Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CrystalCastle

Channel

CrystalCastle

@Castle_Workshop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004432820808
TypeChannel
Username@Castle_Workshop
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 12 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Castle_Workshop

Growth

111211.59 August 2026 — 11 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:1912+1
12 Aug 2026, 08:1611no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:1511first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
233.3%
avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.0
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held12 (12 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total196
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1737.8%
🥰1533.3%
custom 5343855754870806991715.6%
custom 535059200734765142848.89%
😁24.44%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кто-то из читателей снял лайк с работы после выхода главы, ору Вот, кстати, именно поэтому сокрушаюсь из-за отсутствия отзывов на новых главах, тк мне интересна обратная связь, даже если не зашло куда в итоге повернула история или ещё какие-нибудь детали ☺️ Уж лучше написать «блин, хотелось для них хэппи энда, поэтому дизлайк», а я отвечу «увы нет», чем, имхо, так уходит по-английски

2

9 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC8 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Сама написала новую главу Кутв, сама поплакала 😭 До финала осталась 1-2 главы, а это значит ещё больше слёз

4

7 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC11 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я уехала к маме, всю неделю сплю и играю в бг3 💄 Такого благостного вайба и крепкого сна у меня уже давно не было Но (!) новая глава Очага пишется, залью сегодня или завтра. После неё в субботу или воскресенье будет выход Кутв, ибо нужно возвращаться к расписанию, а не только зачищать подземелья ☺️

custom 53505920073476514284custom 53438557548708069911

24 Jul 2026, 22:09 UTC38 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня чувствую себя умничкой и деловусей: прибралась дома, подала доки на визу, заплатила налоги и залила новую главу Кутв 🌺 Сама глава писалась тяжело и долго, было много мыслей о том, как повернуть сюжет, и итоговый результат меня устраивает более чем полностью. Героев ждёт таймским (люблю его использовать в работах, хотя некоторые и считают моветоном), но думаю сделать его не настолько длительным как в Очаге, г

🥰6

21 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Выход новой главы Кутв жоско задерживается по двум причинам: 1. Глава для меня морально тяжёлая и тяп-ляп её не хочу писать. Нужно многое обдумать и сообразить как это оформить 2. У меня случилась внезапная рабоче-культурная раскайфовка в Питере ☺️

4🥰1

19 Jul 2026, 21:49 UTC56 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мастерпис от чудесной Dudster mezter в честь единения наших любимых душой и телом 😏 Как ни странно, работа над четырнадцатой частью прошла легко, возможно за это в ответе большое количество диалогов, которые я наконец-то научилась писать. А возможно то, что я её не прокручивала в голове и на бумаге тысячу раз, а просто написала то, что придумалось. Как говорится, ху ноус ☺️ В любом случае, текстом я довольна и счаст

🥰5

15 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Вот такие файлики для художников делаю при заказе артов 🥺 Нравится оформлять их в скрапбучной манере, а искать референсы для внешности персонажей отдельный вид удовольствия (и пытки) p.s По Кутв пока собраны только сиблинги ван дер Бисты, но планирую добавить ещё родителей и Аластора с Лоренцо

4

13 Jul 2026, 23:55 UTC57 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пересказала подружке свежую главу Кутв ☺️

😁21

13 Jul 2026, 23:47 UTC53 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‼️🚨 Спойреры к Очагу Порода матери, характер батери 👀 Зарисовка про будущую дочку Лоры и Сандора: Сандор был в главном зале - месте, которое медленно утрачивало свой мрачный, зловещий дух под мягким влиянием Лоры. Солнечный свет лился сквозь высокие окна, ловя пылинки, танцующие в воздухе. Он стоял перед тяжелым дубовым столом, и поверхность его теперь была покрыта картой их земель, начерченной на пергаменте. Тро

13 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC39 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Задумалась о написании новой работы, но не раньше, чем закончу Кутв, ибо 2 драмы писать одновременно выше моих моральных и физических сил 😳 Построила костяк фанфика, а там сам деталями обрастёт. Для вдохновения хотела заглянуть в отпуске в Сёто, но пока, возможно, ограничусь фотками из Киото, они тоже весьма себе джапаниз олд мани.

🥰3

12 Jul 2026, 06:09 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пока писала тринадцатую часть Очага, чуть не свихнулась в попытке понять кто куда бежит и где что стоит 😱 Поэтому накидала схему Хартвуд-Холла и плюсом нашла идеальную картинку главного дома

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Castle_Workshop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,315,209 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CrystalCastle” (@Castle_Workshop), 12 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Castle_Workshop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.