Channel
@ZSGWJ666
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
729subscribers
+119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003205896595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ZSGWJ666 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ZSGWJ666 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 729 | +119 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 610 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 610 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ㅤ #频道互推 #频道推荐 ◈ 情侣酒店真实实录 ◈ AV解说中文字幕 ◈ ✨代理/高速节点/机场/加速器 ◈ PulseACG | 悸动次元 ◈ 4K AI Wallpaper ◈ 沙雕图文收录室😹 ◈ 「 叙事诗 」影像与文字 ✨ ◈ 快手精神小妹吃瓜2 ◈ 🍉 猹的快乐基地 ◈ 世界快讯·东南亚趣闻🌎 ◈ 🇩🇪德國精選生活素材 ◈ AI Pulse 日报 ㅤ ꕥ 国外话费充值 全网最低价 ꕥ 广告位招租 Powered by @PSDhutui_bot
Signed 🌈盘丝洞互推✨
🌟 小昼互推 接纳各种小频道 请不要删除此信息否则取消互推资格 1. 熬夜 2. 和平78\REX直装官方频道 3. 王者荣耀小土豆直装 4. 走不出的雨🌧️（学生🥚的天堂） 5. 七夜改文件官方频道🇨🇳 6. AS cheat MOD 🇨🇳 4\.5 7. RKR直装官方频道 8. 厚焰数据号\(不定期送号\) 9. 陈少改文件主频道 10. 小宇皮肤号🇨🇳 11. 寒冰数据号 12. 李宁公益官方🇨🇳 13. 无缘公益项目频道 14. 秋雨账号 和平账号 其他账号 15. 川少\(免费数据号\) 📌 共 76 个频道加入互推 📄 第 1/6 页
Signed 小昼互推_Bot
HD社工机器人 ------------------------- 功能: 综合查询 可查询 QQ号 微信号 手机号 等 ------------------------- 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 频道: https://t.me/xueluoqingyan 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
Signed 幻 接机器人开发
HD社工库😉 专业查询 可查询一下信息🔍 QQ 手机号码 身份证等 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 唯一要求 加入频道 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
Signed 幻 接机器人开发
HD社工库😉 专业查询 可查询一下信息🔍 QQ 手机号码 身份证等 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 唯一要求 加入频道 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
Signed 幻 接机器人开发
HD社工库😉 专业查询 可查询一下信息🔍 QQ 手机号码 身份证等 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 唯一要求 加入频道 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
Signed 幻 接机器人开发
HD社工库😉 专业查询 可查询一下信息🔍 QQ 手机号码 身份证等 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 唯一要求 加入频道 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
Signed 幻 接机器人开发
HD社工库😉 专业查询 可查询一下信息🔍 QQ 手机号码 身份证等 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 唯一要求 加入频道 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
👍1
Signed 幻
HD社工库😉 专业查询 可查询一下信息🔍 QQ 手机号码 身份证等 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 唯一要求 加入频道 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
Signed 幻
HD社工库😉 专业查询 可查询一下信息🔍 QQ 手机号码 身份证等 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 唯一要求 加入频道 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
Signed 幻
✉️你还在苦恼找不到Telegram优质资源而发愁吗 想找公益封号思路的频道？想找可以开户查档的频道？想找优质号商的频道？想找经常送福利可以白嫖各种账号 靓号 nft 红包的频道？ 🔗一键加入Telegram优质频道 点击我一键加入所有优质频道 点击我一键加入所有优质频道 点击我一键加入所有优质频道 😀这些频道是我收集许久的Telegram顶尖优质频道 加入这些频道不用花一毛钱就可以学到一堆思路 带走一堆福利 我们会过滤掉虚假信息、欺诈信息以及广告内容泛滥的频道，给各位一个最好的观感体验，不辜负每一个点击加入的朋友。你的信任，我的责任，给你一分信任，还你一分放心。 👑如果你的频道活人数量在200人以上 即刻联系 @vip_sgnb 发送你的频道链接 加入互推 互利互赢
Signed time 寒假自动回归
HD社工库😉 专业查询 可查询一下信息🔍 QQ 手机号码 身份证等 机器人: @HDSG1bot 只做免费不做收费❕ 唯一要求 加入频道 第一版测试 后续增加更多功能
Signed 幻
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ZSGWJ666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 292,796 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ZSGWJ666 named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“天辛主频道” (@ZSGWJ666), 729 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZSGWJ666.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.