Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CSW Substark channel 2025 06

@CSWSubstark

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002760568183
TypeChannel
Username@CSWSubstark
DescriptionCSW Substark channel 2025 06 https://t.me/CSWSubstark Craig’s Substack https://substack.com/@cstominaga CSW Constitutional Observer (feb 2026) https://t.me/+tmuGa7MOgEFiOTE0
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/CSWSubstark

Growth

2011 Aug 2026, 16:47 — 20 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:00 — 20 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:4711 Aug 2026, 17:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:0020no change
11 Aug 2026, 16:4720first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
64
Videos
28
Links
677

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

31 May 2026, 23:46 UTC17 viewsread 11 August 2026
File

Pv4.1 No Existe Protocolo e Identidad: La Falacia de la Actualización de Redes 1 jun 2026 (Audio 20:58 min) Este texto de Craig Wright argumenta que un protocolo es un acuerdo rígido definido por sus reglas técnicas y no por su marca. El autor utiliza la transición histórica de IPv4 a IPv6 para demostrar que, cuando se altera la estructura fundamental de un sistema, se crea un sucesor incompatible y no una simple me

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

31 May 2026, 23:27 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026

Pv4.1 No Existe Protocolo e Identidad: La Falacia de la Actualización de Redes 1 jun 2026 (Audio 20:58 min) Este texto de Craig Wright argumenta que un protocolo es un acuerdo rígido definido por sus reglas técnicas y no por su marca. El autor utiliza la transición histórica de IPv4 a IPv6 para demostrar que, cuando se altera la estructura fundamental de un sistema, se crea un sucesor incompatible y no una simple me

Signed Ramon Quesada. † 🙏

26 May 2026, 19:52 UTC17 viewsread 11 August 2026
File

Contabilidad de Triple Entrada: El Nuevo Paradigma de la Evidencia. 26 may 2026 (Audio 23:39 min) La contabilidad de triple entrada no como un sistema de transparencia pública, sino como una herramienta avanzada de verificación de evidencia. El autor sostiene que su función principal es crear un registro compartido e inalterable que vincule las operaciones entre empresas sin exponer secretos comerciales. Mediante el

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

26 May 2026, 08:14 UTC18 viewsread 11 August 2026

Contabilidad de Triple Entrada: El Nuevo Paradigma de la Evidencia 26 may 2026 (Audio 23:39 min) Este texto analiza la contabilidad de triple entrada no como un sistema de transparencia pública, sino como una herramienta avanzada de verificación de evidencia. El autor sostiene que su función principal es crear un registro compartido e inalterable que vincule las operaciones entre empresas sin exponer secretos comerc

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

26 May 2026, 08:12 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

Triple-Entry Accounting Has Been Misunderstood The point was never to make accounting “transparent.” The point was to make evidence harder to forge, easier to reconcile, and more difficult to deny. Craig Wright May 26, 2026 https://singulargrit.substack.com/p/triple-entry-accounting-has-been

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

24 May 2026, 12:16 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

The Shortcut That Holds Up Modern Physics — and Where It Snaps Every fluid simulation ever run relies on a guess about information you can’t see. Two new results pin down, exactly, when that guess fails. Craig Wright May 24, 2026 https://open.substack.com/pub/singulargrit/p/the-shortcut-that-holds-up-modern

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

23 May 2026, 01:00 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026

Measuring the Shape of the Hottest Liquid in the Universe A new paper in Physical Review C introduces a geometric framework for the quark-gluon plasma — and opens a research programme that connects information theory, differential geometry, and nuclear physi Craig Wright May 22, 2026 https://open.substack.com/pub/singulargrit/p/measuring-the-shape-of-the-hottest

Signed Ramon Quesada. † 🙏

22 May 2026, 09:29 UTC11 viewsread 11 August 2026

Who Reads the Meter? The Hidden Trust Problem Underneath Every Energy Market That Runs on a Blockchain A peer-to-peer energy market pays you for the power you say you sent. The number it pays against comes from a meter you control. Craig Wright May 22, 2026 https://singulargrit.substack.com/p/who-reads-the-meter-the-hidden-trust

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

21 May 2026, 10:10 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026

Who Actually Controls a Blockchain? An Economist’s Map of the Power Structure On institutional separability, the dynamics of producer choice, and why the same protocol can produce two very different distributions of power. Craig Wright May 21, 2026 https://singulargrit.substack.com/p/who-actually-controls-a-blockchain

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

21 May 2026, 10:10 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026

The Miner Is Not a Monarch NAR, DAR, Property Rights, and the Legal-Economic Structure of Bitcoin Craig Wright May 20, 2026 https://singulargrit.substack.com/p/the-miner-is-not-a-monarch

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

19 May 2026, 11:14 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026

On the Constitutional and Operational Incoherence of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The Constitutional Observer May 19, 2026 https://the-constitutional-observer.ghost.io/on-the-constitutional-and-operational-incoherence-of-the-strategic-bitcoin-reserve/

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

19 May 2026, 11:13 UTC11 viewsread 11 August 2026

On the Constitutional and Operational Incoherence of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve the-constitutional-observer.ghost.io/on-the-constit…

Signed @RamonQuesada †🌷🙏

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CSWSubstark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 791,594 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CSW Substark channel 2025 06” (@CSWSubstark), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CSWSubstark.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.