Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🦌•ʚ°𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐥𝐞◝´-🕯️

@Carlwhitecandle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

946subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001955851015
TypeChannel
Username@Carlwhitecandle
Description-`𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐥 !˖ ࣪⭑ - 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐩 - 𝟐𝟏 . 💿 - 𝐈'𝐦 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐫𝐧 𐙚𝐖𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐚 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐤? -` @CarlsDoves_bot 𔓕 - @Carlstimelapse
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Carlwhitecandle

Growth

9468 Aug 2026, 16:17 — 946 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 16:30 — 946 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 16:178 Aug 2026, 16:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 945–947 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 16:30946no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:17946first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.5%
avg views ÷ 946 subscribers
Avg views / post
326
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (17 August 20258 August 2026)
Views total1,631
Reactions total110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
221
Videos
9
Links
55

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,073 reactions across 17 posts, in 71 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 590692030231452545625712.4%
custom 530800683108220043125412.3%
custom 53548991465809726701929.26%
custom 52087397215759415501808.68%
🍓1798.63%
custom 53640373552231405291768.49%
custom 58029168489031357691627.81%
custom 5830073093892083981552.65%
custom 5341569286081109906532.56%
💋462.22%
custom 5933701493579323199351.69%
🕊321.54%
custom 5870773720112439421291.40%
custom 5285427341898563139271.30%
custom 5933923015107549989251.21%
custom 5397926867686677288231.11%
custom 5465125028351736654200.965%
custom 5303338055602596649170.82%
custom 5445156784794794345170.82%
custom 5208753783298871048140.675%
51 further kinds28013.5%

Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,073reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 19 we hold a reading for · 37%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Carlwhitecandle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 August 2025 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC128 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

میوچکرم💕💕

custom 586199634026273822412custom 58616584938402673063custom 58618518232031634323

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

7 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC865 views81 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

-𝐅𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐀𝐫𝐭 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞 ໑ ᨳ ꒰ 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬 ꒱ ഒ

custom 583007309389208398155custom 59336017730286441059custom 59338440779036150845custom 58300418351201035924custom 58300307326296438243🍓2🕊2💋1

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

5 Aug 2026, 04:24 UTC312 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

خیلی قشنگ شدشششش شخ۸شحشحححح عاشقشم واقعا خیلی به کارل اومده😭😭😭💕💕💕💕💕 شاهکاره شاهکار.

🕊3

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

5 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC272 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MinutesXarsedPhoto

آرت ترید با کارل سان لباس اجرای سوپرانو

🍓8

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

7 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC≈3,880 views221 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

⌗᥀🦢° 𑄈𑄈 ᡴꪫ ,, 𓂃 ☁️♡ ⁺ഒ

custom 5208739721575941550180custom 520875378329887104814custom 529432897944710397412custom 52559364987164006374custom 54112154879105763024🕊3🍓2💋2

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

3 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,560 views128 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓87custom 539538685838755161213custom 53123087948799266339custom 59335404194208208226custom 53868549831634730735🕊4custom 52854653652440455874

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

27 Feb 2026, 19:49 UTC≈4,480 views189 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

⌗᥀▫️𝐇𝐚𝐫𝐮𝐦𝐢 °𑄈 ᡴꪫ ,, 𓂃 ♡▫️ ▫️⁺ഒ

custom 5802916848903135769162custom 580332969404453259410custom 58031157058889387737custom 58029395091505905404custom 58032249312022430833custom 58033583414763922393

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

25 Feb 2026, 09:31 UTC≈2,560 views121 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⁺ᥫ᭡ WIP▫️𓂃 ᥀໑ ᨳ ꒰ ▫️▫️ ꒱ ഒ

🍓76custom 587077372011243942125🕊5custom 58727396082481962745custom 58706675914705551104custom 58709821720551817523custom 58705702503317577132custom 58709129801320448081

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

31 Dec 2025, 20:36 UTC≈2,990 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💋43🕊6🍓4custom 58707737201124394214💘3

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

13 Dec 2025, 19:07 UTC≈3,750 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52110532400696690839custom 52085599041801634225

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

9 Dec 2025, 12:20 UTC≈4,100 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𐙚𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗹

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Carlwhitecandle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 359,999 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🦌•ʚ°𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐥𝐞◝´-🕯️” (@Carlwhitecandle), 946 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Carlwhitecandle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.