Channel
@Bargeldrebellen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,356subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003437640479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bargeldrebellen |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bargeldrebellen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 4,356 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 4,375 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 4,376 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 4,383 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 4,384 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,212 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 685 | 56.5% | |
| ❤ | 295 | 24.3% | |
| 👏 | 93 | 7.67% | |
| 💯 | 61 | 5.03% | |
| 🙏 | 28 | 2.31% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 1.49% | |
| 🏆 | 12 | 0.99% | |
| 🍾 | 7 | 0.578% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 0.578% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.413% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.083% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Meine Stieftochter ist gerade in Zentral Amerika! Cash is King! Bargeld ist bevorzgstes Zahlungsmittel! Banken bekommen NICHTS! Und das Geschaeft behaelt 100% der Waehrung
👍167❤27👏26🔥4
🇸🇪 Ausgerechnet Schweden stärkt wieder das Bargeld. Dabei galt das Land jahrelang als Musterbeispiel für die bargeldlose Gesellschaft. Warum also der Kurswechsel? Weil selbst die schwedische Regierung erkannt hat, dass ein rein digitales Zahlungssystem im Ernstfall zum Risiko werden kann. Ein Stromausfall. Ein Cyberangriff. Eine gestörte Infrastruktur. Dann hilft weder die Banking-App noch die Kreditkarte. Bargeld …
👍109❤25👏9🙏4
Liebe Freunde, wir bekommen natürlich mit, dass diverse Kanäle unsere Arbeit teilen, diese Aktion unterstützen. Gerne würden wir euch auf einem Unterstützerpost verlinken. Natürlich nur, wenn ihr das möchtet. Schickt uns einfach eine kleine Nachricht an [email protected] mit dem Link zu eurem Telegramkanal. Zusammenhalt ist enorm wichtig. Deshalb wollen wir uns für eure Unterstützung bedanken! Eure Bargeldr…
❤35👍25💯8
Gesagt, getan. Unsere eigene Petitionsseite ist ab sofort online. Damit habt Ihr nun die Möglichkeit, die Petition direkt auf unserer eigenen Plattform zu unterzeichnen sowie weiterzuverbreiten. Da viele große Plattformen Inhalte inzwischen stark einschränken oder aufweichen möchten, haben wir uns entschieden, diesen Schritt selbst zu gehen; unabhängig, direkt sowie ohne unnötige Einschränkungen. Die Petition kann…
👍40❤23💯6👏5🔥1😱1
Liebe Freunde, bereits in den ersten Stunden hat OpenPetition auf unsere Petition reagiert und verlangt, dass wir Teile der Beschreibung verändern beziehungsweise auf offiziellen Plattformen deutlich abschwächen. Das werden wir selbstverständlich nicht tun. Wir bleiben unserer Sache im Gesamten treu. Unsere Inhalte sind ordentlich aufgebaut, sauber formuliert und klar verständlich. Deshalb gilt auch hier: Schuster, …
👍96👏35❤26🔥2
🚨 EUROPA STEUERT IN DIE DIGITALE KONTROLLFALLE — JETZT REICHT ES! 🚨 Ganz Europa schläft derweilen Stück für Stück in eine Zukunft hinein, in welcher Bargeld verschwindet, digitale Kontrolle wächst sowie jeder Mensch immer gläserner werden soll. Digitaler Euro. Digitale ID. Bargeld-Obergrenzen. Totale Nachverfolgbarkeit. Man verkauft es uns als „Fortschritt“ — doch in Wahrheit geht es um Kontrolle, Abhängigkeit sow…
💯47❤21🙏7🏆4👍3🤔3🔥1
Petition folgt in Kürze! Eure Bargeldrebellen
👍49
Welches Thema sollen wir als Petition ausarbeiten?
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍75❤7🔥6🙏4
Liebe Freunde, wir sind uns im Klaren darüber, daß Petitionen an sich nichts bewirken – zumindest nicht, wenn es um wirklich gewichtige Themen geht. Doch sie stärken das Gemeinschaftsgefühl und erzeugen einen gewissen Masseneffekt, durch den noch mehr Menschen auf uns aufmerksam werden. Aus diesem Grunde werden wir in Kürze eine solche Petition ins Leben rufen. Ladet also gern weiterhin Freunde und Bekannte zu den B…
👍69❤18🤝7🙏4🤔2
Unser erstes Schreiben „Formelle Beschwerde wegen möglicher Verstöße gegen EU-Verbraucherrecht“ hat über 180.000 Aufrufe erzielt. Wie so oft beobachten wir auch hier das Phänomen, daß etwas Neues zunächst eine gewisse Dynamik entfacht, dann jedoch wieder einschläft, wenn es nicht fortlaufend – beinahe wie eine Unterhaltungsshow – begleitet wird. Doch Eure Kraft sowie Eure Zeit sind wertvoll, weshalb wir bewußt auf di…
❤40👏15🙏9👍5
Dokument Nr. 5 ist da Widerspruch gegen den digitalen Euro Der nächste Schritt im gemeinsamen Widerstand. Nicht laut, nicht blind – sondern klar, bewusst und entschlossen. Dieses Schreiben ist mehr als nur ein Brief. Es ist ein Zeichen. Ein Zeichen dafür, dass wir noch denken, noch fühlen, noch selbst entscheiden wollen. Der digitale Euro ist nicht einfach nur eine neue Form von Geld – er ist eine Richtungsentscheid…
❤32👍25🍾7🔥2
Werte Freunde da draußen, damit ihr nicht lange suchen müßt, haben wir noch einmal alle Schreiben in diesen Beitrag gepackt. Verschickt am besten alle, damit jene Herrschaften irgendwann auch einmal arbeiten sowie etwas Sinnvolles tun. Vor allem fragt nach Ablauf von zwei bis vier Wochen nach, wo die Antwort bleibt. Ihr bürokratisches System verwaltet die Menschen, wickelt deren Selbstbestimmung ab, als sei es Hande…
❤41👍22🏆8👏3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Bargeldrebellen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Welches Thema sollen wir als Petition ausarbeiten?
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,311,131 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Die Bargeldrebellen” (@Bargeldrebellen), 4,356 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bargeldrebellen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.