Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝙲𝙼𝙷 𝙲𝙾𝙽𝙵𝙴𝚂𝚂𝙸𝙾𝙽𝚂.🩸

@CMHell_cf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

81subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002275612295
TypeChannel
Username@CMHell_cf
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CMHell_cf

Growth

8111 Aug 2026, 13:17 — 81 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:48 — 81 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:1711 Aug 2026, 22:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:4881no change
11 Aug 2026, 13:1781first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢1343.3%
🔥826.7%
723.3%
🍓13.33%
💘13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2025 to 31 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CMHell_cf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2025 to 31 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2025, 16:31 UTC365 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ьля сорян что ьольше нтхуя не выложили как нибудь я этим займусь

😢13

20 Jul 2025, 20:16 UTC517 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

вы попались на кликбейт так шо въебите подпис.очку🖤 @glmrscumbagg @glmrscumbagg @glmrscumdagg ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

🔥5

20 Jul 2025, 20:14 UTC422 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Cr: @Lilili_lol ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

🔥21🍓1

20 Jul 2025, 20:14 UTC293 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Эмо няшечка cr: @mryashina77 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

20 Jul 2025, 20:14 UTC219 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

тгк: https://t.me/eekukusi ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

💘1

20 Jul 2025, 20:13 UTC187 views2 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Дк: @mikser_83 тгк Руслан: @vaasi1ek тт ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

2

20 Jul 2025, 20:13 UTC143 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

эмо мода cr: @ssenovozzz ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

20 Jul 2025, 20:13 UTC125 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/bbb11kedd ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

1

20 Jul 2025, 20:12 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

пр тгк– https://t.me/+5TNFpHM2OLwxZGMy ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

1

20 Jul 2025, 20:12 UTC105 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Привет татушки у него крутые да @mryashina77 🧑 - крутые ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

1🔥1

20 Jul 2025, 20:11 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

сэмэнж❤️❤️❤️ пж поддержите начинающего художника подпиской на его тгк: https://t.me/kilkaXuilkaXD ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

1

20 Jul 2025, 20:11 UTC83 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

нежнятина получилась кр : : https://t.me/DavveKnasosal/18002 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #арт #тейк || @CMHellCF_bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CMHell_cf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 933,458 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙲𝙼𝙷 𝙲𝙾𝙽𝙵𝙴𝚂𝚂𝙸𝙾𝙽𝚂.🩸” (@CMHell_cf), 81 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CMHell_cf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.