Channel
@CORRECTIV_org
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
225subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001226181534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CORRECTIV_org |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CORRECTIV_org |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 225 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 227 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 228 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 229 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:11 | 229 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Sanktionen gegen Russland + Ist erben gerecht? + 300 Milliarden - https://t.co/kBtfafQm5a https://t.co/da7BCEdpTl— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 05:29PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Es wird Zeit, Bilanz zu ziehen: Wie konsequent werden Sanktionen umgesetzt? Wo werden Ausnahmen gemacht? Wie ist das Ergebnis eines Balanceaktes zwischen dem Schutz der deutschen Wirtschaft und den Strafmaßnahmen gegen den Kriegstreiber Russland? https://t.co/ONZaiKP1kl— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 04:54PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Es ist ein heikles Spannungsfeld: Sanktionen gegen Russland einerseits, die Abhängigkeit der EU vom russischen Gas andererseits. Welche Sanktionen verhängt werden, zeigt tagesaktuell unser Sanktionstracker: https://t.co/GIwKdpO51b— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 04:54PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
RT @Reporterfabrik: Weniger Auflage heißt weniger Erlös und weniger Personal. Mit den Auflagen schrumpfen Redaktionen - die Qualität und Lokalthemen leiden. Wie das mit dem #GOA22 ausgezeichnete Lokalnetzwerk von @correctiv_org gegensteuert, zeigt @jsachse im Workshop. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/jr05Gn11GP https://t.co/EAqdzHHXaf— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 02:59PM via Twitter https://twitter.c…
RT @ha_guggenberger: Uns auf Augenhöhe zur Klimakrise austauschen und lokale Lösungen entwickeln – das machen wir am 27. August beim #Klima-Barcamp von @correctiv_org! 🌱 Seid dabei in #Düsseldorf und meldet Euch hier an https://t.co/K4C25antlg https://t.co/aLJMMaRi3F— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 12:34PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Seit Beginn des Angriffskrieges kamen über 6500 Sanktionen gegen Russland dazu. Unser #Sanktionstracker bietet eine tagesaktuelle Übersicht über alle weltweit verhängten Sanktionen: https://t.co/GIwKdpO51b https://t.co/G0CrSEVrnc— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 12:04PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Oligarchen, Banken, Unternehmen – über 10.000 Sanktionen wurden mittlweile gegen Russland verhängt. Doch es gibt auch viele Ausnahmen und Maßnahmen werden inkonsequent umgesetzt. Wie wirkungsvoll sind die Sanktionen? Unsere Zwischenbilanz: https://t.co/ONZaiKP1kl— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 12:04PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Alle Sanktionen live im Überblick findet ihr hier: #Sanktionstracker https://t.co/GIwKdpO51b— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 09:33AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
RT @jeangleur: GuMo! Wie kann’s eigentlich sein, dass Russland über 10.000 Sanktionen abbekommt und trotzdem noch so stark ist? Was bringen sie und wo tun sie uns weh? Wir @correctiv_org haben versucht, es einzuordnen: https://t.co/azUGojQPGM— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 09:13AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Über 10.000 Sanktionen gegen Russland! Wir ziehen (Zwischen-) Bilanz: Was haben sie gebracht und welche deutschen Firmen machen weiter fleißig Geschäfte trotz des Krieges? https://t.co/ONZaiKP1kl— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 8, 2022 July 08, 2022 at 09:12AM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Lobbyist & Abgeordneter + Erfundene Impfkrankheit + Abtreibungen - https://t.co/wHIbB1UyF3 https://t.co/nFYUo26SbH— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 7, 2022 July 07, 2022 at 05:29PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Ihre unterschiedlichen Qualifikationen – investigative Recherche, Datenjournalismus und Engagement – die sie zu einem neuartigen Recherche-Team vereinen, haben die Jury überzeugt. Uns auch!— CORRECTIV (@correctiv_org) Jul 7, 2022 July 07, 2022 at 03:45PM via Twitter https://twitter.com/correctiv_org
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CORRECTIV_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CORRECTIV_org named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CORRECTIV - Recherchen für die Gesellschaft” (@CORRECTIV_org), 225 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CORRECTIV_org.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.