Channel
@CFDolphins
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001949378351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CFDolphins |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CFDolphins |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 136 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 136 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
140 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 76 | 54.3% | |
| 🐳 | 19 | 13.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 10.0% | |
| 🏆 | 13 | 9.29% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 4.29% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 3.57% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.86% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.714% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.714% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.714% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2025 to 14 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⏳ Уже сегодня решаются судьбы сезона PFML 2025! ⏳ 🔥Атмосфера обещает быть особенной — решающие игры всегда пишут историю. Не пропусти шанс увидеть всё вживую! 📌16:30 — матч за 3-е место: СОЮЗ vs SMACK 📌18:00 — ФИНАЛ: CF “Dolphins” vs Peterhof Wolves 🗓Дата: 14 сентября ⏰Время: 16:30 и 18:00 📍Место: Собственный проспект, 18 PFML | ФРИБЕТ 3.000₽ 🏆
❤7
Signed LexaBalance
Дорогие друзья! ⚠️У нас радостная новость: «Дельфины» в третий сезон подряд выходят в финал ПФМЛ! 🐺Их соперниками, не побоимся этого слова, сенсационно стали «Волки», которые неожиданно для всех выбили из борьбы «Смак» в полуфинале. Интересно, что каждый сезон наша команда обязательно встречалась с «Волками», но завершала чемпионат матчем с другим противником. В этом сезоне получилось иначе: игра «Дельфины» – «Вол…
❤8❤🔥5🍌4
Матч за 3-е место PFML 2025⚽️ Перед финалом нас ждёт не менее горячее противостояние — игра за бронзовые медали СОЮЗ vs SMACK 📌Для Союза это шанс завершить сезон на мажорной ноте и доказать, что команда способна бороться за самые высокие позиции. 📌Для SMACK — возможность оправиться после драматичного поражения в полуфинале и увезти с собой хотя бы бронзу. Обе команды заряжены только на победу, а значит нас ждёт з…
Signed LexaBalance
⚡️Финал PFML 2025 — Peterhof Wolves vs CF “Dolphins”⚡️ Главный матч сезона уже совсем близко! В финале сойдутся две команды, которые прошли абсолютно разными путями, но каждая из них заслужила место в решающем противостоянии Peterhof Wolves — сенсация плей-офф. Волки впервые в своей истории пробились в финал, вырвав победу у SMACK в одном из самых драматичных матчей сезона (4:3) CF “Dolphins” — команда, которая п…
❤5🫡1
Signed LexaBalance
Кто одержит победу в финале?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ждем именно тебя на решающем матче!🫵🏼🔥 💥 Дорогие болельщики, настало время полуфиналов! Наша команда CF Dolphins продолжает свое победное шествие и снова в шаге от триумфа! 🥊 На прошлой неделе мы уверенно разгромили Anti-Coalition и с высоко поднятой головой вышли в полуфинал. Но главная битва еще впереди! Жаркая игра ждет нас: CF Dolphins vs СОЮЗ! ⭐️ Помните то незабываемое финальное противостояние в PFML прошло…
❤10❤🔥9🤩6
Signed LexaBalance
Какой будет финал ❓
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed LexaBalance
Вчера завершились четвертьфиналы PFML ⚽️ CF “Dolphins” оформили уверенную победу 6:0 над Anti-Coalition и подтвердили статус одного из фаворитов турнира Pererhof Wolves вырвали путёвку в полуфинал в невероятно упорной игре против Досочных. Победитель определился только в серии буллиталти, где Волки оказались сильнее и впервые в своей истории пробились в 1/2 финала 💥 На предстоящей неделе нас ждут два полуфинальных…
Signed LexaBalance
Дорогие болельщики нашей любимой команды!!! ❗️Наша команда уверенно вышла в плей-офф третьего сезона ПФМЛ❗️ 🔥В соперники нам достался крепкий коллектив Anti-Coalition🔥 ✅Наши соперники успели попасть в последний вагон и вышли в плей-офф с 8-го места, но это не говорит о том, что для Дельфинов матч будет лёгкой прогулкой ✅ 🐬Наш состав пополнил ряд новых футболистов, которые добавят глубины состава, тк на протяжении все…
❤8
Signed LexaBalance
Кто по-вашему мнению поднимет 🏆 над головой?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Signed LexaBalance
Представляем вашему вниманию сетку плей-офф PFML 2025 ⚽️ Важно отметить: • В отличие от регулярного сезона, при удалении игрока за красную карточку команда будет играть в меньшинстве — замены не будет. • Организаторы лиги постараются записать каждый матч, чтобы избежать спорных моментов. • Все игры будут проводиться в привычном формате (не от штрафной до штрафной). • На финал и матч за 3-е место будут назначены дво…
❤2
Signed LexaBalance
До конца регулярного сезона осталась ровно неделя. Плей-офф стартует 25 августа. Взглянем на таблицу ⚽️ CF “Dolphins” снова проходят сезон без поражений и сохраняют за собой первое место Peterhof Wolves гарантировали себе место в тройке. Пока они занимают вторую строчку, но их ещё может обогнать Союз, у которого два матча в запасе С 4-го по 9-е место продолжается плотная борьба — все будет решаться в последних тур…
🔥4❤1👍1
Signed LexaBalance
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CFDolphins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто одержит победу в финале?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой будет финал ❓
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто по-вашему мнению поднимет 🏆 над головой?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2025 to 14 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 386,550 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CF Dolphins - Media” (@CFDolphins), 136 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CFDolphins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.