Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Carbon Crypto Services

@CarbonCryptoLounge

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

36subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001791194017
TypeChannel
Username@CarbonCryptoLounge
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CarbonCryptoLounge

Growth

353635.57 August 2026 — 35 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:5836+1
10 Aug 2026, 23:0235no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:4535first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3772.5%
👍917.6%
47.84%
😁11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2022 to 23 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Mar 2024, 12:06 UTC79 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @IllestShotCallsPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

2 Nov 2022, 04:45 UTC568 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

QUICK UPDATE $TWIT is holding strong right around ath. With poocoin ads going live tomorrow I'm extremely bullish! Hopefully everyone of you guys got in. This team isn't messing around! Carbon crypto lounge strikes again 🔥😎 @TwitterBurnOfficialPortal 🔥Enjoy the gains! We are never ending🔥

1 Nov 2022, 23:02 UTC244 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

For those of you in the private lounge! We out here making those x's again! GOOD LAUNCH ENTRY OFF TO THE MOON! 🔥JUST LAUNCHED🔥 @TwitterBurnOfficialPortal

20 Oct 2022, 06:14 UTC≈1,030 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Carbon Crypto is pleased to announce an AMA with @phoenixrevive on Thursday 7:30pm UTC. This is an exciting project on the BSC with three unique features which safeguards holders and adds incredible value to investors. Be sure to tune in to find out more! Current MC: 81k 🚀 AMA location: https://t.me/+smonWdu2FaRjMzVh

🔥4

20 Oct 2022, 06:10 UTC301 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Called by BLONDE (yellow dot) and seems to be doing well. DYOR NFA. @newbitcoinproject

👍1

20 Oct 2022, 05:32 UTC310 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

45x @Phoenixrevive was called at $1800 MC in our lounge and is currently sitting at $81,000 MC. This project includes one of our co-owners @biggiesmalls5001 on the core team and based dev Shirou. We will be hosting Phoenix revive in the near future for an AMA and look forward to hearing what their three unique aspects of their project can bring to investors. Stay tuned for further updates. Keep printing Carbonites! 💰

🔥4

6 Oct 2022, 22:27 UTC291 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://twitter.com/binance/status/1578148574205878272?s=46&t=c2JDBfM6bJvUSii9YSnRbA Waiting further updates. Believe to be an exploit at this time. It’s said a big hack has just occurred. Will update when we know more

👍1

24 Sept 2022, 10:40 UTC350 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

MetaVault Trade has been on a nice organic pump since we were first introduced to it, the community has grown over four times it’s original size. We hosted an AMA with Steve from the Metavault team and since that point our community could have benefitted from nearly a 4x (that’s without the staking benefits) https://dexscreener.com/polygon/0x30f5c777ab316e6878d2b71a32274e4c2842327a This is a polygon project paired

2

22 Sept 2022, 23:15 UTC283 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Pre-launch call inside our private lounge, those that got in made some good x's today given the launch was smooth and plenty of chance to get in😎🤙

16 Sept 2022, 18:24 UTC321 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Welcome to Fire Floki! 🔥 Fire Floki is a new token launching on the Binance Smart Chain, with the backing of the Carbon Crypto Team. With this backing, be prepared to see some serious movements. We don’t bend to Moonboys, we have a chart strategy to maximise all our bags to keep the flame alive and the fire burning! 🔥 All liquidity is accounted for and providers start 20% down on launch price. Max contribution was

12 Sept 2022, 20:00 UTC287 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Veriscan called by Biggie at 100k MC in our private lounge ( https://t.me/+smonWdu2FaRjMzVh ) is now at 280k MC. This project has a lot of potential with a based team trying to develop an auditing company. With a health LP, strong volume and many big callers already on board. This can travel far with CMC and CG within reach in the short term. DYOR NFA Chart Telegram

😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CarbonCryptoLounge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 620,250 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Carbon Crypto Services” (@CarbonCryptoLounge), 36 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CarbonCryptoLounge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.