Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CashMachtFesch

Channel

CashMachtFesch

@CashmachtFesch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

838subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001487911717
TypeChannel
Username@CashmachtFesch
Created9 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CashmachtFesch

Growth

838841839.56 August 2026 — 841 subscribers6 August 2026 — 841 subscribers12 August 2026 — 840 subscribers20 August 2026 — 838 subscribers6 August 202620 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 838–841 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 03:25838-2
12 Aug 2026, 22:49840-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:04841no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:00841first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 838 subscribers
Avg views / post
107
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held19 (22 September 202529 July 2026)
Views total107
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4031.7%
3830.2%
🔥1915.1%
💯1511.9%
🥴75.56%
🤔32.38%
🤗21.59%
👌10.794%
🕊10.794%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC107 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @danijelsheranPhoto

Eine Akzeptanz-Pflicht soll unser Bargeld schützen. Folge: Schilder wie „Hier nur Kartenzahlung“ sollen bald verboten werden. BILD erklärt die EU-Wende. Ohne großes Aufheben hat eine EU-weite Bargeld-Annahmepflicht für Händler die entscheidende Hürde genommen: Das Europäische Parlament stimmte ihr im Rahmen eines größeren Gesetzespakets zu, in dem es auch um die Einführung des „digitalen Euro“ ab Januar 2029 geht. E

5🤔2🤗1

1 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC252 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @klartext_rheinmainPhoto

Abermillionen von Euro europaweit verschwendet für Stimmungsmache zugunsten des digitalen (T)Euros! Hat alles nichts genutzt. Keiner will ihn. Keiner braucht ihn. Weg damit! Stimmen Sie mit dem Geldbeutel ab. BEZAHLEN SIE AUSSCHLIESSLICH BAR! quelle t.me/klartext_rheinmain www.klartext-rheinmain.de/kontakt

👍122🤔1

29 Jun 2026, 21:09 UTC≈1,660 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Bargeld ist die letzte Freiheit die wir "noch" haben, drum ist es so wichtig daran festzuhalten! Peter Hahne bringt es auf den Punkt und es ist herrlich, wenn man in einem Geschäft oder Restaurant laut erklärt, warum Bargeld so wichtig ist und was sie vor haben. Die Menschen drum rum hören immer zu. Meine Erfahrung. Einfach mal ausprobieren und genießen. #CashmachtFesch #NeinZurKontrollwährung #NeinZumDigitalenEur

3👌1

7 May 2026, 14:10 UTC937 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🥴6🔥3🕊1

14 Apr 2026, 05:00 UTC916 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://Bargelderhalt.eu Geschäfte beginnen Bargeld abzuschaffen. Uns droht der perfekte Überwachungsstaat. Jetzt gibt es eine einmalige Möglichkeit, Bargeld gesetzlich zu schützen. Geben Sie Ihre Stimme für den Erhalt des einzigen freien Zahlungsmittels!

9🤗1

16 Feb 2026, 18:03 UTC575 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitteltvPhoto

EU-Parlament stellt sich hinter den digitalen Euro Das Europaparlament hat am 13. Februar 2026 mit großer Mehrheit (378 Ja-Stimmen, 220 Nein, 37 Enthaltungen) eine Entschließung verabschiedet, die den Weg für den digitalen Euro freimacht. Die Abgeordneten fordern die EU-Kommission und die EZB auf, die Vorbereitungen für eine digitale Zentralbankwährung (CBDC) zügig voranzutreiben. Der digitale Euro soll „ergänzend“

🔥6

15 Feb 2026, 15:08 UTC716 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#Bargeldabschaffung #Bargeld #Stützle Deutsche Bank kündigt Organisator der EU-Bargeldpetition das Konto 05.02.2026 https://x.com/norberthaering/status/2019299442612908260 https://norberthaering.de/bargeld-widerstand/bargeldbrief/

🔥8

10 Dec 2025, 12:19 UTC≈1,130 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Der digitale Euro soll uns retten. Sagt die EZB. Ich weiß nicht, wer sich diese Märchen noch reinzieht, aber die PR ist so durchschaubar, dass man fast lachen müsste, wenn’s nicht so bitter wäre. „Wir brauchen den digitalen Euro, weil die Menschen immer weniger Bargeld nutzen.“ Natürlich tut es das, wenn man die Menschen erst durch Automatenabbau, Abhebelimits und Gebühren dazu drängt. Das ist wie jemanden verhunge

💯72

8 Dec 2025, 15:25 UTC≈2,260 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

🔥 Aufruf an alle Bargeldrebellen – Jetzt wird zurückgeschlagen! 🔥 Liebe Bargeldrebellen, freie Menschen – genug ist genug. Die Mächtigen da oben glauben, sie könnten uns wie willenlose Konsumenten durch die digitale Manege treiben. Sie meinen, wir würden es schweigend hinnehmen, dass man uns mit „App-Rabatt“ ködert, während man im Hintergrund den letzten Rest unserer Freiheit zerschneidet. Sie meinen, wir seien zu m

3

6 Oct 2025, 20:31 UTC574 viewsread 6 August 2026

Mehr muss man dazu nicht sagen. Nichts anderes habe ich erwartet. Ein wertvoller und toller Mann, so wie viele die uns verlassen haben. Wieso? Weil sie Reichweite und Mut hatten. Dieser Post von ihm hat mich damals zu der Kampagne #CashMachtFesch inspiriert. Auf Facebook von ihm damals gepostet: https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02jxGFn6LNhtXxEFAD792PbS9RAYG5Hr5kLKr8dQ2WxhzsnmdnvHaXk2ri82kYXW6Kl&id=

6 Oct 2025, 20:30 UTC464 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschPhoto

„Es kam zu einem raschen Höhenverlust, als eine Sturzspirale einsetzte, und Baumgartner war nicht in der Lage, den Schirm aus der Spirale heraus zusteuern“, erklärte der Staatsanwalt bei Bild. Der 56-Jährige sei über Porto Sant‘Elpidio in eine gefährliche Abwärtsspirale geraten – und habe dann den entscheidenden Fehler gemacht. Eine „konstante und entschlossene Betätigung der rechten Steuerleine“ sei notwendig gewes

1

2 Oct 2025, 10:10 UTC863 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ich habe mit Unterstützung der KI den offiziellen EU-Gesetzesvorschlag zum digitalen Euro gelesen. Und hier wird es spannend: Was drinsteht, klingt oft beruhigend – aber entscheidend ist, was schwammig bleibt. 🔹 „Der digitale Euro ist kein programmierbares Geld.“ ➡️ Klingt nach Sicherheit. Aber gleichzeitig erlaubt der Text „bedingte Zahlungen“. Das heißt: Automatisierte Zahlungen, die an Regeln geknüpft sind, sind

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CashmachtFesch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 791,436 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CashMachtFesch” (@CashmachtFesch), 838 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CashmachtFesch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.