Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Маркетинг с бантиком 🎀

Channel

Маркетинг с бантиком 🎀

@CTRKPIitd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

215subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004439300857
TypeChannel
Username@CTRKPIitd
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 14 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CTRKPIitd

Growth

215216215.57 August 2026 — 216 subscribers7 August 2026 — 216 subscribers14 August 2026 — 215 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 215–216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:28215-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:30216no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:17216first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.4%
avg views ÷ 215 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.0
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (14 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,424
Reactions total262
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

351 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9226.2%
🥰4813.7%
🔥4212.0%
349.69%
🤣215.98%
💘123.42%
🦄113.13%
❤‍🔥92.56%
🍓92.56%
💅92.56%
👍82.28%
💯82.28%
😁82.28%
🤪82.28%
👾71.99%
🤯71.99%
😍51.42%
🌚30.855%
🫡30.855%
🏆20.57%
4 further kinds51.42%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC34 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Осторожнее, крышечка плохо держится…

💯5🤣5🤪4🔥21🐳1

4 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC43 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Зачем издательства покупают свои же книги?🫪 На маркетплейсах книга живёт в условиях жёсткой конкуренции: ежедневно появляются тысячи новинок. Алгоритмы площадок учитывают не только объём продаж, но и пользовательскую активность — оценки, отзывы, добавления в «Избранное». Чем выше вовлечённость вокруг издания, тем активнее алгоритмы продвигают его в рекомендации и тематические подборки. В издательстве иногда использ

6❤‍🔥4🤣4🏆1🐳1

3 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC63 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему мы продолжаем читать отзывы, хотя знаем, что им нельзя доверять? Перед покупкой книги, выбором ресторана или записью к врачу большинство из нас первым делом открывает отзывы. Хотя мы прекрасно понимаем, что часть из них может быть заказной, написанной конкурентами или просто необъективной. На первый взгляд это нелогично. Если источник ненадежный, зачем вообще тратить на него время? Ответ связан не столько с

4🔥4👍3

1 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC71 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Колобок против Человека-паука: битва, которой не было На этой неделе активно обсуждают новость: российским кинотеатрам рекомендовали перенести неофициальные показы нового «Человека-паука», чтобы отечественный фильм «Колобок» получил несколько недель без главного конкурента. У меня возник внутренний интересный вопрос. А насколько вообще эффективна стратегия, когда вместо усиления собственного продукта меняют конкуре

9🤯7🥰7

30 Jul 2026, 06:10 UTC102 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Ну не бросать же на 237-й странице. Осталось совсем немного». 📌 Если эта мысль хоть раз приходила вам в голову — поздравляю. Вы познакомились с ошибкой невозвратных затрат (sunk cost fallacy). Когда мы уже вложили во что-то время, деньги или силы, мозгу становится очень сложно отказаться от этого. Нам кажется, что если мы остановимся сейчас, то все предыдущие усилия были зря. Поэтому мы: 🟣 дочитываем скучную книг

10🔥5🤪4

28 Jul 2026, 08:51 UTC106 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎯 Почему одни книги становятся бестселлерами, а другие остаются незамеченными? Главная причина кроется не в качестве текста, а в том, как автор рассказывает о своей книге. Большинство писателей совершают одну и ту же ошибку — они говорят о СЕБЕ, когда читатель хочет услышать о СЕБЕ. Мозг человека устроен так, что мгновенно отсеивает информацию, которая не вызывает эмоционального отклика. Именно поэтому важно создав

7💘5🔥4🏆1💔1💯1

27 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC95 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Цена в директ 🌷✨

  1. Хорошо, напишу в директ 🌸12%
  2. Гляну в коменты, вдруг там кто-то написал 🙂47%
  3. Ой, да ну его… 😕88%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👾3🔥3🤣3😡1

27 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC93 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ошибка, которая безвозвратно убивает ваши продажи Пабло Эскобар озвучивал цену на кокаин по радио, а продавцы не могут стоимость костюма написать в посте… «Цена в директ🌷» — один из самых раздражающих форматов для покупателя. Почему бы просто не указать стоимость в описании или хотя бы на картинке? До сих пор такой метод продаж остается одной из самых спорных практик в онлайн- и офлайн-торговле. Чем же руководству

🥰5🤣43🌚3

25 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC102 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По первому образованию я журналист. И, наблюдая за тем, что происходит на рынке, могу сказать довольно уверенно: журналистика сегодня — это уже давно не про одну функцию. Писать текст стало только одной из множества задач. Современный журналист должен уметь быстро ориентироваться в теме, собирать фактуру, редактировать, адаптировать материал под разные площадки, понимать визуальную подачу, чувствовать аудиторию и пр

7💅6🥰5

23 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC87 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

FOMO — Fear of Missing Out, то есть «страх упустить что‑то важное». Звучит как очередное новомодное слово, а на деле — понятный психологический механизм: нам правда тревожно, когда кажется, что все вокруг что‑то получают, а мы остаёмся за бортом. Маркетинг во многом строится на знании поведенческой психологии человека. А потому – давно научился с этим работать, чтобы подсвечивать реальную ценность и помогать челове

96💅3🙏1

22 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC97 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. Татьянушка (@tatyanysca) ✔️Проверить результаты

🔥32

22 Jul 2026, 06:25 UTC125 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что автору нужно знать о продвижении книги в издательстве (и не только) 📕 Издательство — не рекламное агентство Не стоит рассчитывать, что команда сама сделает книгу бестселлером. Продвижение во многом — на плечах автора. Сразу обсудите с издательством зоны ответственности и реальные возможности: так вы избежите разочарований и спланируете свою часть работы. 🚀 Старт определяет судьбу книги Предзаказ и первые 3 меся

🥰5😍542🔥2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CTRKPIitd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

Цена в директ 🌷✨

  1. Хорошо, напишу в директ 🌸12%
  2. Гляну в коменты, вдруг там кто-то написал 🙂47%
  3. Ой, да ну его… 😕88%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 989,767 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маркетинг с бантиком 🎀” (@CTRKPIitd), 215 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CTRKPIitd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.