Кто в Кску пойдет ММ сейчас
🥰1
Signed

Channel
@CREATINEDREDGE
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
492subscribers
+319 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002421869425 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CREATINEDREDGE |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CREATINEDREDGE |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 08:20 | 492 | -4 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 496 | -10 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 506 | +339 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 167 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 170 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 172 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 173 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 173 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
101 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 23.8% | |
| custom 5244550587659342034 | 23 | 22.8% | |
| custom 5395722222318945113 | 16 | 15.8% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 8.91% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| 🗿 | 5 | 4.95% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 3.96% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.99% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кто в Кску пойдет ММ сейчас
🥰1
Signed
Жду фидбэк после , кто сколько залутал, интересно даже
👌2🤝1
Signed
Вот, такие дела, Хамстер все же помнят или тот же Ноткоин? 😁 @sixsevenclub_bot Тут через неделю раздача токенов, фастиком нафармить и лутать
🔥2🤔1
Signed
Довольно прикольная книга, рассказывает о работе 2 систем в нашем мозге: 1️⃣ Система (Быстрое мышление): Работает на автопилоте, мгновенно и неосознанно. Она помогает нам отпрыгнуть от летящей на нас машины, прочитать эмоции на лице человека или автоматически умножить 2 на 2. Она тратит мало глюкозы, но часто ошибается 2️⃣ Система (Медленное мышление): Включается, когда нужно считать примеры, заполнять документы …
custom 52445505876593420343❤1
Signed ㅤ
Чем плох ОНАНИЗМ? Он вызывает выброс дофамина, эндорфина, после которого наступает удовольствие. Мозг запоминает это и привыкает, что "вот секрет счастья" Поэтому и есть те, кто занимается этим на ежедневной основе. После эйфории, как правило, наступает истощение, человек становится вялым, без желания что-либо полезное делать, добиваться чего либо. Мозг думает, что у него гарем из сотни женщин Цитата Арсена, к…
🗿5custom 53957222223189451134🍌3🌚1🤔1
Signed ㅤ
Запустил транслицию, если есть желание - буду рад видеть
custom 52445505876593420343custom 53957222223189451131
Signed ㅤ
Так-с, вчера, короче, не до этого было ЕГЭшка, все дела, йоу Метод - очень хороший, он строится на 3 вероятных исходах и, получается, прокрутив их в голове, представив всю картину, можно уже ментально и хоть как подготовиться ------------------------------------------- 5 реакций я просил, чтобы как пример построить 1 исход - Самое лучшее, что может быть: Вы набираете мне не 5 реакций, а намного больше или делае…
custom 52445505876593420348❤5custom 53957222223189451133
Signed ㅤ
Такое, кстати, в тиктоке видел. Так-то звучит прикольно, круто, но фигня, человеку такое несвойственно, как минимум, поэтому в следующем посте расскажу про другой метод, который активно использую в своей жизни насчёт ожиданий 5 реакций и будет пост😁
❤11custom 53957222223189451135💘4🔥4
Signed ㅤ
Всем привет. Надеюсь, у вас всё хорошо, вот, сейчас была курьезная ситуация: Вчера писал человек, скрин выше, я решил посмотреть, что и как. Мне скинули "контракт" , вроде чисто,если посмотреть со стороны, всё легко и понятно, ничего такого, почти согласился, но решил уточнить и глубже копнуть в аспекты, он заблокал. Грустненько, вот, что хочу сказать: Не верьте всему в интернете, вчитывайтесь, даже если всё к…
👍3
Signed ㅤ
Если такое пишите , то аргументы здравые приводите, я растолкую, а просто так - неинтересно , из-за ваших личных убеждений и неверием, вы лучше делом толковым займитесь и хомяка тапайте😁 Я даю халяву, а если вы не верите и думаете, что развод, ну, тут уже не знаю, что говорить
❤4🐳1
Signed ㅤ
А, ну и халява, каждый день крутите колесо, ежедневный приз забираете и копите алмазики.Может премка на 3 месяца выпасть Как народ будет, добавят много приколюх за эти алмазы, со слов Создателя, лично спрашивал, ибо я на него работал, знаком с ним немного, он такое поведал. А пока там только 2-3 человека претендуют на что-либо вообще, ОН среди их числа😁😁 @neocart_community_bot
custom 52445505876593420343
Signed ㅤ
Есть парочка вариантов, но я не скажу, ибо у вас желание в краткосрок появится, вы зайдете в тикток и забудете обо всем, но или лень будет чето делать Пока вы не вольетесь в процесс и реально не захотите, вам ничего не поможет , так , цитата: Незачем вытаскивать человека из пещеры, если он сам не хочет
🍓3
Signed ㅤ
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CREATINEDREDGE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У меня есть в канале люди, которые в инете бабки делают? Хотя бы 500 рублей
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Похоже ли на вас? Честно токо
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CREATINE DREDGE” (@CREATINEDREDGE), 492 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CREATINEDREDGE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.