Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Captain Reviews ☸️

@CaptainReviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001830695946
TypeChannel
Username@CaptainReviews
DescriptionOwner - For Promos - Twitter - Disclaimer: https://t.me/CaptainReviews/5
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 27 October 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/CaptainReviews

Growth

267 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:0526no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:3726first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3836.5%
2120.2%
🔥2120.2%
🐳1110.6%
🎉87.69%
💯54.81%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2022 to 10 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jan 2023, 22:46 UTC349 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

New AI project, new trend, new moonshot? 🤔

💯4

1 Jan 2023, 00:26 UTC405 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Happy new years all! Let's all print in 2023 and make it our year! 🎉

8🎉2

19 Dec 2022, 23:04 UTC546 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

This ETH play was insane. I said 100x and it went from 33k marketcap to 2.3m. That's around 70x. You also had a chance to get in at $600k and $1m which it made a floor for quite some time. Big play, team is based. 💯

7

17 Dec 2022, 13:55 UTC442 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Launched at 33k, went to 1.5m as far as I know. so around 40x if you caught it. It was a great launch, wait for a dip I think dev can do more with this. 🔥

🔥4

15 Dec 2022, 09:18 UTC401 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Okay, here is a stealth launch. I think this can do over 100x. They will do stealth launch, I do not know when. ETH play. Let's seee! Join Telegram to see more: https://t.me/NewInuLaunch Risk: high TAX: Unknown Starting MCAP: $100k

👍8

14 Dec 2022, 05:09 UTC338 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Almost touched 2x. It is safe to say 2x as the tax is zero. SO MANY SCALPERS so the price barely moves. We should touch millions on matchup. https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x908ef6b57a6bb5b043ea6ef84142895b519c713c 💯

🎉6🐳3💯1

13 Dec 2022, 18:51 UTC442 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

On my phone right now, despite the whitelist sell off this should do well. 0 tax, cmc & cg on the way. Hotbit and bitmart confirmed. To get a confirmed listing you have to pay full as far as I know. This should do well. TAX: %0 MCAP: $178k Risk: Very low as it is 0 tax, I think most of the dips gets eaten before the listings.

🐳6

16 Nov 2022, 02:59 UTC306 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

What's the plays y'all, let's try to find some GEMS! 💎

🐳1

10 Nov 2022, 13:42 UTC387 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Wow. CPI came in hot 🥵 It is %7.7, expected was %7.9, PREV %8.2

🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CaptainReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Captain Reviews ☸️” (@CaptainReviews), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CaptainReviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.