Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Газовая камера с фосгеном

Channel

Газовая камера с фосгеном

@COCI2COCI2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

500subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002674933449
TypeChannel
Username@COCI2COCI2
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/COCI2COCI2

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5005065037 August 2026 — 506 subscribers8 August 2026 — 506 subscribers8 August 2026 — 505 subscribers14 August 2026 — 504 subscribers20 August 2026 — 503 subscribers28 August 2026 — 502 subscribers15 September 2026 — 500 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 499–507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 09:17500-2
28 Aug 2026, 17:36502-1
20 Aug 2026, 19:23503-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:28504-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:52505-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:16506no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:18506first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

559 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥15327.4%
🤩13023.3%
🥰11119.9%
🔥6511.6%
😱356.26%
234.11%
👍101.79%
🤔71.25%
🌭40.716%
😈40.716%
🤝40.716%
💘30.537%
💯30.537%
👏20.358%
😭20.358%
🐳10.179%
🙏10.179%
🦄10.179%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 559 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @COCI2COCI2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 January 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC222 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Этот канал стоит вашего внимания, думайте.

6😈4💘1

1 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC231 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, рекомендую вам подписаться на телеграм-канал Артёма Гуляева - победа Всероса по химии, золотого медалиста Межнара по химии и выпускника Кембриджа. Артём уже четыре года преподаёт олимпиадную химию, так что он отлично знает, какие темы для олимпиадников – самые сложные, а какие просто плохо объясняют в школах и на сборах. Именно эти темы он и разбирает простым и увлекательным языком в своём канале. Например,

2🔥2👍1

25 Jul 2026, 20:32 UTC388 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Все таки скоро что то будет, я переношу свою лабу, возможностей стало больше соответственно и синтезов тоже, поэтому можно заняться плотной варкой всякого шлака ( орга🫩 )

🥰16🔥4❤‍🔥3💘1

6 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTC≈1,200 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Создал канал с разного рода реакциями ( орга-неорга ) https://t.me/kaishebdnsiauwh

❤‍🔥6🤩4🥰21💘1

9 Jun 2026, 12:48 UTC≈1,130 views31 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Че это такое

🤩22❤‍🔥5🥰2🐳1🦄1

28 Mar 2026, 11:28 UTC≈1,640 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

( можете типо накинуть идей че мне сделать с четырехуглеродным говном )

❤‍🔥187🥰6🤩2

28 Mar 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,250 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ниче интересного, перегонка butanола 2

🔥17❤‍🔥5🤔5🤩31🥰1😱1🙏1

17 Mar 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,230 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ыыыы В ближашие дни чето да сделаю

😱22❤‍🔥9🔥32🥰2

9 Mar 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,450 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кристаллы салициловой кислоты. Насчет этилсалицилата, его получилось немного. Запах у него прикольный, одновременно вкусный и аптечный

🤩23❤‍🔥4🔥32🥰2👍1

8 Mar 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,030 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Колбогрей за 500 рублей сделал🤩 Короче, этилсалицилат из аспирина дэлаю, выход безупречный будет☝️

❤‍🔥18🥰6😱6🔥2

7 Mar 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,100 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нет, ну правда

❤‍🔥23🌭4🥰41🔥1

7 Mar 2026, 16:37 UTC960 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это надежно…Правда… Если че я перегоняю адреналин

🤩25❤‍🔥5🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @COCI2COCI2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Газовая камера с фосгеном” (@COCI2COCI2), 500 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/COCI2COCI2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.