌های هوایی، فشار روانی بر خلبانان عراق را حفظ نماید. با این حال، در کوتاه‌مدت، آسمان میدان نبرد به طور کامل در اختیار عراق است و این برتری هوایی با تعداد زیاد ، تأثیر مستقیمی بر روند نبرد

27 Jul 2026, 06:34 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

╭─┅۰═ঊঈ◇ꕥ◇ঊঈ═۰┅─╮ ♅ Battle of Kuwait City ♅ ╰─┅۰═ঊঈ◇ꕥ◇ঊঈ═۰┅─╯ ✈️•°[بخش هوایی] ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⚫️•- عراق: ➖•Air Operation 9.5 ➖•Ranged Warfare 9.0 ➖•Dogfight 8.0 ➖•Electronic Warfare 9.6 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ⚫️•- ائتلاف : ➖•Air Operation 9.5 ➖•Ranged Warfare 8.5 ➖•Dogfight 8.5 ➖•Electronic Warfare 9.5 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ •°🛃نمره هوایی: •-عراق: 9.0 •-اعتلاف : 9.0 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🟡نبرد هوایی بر فراز کویت سیتی

👍1

24 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC50 viewsread 11 August 2026

خطوط دفاعی با پشتیبانی متقابل سنگرها که هر نقطه از زمین مقابل زیر آتش حداقل چندین سنگر قرار دارد، و استفاده از تاکتیک‌های ضدزره شامل موشک‌های کوتاه‌برد و توپ‌های بدون لگد، هرگونه نفوذ زرهی دشمن را در نقاط تنگ با تله‌های مرگبار، آتش متقابل و انفجارهای کنترل‌شده مواجه می‌سازند. پدافندهای کوتاه‌برد و موشکی عراق نیز با وجود اختلالات شدید جنگ الکترونیک مهاجم، به دلیل استفاده از سیستم‌های الکترواپتیکی و هدایت تلویزیونی که

24 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026

•°[بخش زمینی] ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🟡•- (اعتلاف): نیروی اعتلاف با ترکیبی از بمباران هوایی نسبی به خاطر تلفات توسط بمب‌افکن‌های استراتژیک و جنگنده‌های چند منظوره ، و آتش‌بار توپخانه‌ای متمرکز و هماهنگ، خطوط دفاعی اولیه عراق را در مرزهای ناصریه کمی ملایم تر کرده و با اجرای تاکتیک‌های پیشروی محتاطانه و مرحله‌ای، از گرفتار شدن در تله‌های فرسایشی و کمین‌های کوهستانی (حیف بیابونه) جلوگیری می‌کند. مهاجم با استفاده از شناسایی ه

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Castlevania_War. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,264,871 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘊𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘭𝘦𝘷𝘢𝘯𝘪𝘢 𝘞𝘢𝘳” (@Castlevania_War), 48 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Castlevania_War.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.