доброе утро
custom 53687853986192066236❤1

Channel
@CHHARLLU3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
202subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001596438416 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CHHARLLU3 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CHHARLLU3 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 202 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 201 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 201 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,100 |
| Reactions total | 480 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
480 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368785398619206623 | 110 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5472141767962820437 | 68 | 14.2% | |
| custom 5463294234117303391 | 54 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5474622867490504133 | 53 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5199886892035761856 | 52 | 10.8% | |
| 🕊 | 50 | 10.4% | |
| 🍓 | 35 | 7.29% | |
| custom 5287490803101359051 | 33 | 6.88% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 3.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 0.833% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 480reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CHHARLLU3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
доброе утро
custom 53687853986192066236❤1
нет, потом, они отдохнут и будет как раньше поцелуй за ухом с утреца
🕊7❤1custom 53687853986192066231
студенты Достозаи неделю живут вместе но Дазай три дня лежит в кровати не вставая а Достоевский перемещается до компьютера и обратно, периодически проверяя дышит ли еще Осаму. сил нет ни у кого 😭 они вроде живут вместе, но вымотались настолько, что не разговаривают, а только иногда бросают друг на друга безответные взгляды. не смотрят друг другу в глаза. Дазай утыкается лицом в подушку и спит так пока воздух не за…
🕊9custom 54746228674905041334custom 54721417679628204373❤1custom 53687853986192066231
достозаи в остывшей кровавой ванне и Достоевский, выбивающий остатки жизни из партнера делающий еще один и еще один надрез. нащупывая руками мышцы, пачкаясь в крови ведя беседу про Искусство или про Христа, но не серьёзное, а что-то отвлеченное, заставляя поддерживать диалог и не терять сознание совсем. вдруг ласковые обращения и нежность, снова заставляющая сфокусироваться на глазах человека напротив. клонит в со…
🕊9custom 53687853986192066234custom 54746228674905041333
с ума сойти один человек до двухста 😱😱 чего вы хотите в честь этого?
custom 546329423411730339115❤🔥4🍓2
🤩ну что ты мой маленький
custom 547214176796282043727custom 536878539861920662311custom 546329423411730339110🕊2custom 51998868920357618562custom 54746228674905041331
🤩 други мне не понравилось так что оставлю так хорошо
custom 519988689203576185624custom 54632942341173033918custom 54721417679628204376❤1
один сейчас или два потом
custom 53687853986192066239custom 54632942341173033912
спасибо за актив за звёздчки за комментарии ❤️🩹 это очень поддерживает и мотивирует у меня к вам сразу два вопроса 1) что бы вы хотели тут видеть еще/чаще? (мейби какие-то активности) 2) вас интересует ТОЛЬКО бсд здесь? (мой фикс никуда не делся, интересуюсь прст)
custom 536878539861920662322🕊6❤4custom 52874908031013590512custom 54746228674905041331
🖕
🍓33custom 547214176796282043715custom 546329423411730339113💋2🕊2custom 53687853986192066232custom 54746228674905041332
🅿️🅰🆑ℹ️🏧🅿️🅰 🅿️🅾 Ⓜ️🆙🔠🅱🆗🅿️🔠🆙 10 художник, 5 писателей (возможно увеличу количество) Каждому даётся мудборд с основополагющим цветом (белый, красный, жёлтый и тому подобное) Ваша задача - нарисовать арт/написать зарисовку по мудборду (придерживаясь основного цвета - для художников) (!)Только персонажи бсд Для участия ●рт поста к себе в канал/3 друзьям ●3-5 своих работ в комментариях с указанием ссылки/юза канала Наб…
custom 53687853986192066236
😱 ого спасибо за звёздочки! а вообще надеюсь вы рады такому августовскому активу
custom 519988689203576185615custom 52874908031013590516custom 53687853986192066234❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CHHARLLU3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 122,860 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“до полудня❕” (@CHHARLLU3), 202 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CHHARLLU3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.