Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

$ CAR

@CarranzaCAR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

921subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001680980203
TypeChannel
Username@CarranzaCAR
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CarranzaCAR

Growth

921924922.57 August 2026 — 924 subscribers7 August 2026 — 924 subscribers13 August 2026 — 921 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 921–924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:53921-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:17924no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:50924first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣4425.1%
3017.1%
🌭2715.4%
😁158.57%
👍95.14%
🥱84.57%
🤔74.00%
🖕63.43%
🍌52.86%
42.29%
🌚31.71%
👻31.71%
🔥31.71%
🤨31.71%
🍾21.14%
👏21.14%
👨‍💻21.14%
🥴21.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2023 to 26 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Nov 2024, 20:53 UTC≈1,760 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

it's been 1 year since my last post in this channel

🌭1912🤣54👍4🌚2🍌2🍾2

Signed Carranza

26 Oct 2023, 20:19 UTC≈6,710 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/+kq1M-FMIJVc2M2Q0 10 can join, for OGs that were here ❤️

13🌭2👍2

Signed Carranza

24 Aug 2023, 17:45 UTC≈6,340 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StonkyGems

Shibarium is now live. I've shilled $DOG at 50K$, and $RYOSHI at 30K Both have passed through 1M$ — I'm seeing them in the millions once Shibarium is adopted @ArcaneGems and as chat, use @shibariumlobby

Signed Carranza

18 Jul 2023, 20:31 UTC≈7,180 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

dang, @arcanegems just called a token at 4k mcap and sent it to 3M$ just with his volume

🤣6🌭4🤔4👨‍💻21

Signed Carranza

13 Jul 2023, 23:01 UTC≈5,610 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

classic carranza W https://t.me/ArcaneGems

🥱5🤣3🌭2🔥2

Signed Carranza

13 Jul 2023, 00:58 UTC≈4,330 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/StonkyGems new caller, follow him, kinda god

🥱3🌚1

Signed Carranza

13 Jul 2023, 00:40 UTC≈2,820 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Leclerc es un tiburon

👻1🤣1

Signed Carranza

13 Jul 2023, 00:40 UTC≈2,260 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @LeclercCallsVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

😁4

Signed Carranza

12 Jul 2023, 22:14 UTC≈2,430 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

removed safeanalyzer, only /i now — let's bring it back and make something healthy t.me/+rFCFdJdCniBmOWVk

🖕63🤔3🤨3🍌2

Signed Carranza

10 Jul 2023, 20:01 UTC≈1,780 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Caesars_CallsPhoto

Something sweet coming!! More to follow

🤣20🥴2

Signed Carranza

9 Jul 2023, 19:53 UTC≈1,890 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

funny thing he claims the Xs while token lasted ~10 minutes, had 99% buy tax for the 2 blocks and then 20/30 tax for the next 10 minutes til it died

🤣1

Signed Carranza

9 Jul 2023, 19:50 UTC≈1,800 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Leclerc really doesn't give a fuck about sending his people straight to taxfarms where devs eat 75-90% of mw This one was like 4 days, "super bullish...", used 0% of marketing wallet and ran with everything to MEXC changing lives everyday, but for the worst

👍3😁1

Signed Carranza

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CarranzaCAR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jul 2023, 01:27 UTCAnonymous Poll208 voters

Summer crypto?

  1. Yes61%
  2. No, party & holidays39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2023 to 26 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“$ CAR” (@CarranzaCAR), 921 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CarranzaCAR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.