Channel
@CLN_resistenza
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
504subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001908588723 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CLN_resistenza |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CLN_resistenza |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 504 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 504 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,307 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 70.4% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
GIUSTIZIA UGUALE PER TUTTI? Caso Delmastro, il centrodestra ferma i magistrati: l'immunità diventa un bavaglio all'inchiesta. Il voto della Camera sulle chat di Andrea Delmastro solleva interrogativi profondi sulla trasparenza delle nostre istituzioni e sul principio di uguaglianza dei cittadini davanti alla legge. La giustificazione del Governo e della maggioranzaI partiti di centrodestra difendono il voto richiam…
⤵️ 1- Nessun intento persecutorio: La Procura di Roma non stava spiando un parlamentare. Quelle chat WhatsApp sono state trovate sul telefono sequestrato a un ristoratore già condannato come prestanome della camorra. Perché i magistrati non possono usarle? 2- Sfera privata vs Attività politica: L'immunità parlamentare è nata per difendere la libertà politica e di voto dei deputati da persecuzioni giudiziarie, non pe…
👍2❤1
IT’S AVIANO: IL MARKETING DEL COMBATTIMENTO CHE TRASFORMA LA GUERRA IN SOUVENIR Bisogna avere un bel coraggio, o una spaventosa dose di ipocrisia, per lanciare un brand territoriale intitolato: “It’s Aviano. Il Paese con la Base". Il Comune, sostenuto dalla Regione verso Pordenone 2027, ha deciso di fare marketing su una struttura militare. Hanno persino finanziato un documentario dal titolo imbarazzante: "United S…
❤2
⤵️ Eppure, l'identità storica di Aviano è stata svenduta: -Cancellato il Beato Marco d’Aviano, il "medico spirituale d'Europa" che tre secoli fa cercava di unire ciò che le guerre dividevano. -Ignorato il CRO, dove si combatte davvero, ma per salvare vite umane.(Istituto di cura e ricerca sul cancro più importanti e prestigiosi d'Italia). -Dimenticato il Piancavallo, la natura e le malghe. Oggi l'eccellenza da sband…
😱3🤬1
L’ITALIA È IN GUERRA E IL GOVERNO LO NASCONDE AI CITTADINI: IL GRANDE INGANNO DELLA “TASK FORCE AIR-ARABIA” Mentre l'opinione pubblica viene distratta, il governo italiano ha silenziosamente proiettato il nostro Paese all'interno di un pericoloso teatro di guerra nel Golfo Persico. È UN DATO DI FATTO: L’ITALIA È ENTRATA UFFICIALMENTE IN UN CONFLITTO. La cosa più grave, che rappresenta un insulto alla democrazia, è c…
⤵️ La premessa temporale: un'azione a comando di Washington! Per comprendere la totale malafede politica di questa operazione, basta analizzare la linea del tempo. Appena due settimane dopo l'attacco unilaterale sferrato dall'amministrazione Trump contro l'Iran, questo governo ha istituito d'urgenza il dispositivo militare (avviato ufficialmente nella seconda metà di marzo 2026). Questo dettaglio cronologico smascher…
Il governo, legando a filo doppio i nostri assetti a quelli americani, ha trasformato le nostre città e le nostre installazioni in potenziali linee di tiro per le forze avversarie. L'Articolo 11 della Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana (approvata il 22 dicembre 1947) è chiaro e non ammette interpretazioni di comodo: «L'Italia ripudia la guerra come strumento di offesa alla libertà degli altri popoli e come mezzo…
LISTE D’ATTESA VADEMECUM Quando si prenotano visite ed esami dal Cup regionale o della Asl dovete verificare se i tempi massimi previsti nella ricetta vengono garantiti. In caso contrario la legge sulle liste d’attesa approvata nel 2024 prevede che il cittadino sia tutelato con i cosiddetti percorsi di garanzia: in pratica il Cup deve trovare un posto in intramoenia – cioè dentro l’ospedale o l’ambulatorio pubblico…
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1isfx3EGvx/?mibextid=wwXIfr
‼️𝐕𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐈𝐍𝐈 & 𝐏𝐑𝐎𝐓𝐄𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐒𝐏𝐈𝐊𝐄‼️ R𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐟. 𝐏𝐚𝐨𝐥𝐨 𝐁𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝 - 𝟐𝟏 𝐋𝐮𝐠𝐥𝐢𝐨 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔 👉𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐞: https://youtu.be/CZxlD17ygus?is=S0E8m-sfOqrA2l-T
👍3
Questo il video integrale L’OMICIDIO DI FAKIR A tutte le persone che sono state capaci di vomitare consenso verso l’operato della polizia e, peggio ancora, verso l’indifferenza degli operatori e il medico della croce rossa che avrebbe potuto sedare Fakir! (Il medico poteva agire d'urgenza applicando l'articolo 54 del Codice Penale (Stato di Necessità) e questo avviene quando una persona, in stato di agitazione/alte…
👍5❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CLN_resistenza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,064,933 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RESISTENZA CLN” (@CLN_resistenza), 504 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CLN_resistenza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.