Channel
@CTradery
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
523subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002042064227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CTradery |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CTradery |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 523 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 526 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 526 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,539 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 1,539 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,539reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2024 to 28 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📈 CTSI CTSI/USDT на недельном таймфрейме тестирует нижнюю границу нисходящего треугольника — сильный уровень поддержки. Возможен отскок и отличная точка входа в лонг с целями на верхней границе фигуры. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳43
📈 API3 API3 тестирует нижнюю границу нисходящего треугольника на 2D графике. Ожидаю отскок от этого уровня и начало бычьего движения. Точка входа в лонг находится в зоне текущих цен. Первые цели — верхняя граница треугольника и ближайшие зоны сопротивления. Стоп-лосс целесообразно разместить ниже уровня поддержки, чтобы ограничить риски в случае пробоя вниз. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳54
📈 С98 C98/USDT тестирует нижнюю границу нисходящего треугольника на недельном таймфрейме. Ключевые моменты: - Зона поддержки: Уровень вокруг текущих цен может стать сильной точкой для отскока. - Потенциал роста: При подтверждении отскока есть шансы на переход в бычий тренд. - Стоп-лосс: Рекомендуется выставить стоп за уровнем поддержки для ограничения рисков. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳57
📈 BAL На недельном таймфрейме наблюдаем сформировавшуюся нисходящую линию сопротивления. Пробой этого уровня станет сигналом для активации покупателей, что может привести к развороту тренда. Следим за динамикой вблизи этого ключевого уровня. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳44
📈 По мере достижения BTC $105 000 — в сети его уже ждут по $276 000 "Эксперты" говорят, что BTC пробил фигуру “чашка с ручкой”, что, в свою очередь, может указывать на возможный рост к уровню $276 000 CT |Crypto Trade
🐳71
📈 HIGH Торгуется вблизи зоны поддержки на недельном таймфрейме. Выглядит хорошо, стоит купить. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳88
⚡ Анализ прошлых циклов биткоина показывает, что в первую неделю нового года обычно наблюдается рост, за которым следует резкий спад. После такого отката обычно начинается восходящий тренд, который продолжается примерно до марта. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳64
📈 ARB Повторно тестирует зону поддержки/сопротивления на 3D- графике. Идём вверх. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳55
🌟 Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) VIRTUAL стал одним из самых обсуждаемых ИИ-токенов последних недель. За месяц цена альткоина выросла на 150%, впервые превысив отметку $5 2 января. С рыночной капитализацией $4,2 млрд VIRTUAL обогнал таких конкурентов, как RENDER и TAO. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳56
📈 DOT Повторно тестирует паттерн нисходящего треугольника на недельном графике. Лонг. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳63
📈 Коррекция подходит к концу? Есть все основания полагать, что текущая коррекция на рынке скоро сменится ростом. Довольно четко это иллюстрируют волны Эллиотта. ❗️Уже сформировалась трехволновка A-B-C, после чего нас ожидает мощная третья восходящая волна. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳46
📈 ENS Повторно тестирует зону поддержки на недельном таймфрейме. Лонг. CT |Crypto Trade
🐳62
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CTradery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 555,720 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CT | Crypto Trade” (@CTradery), 523 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CTradery.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.