Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐•ฎ๐—ฌ๐—š๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง.

@CYGNENT

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Advertising ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

462subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001878774135
TypeChannel
Username@CYGNENT
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CYGNENT

Growth

46246446313 Aug 2026, 19:37 โ€” 464 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 16:15 โ€” 462 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 19:3714 Aug 2026, 16:15
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 462โ€“464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:15462-2
13 Aug 2026, 19:37464first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 December 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค1630.2%
๐Ÿฅฐ1426.4%
๐Ÿ’‹59.43%
๐Ÿ”ฅ59.43%
๐Ÿ“35.66%
๐ŸŽ‰35.66%
๐Ÿณ23.77%
๐Ÿ’ฏ23.77%
๐Ÿ‘11.89%
๐Ÿ•Š11.89%
๐Ÿ˜11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 1 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid ยท 1 distinct token
Median views ยท ads
234
over 1 measured post
Median views ยท rest
303
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #ั€ะตะบะปะฐะผะฐ / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides โ€” nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means โ€œthe share of posts that declared themselvesโ€, never โ€œthe share of posts that were paid forโ€. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like โ€œads get x% fewer viewsโ€ โ€” an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2026010110121457451501030016651965576223111 January 20261 January 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry โ€” we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2025 to 1 January 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

1 Jan 2026, 08:21 UTC321 viewsread 13 August 2026

dahk yeahk, doa yg bike bike bwat smwnya smg di 2026 ini scene sedihnya dikit aj sisanya kita dugem

1 Jan 2026, 08:17 UTC326 viewsread 13 August 2026

mf dkit, tunggu aq kaya dlu nnti ak bliin iphone 28 promax

1 Jan 2026, 08:17 UTC329 viewsread 13 August 2026

NitroSeen [ENG]: โœ… 10000 coins successfully transferred to user 1441605527 on 2026/01/01 at 11:45:45 โœ… 10000 coins successfully transferred to user 7509532321 on 2026/01/01 at 11:46:3 โœ… 10000 coins successfully transferred to user 6179982377 on 2026/01/01 at 11:46:22 โœ… 10000 coins successfully transferred to user 1915408033 on 2026/01/01 at 11:46:43 โœ… 10000 coins successfully transferred to user 6551096072 on 202โ€ฆ

1 Jan 2026, 07:54 UTC258 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Surprisee! Ada hadiah spesial nih dari orang terfavoritnya kamu โค๏ธ (akulah pasti, iya kan?). Kamu bisa buka hadiahnya di GoPay App: https://app.gopay.co.id/NF8p/6arzhuka Eh, buruan dibuka ya, entar keburu hangus Semoga seneng, ya!

โค2๐Ÿฅฐ1

1 Jan 2026, 07:37 UTC234 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Advertisementerid 20260101101214574515010300166519655762231

Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ’ธ https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=s78nfqf97&r=cp1ha3&orderId=20260101101214574515010300166519655762231

โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿณ1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CYGNENT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 642,072 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐•ฎ๐—ฌ๐—š๐—ก๐—˜ ๐—˜๐—ก๐—ง.โ€ (@CYGNENT), 462 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CYGNENT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.