赞同 https://x.com/colemurray/status/2085442810875089107
Signed Cason Kervis
Channel
@CasonKervis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
190subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002725616333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CasonKervis |
| Description | 会发些碎碎念,随缘关注 DM:@cscnk52 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CasonKervis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 190 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 190 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,400 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 57.1% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 42.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
赞同 https://x.com/colemurray/status/2085442810875089107
Signed Cason Kervis
https://planetscale.com/blog/concurrency-vs-throughput-vitess-mysql
Signed Cason Kervis
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/python_typing
❤1
Signed Cason Kervis
Jarred 笑死我了 This should be like a 3 day project at most https://x.com/jarredsumner/status/2085651449997111571
Signed Cason Kervis
在 Zed DeltaDB 的 HN评论里看到了 "engineering privilege" 这个词:一些公司的工程师能长期做与核心产品无关的事,不断重造轮子,写新编译器、包管理器、框架……还不需要明显的营收承诺。这听起来让人羡慕,似乎也不太符合商业逻辑,但我们用的很多好东西正是这么来的。 曾经硅谷给人的印象就是这样一个地方:大公司给了程序员这群单纯的人无需为生活担忧的薪水、宽松的管理和自由探索的氛围,正是这些条件,催生了过去二十年无数举足轻重、影响深远的开源项目。更早的时候,在电子科技发展的初期,贝尔实验室那样的地方也是如此,为业界输出了无数改变世界的技术和人才。所以我一直觉得,Google 就是计算机和互联网领域的贝尔实验室。 学术界其实也一样,同样存在 "academia privilege"。学术界本就应该提供宽松的环境,鼓励人们出于对科学的热爱和自身的兴趣,在自己喜欢的方向上探索,而不是出于功利主义,为钱或为名…
❤1
Signed Cason Kervis
刚想看看bun怎么还没发1.4,点进 issue 列表就是小小中文震撼... (求你们别给中文技术圈抹黑了😭😭😭 https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/37084
🤣3
Signed Cason Kervis
和朋友聊哭了 身心健康最重要 多和同频的人打交道
❤1
Signed Cason Kervis
https://blog.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-os/
Signed Cason Kervis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq76pQsI1iw
Signed Cason Kervis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iztSu3rKmH8
Signed Cason Kervis
https://github.com/slorber/trailing-slash-guide
Signed Cason Kervis
慢一点 https://mariozechner.at/posts/2026-03-25-thoughts-on-slowing-the-fuck-down/
Signed Cason Kervis
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CasonKervis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 590,467 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cason's life” (@CasonKervis), 190 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CasonKervis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.