Channel
@CallerInuAnnChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001455333537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CallerInuAnnChannel |
| Description | 🔊 Official announcement channel of https://t.me/CallerInu |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CallerInuAnnChannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 12 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 12 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
78 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 36 | 46.2% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 25.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 8.97% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 6.41% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 5.13% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2022 to 26 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Quick reminder: We have not spent months of our lives just to say "f*ck it" and leave everything. Whoever participated bought into our project and became part of something 100% more than all the false promises you can get out there. Work takes time, releasing good things takes time, and doing things the proper way takes time. However, satisfying every need will be so time-consuming that there will be nothing left to…
Hey, community! We have a meeting with the developers this Sunday, and things are looking bright! Supposedly, we will be ready to go live with it and, as beforementioned, to accompany items properly! Without being misunderstood, do not feel neglected, ignored, abandoned, or betrayed! We won't waste months of our lives, nor will we turn backs on your investments! However, going the same thing every day over and over …
🥴4👍3
Hey, community! Making this announcement to clear some dust off the screens of everyone! We are here, tho, silent because we are working on the dApp. Nothing has changed to put it out in the wild as some announcement. Tests and widget improvements are going thru day by day. As soon as we are more confident with the release date, we will share it; though it happened once that we thought we could push things hard to r…
👍3
First and foremost, we hope you are doing great and taking some time off any chart, analytics, or news because that time of the year is supposed to be family/friends only and some grass-touching activities (or enjoying a snowy day.) Second, but not less important: We are currently maneuvering between work and family gatherings. However, what we have accomplished so far is still in our developers' work modules. Trust…
👏5👍1
Greetings, Caller fam! We wanted to share with you an idea that was born today! An idea that will echo throughout each block of each blockchain! An idea as simple as — SPACEZ ✅ We, from Caller Inu, will create the so-called-movement — SPACEZ. What will it look like? SPACEZ ✅ ✅ Twitter spaces hosted in our Twitter account — https://twitter.com/CallerInu ✅ Different types of AMA — each SPACEZ will be between our p…
👍3💩1🤔1
I just wanted to address something that one of our top holders and community members asked. To start off with the blacklist. We have anti-snipe protection, which is a blacklist. As simple as that; however, everything is being monitored and taken care of by our contract SAFU developer — Trynos. You are in safe hands. Second, are taxes. We can only go up to certain levels, which are 10% roundtrip. Third the ownershi…
❤3🔥3🤔1
On a side note. 👀
❤3🔥2
By the way, we have ensured ourselves that at least one AMA with a promotional post will come along with the release of our dApp. That's something from not so long ago. Tho, at this point, I can't go further with leaking information. 🤝 I believe in the course of the next few days, we will be able to arrange some more things to come with the update of ENIGMA!
🔥5👍1
🕊 Check out our new tweet! Like, share & RT! 🔥 Link: https://twitter.com/CallerInu/status/1605144207345258497?s=20&t=t_b2yxmY2DzglSNbQ50N5g
👍2
What is ENIGMA, and how will it work: Inspired by a cipher device best known for its service during the early-to-mid 20th century, our dApp is to decipher the code to success! We are combining multiple widgets to uplift any user's experience. ◽️Telegram section: In the Telegram box, you will be receiving notifications from our CallerBot based on your keyword preferences selected in a 1v1 chat with it; ◽️Tracker s…
🔥6
🕊 Check out our new tweet! Like, share & RT! 🔥 Link: https://twitter.com/CallerInu/status/1604567947556659204?s=20&t=sanPXSnLSfFVdF_NpoHZgA
🔥5
Important information I wanted to share valuable information regarding our token and how it can be traded on the free market. Things are pretty simple. However, some might get things wrong, therefore the announcement! Our token is not and cannot be transformed into a honeypot or any other kind of scam. However, platforms such as Poocoin.app work in a simple way, which in our case, shows we are "untradeable." That'…
👌2❤1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CallerInuAnnChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 612,789 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CallerInu Announcement Channel” (@CallerInuAnnChannel), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CallerInuAnnChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.