Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for درمان شناختی-رفتاری (CBT)

Channel

درمان شناختی-رفتاری (CBT)

@CBTtoday

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

574subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001358178724
TypeChannel
Username@CBTtoday
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CBTtoday

Growth

5525745639 August 2026 — 552 subscribers10 August 2026 — 552 subscribers17 August 2026 — 568 subscribers24 August 2026 — 574 subscribers9 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 549–577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 12:06574+6
17 Aug 2026, 09:37568+16
10 Aug 2026, 00:00552no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:47552first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.05%
avg views ÷ 574 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total580
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC9 viewsread 10 August 2026

🔆 #سخن_بزرگان #کارل_راجرز ما نمی‌توانیم تغییر کنیم و نمی‌توانیم از آن‌چه هستیم فاصله بگیریم، مگر آن‌که به‌طور کامل آن‌چه را هستیم بپذیریم. آن‌گاه به نظر می‌رسد که تغییر تقریباً بدون این‌که متوجه شویم، رخ می‌دهد. — کارل راجرز ‌ We cannot change, we cannot move away from what we are, until we thoroughly accept what we are. Then change seems to come about almost unnoticed. – Carl Rogers 🔰 کانال «درمان شناختی-رفتاری» @

9 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026

#خطاهای_رایج در کاربست CBT ❌ خطای ۳۵: اشتباه گرفتن «حل مسئله» با «نشخوار فکری» گاهی مراجع ساعت‌ها درباره‌ی یک مشکل فکر می‌کند و درمانگر نیز این فرایند را به‌عنوان «فکر کردن برای پیدا کردن راه‌حل» در نظر می‌گیرد. اما نشخوار فکری معمولاً به تکرار ذهنیِ گذشته، «چرا»های بی‌پایان و تحلیل بدون اقدام منجر می‌شود. ✅ رویکرد درست: بررسی کنید که فکر کردن مراجع به اقدام منجر می‌شود یا نه. از او بپرسید: - «این فکر کردن در نهای

9 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

#چالش_تشخیص: ❓۲۴: فرد می‌گوید: «اگر عدد ۱۳ را ببینم، احتمال دارد اتفاق بدی برای خانواده‌ام بیافتد؛ بنابراین همیشه سعی می‌کنم از این عدد دوری کنم.» خودش نیز می‌داند ارتباط منطقی مشخصی میان عدد و حادثه وجود ندارد. مناسب‌ترین اصطلاح برای این پدیده چیست؟

  1. الف) ایده‌ی انتساب33%
  2. ب) هذیان گزند و آسیب17%
  3. ج) فکر جادویی50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC21 viewsread 10 August 2026

#اخلاق_حرفه‌ای: 🔑 ۱۷: پرونده‌ی مراجع را به هر کسی نشان ندهید. داشتن دسترسی به اطلاعات مراجع، به‌معنای داشتن حق مشاهده‌ی آن نیست. اطلاعات پرونده باید فقط در اختیار افرادی قرار گیرد که برای انجام وظیفه‌ی حرفه‌ای خود واقعاً به آن نیاز دارند و محرمانگی باید در تمام مراحل حفظ شود. 🔰 کانال «درمان شناختی-رفتاری» @CBTtoday

9 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC29 viewsread 10 August 2026

💬 #کلام_درمانگر ۱۲: مراجع: «وقتی یه نفر جوابم رو نمی‌ده، اول فکر می‌کنم از من ناراحت شده. بعد شروع می‌کنم پیام‌های قبلی‌مون رو دوباره خوندن تا ببینم کجا اشتباه کردم.» درمانگر CBT چه می‌گوید؟ الف) «این کار فقط اضطراب‌تون رو بیش‌تر می‌کنه.» ب) «احتمالاً ترس از طرد شدن دارید.» ج) «از این به بعد پیام‌های قبلی رو نخونید.» د) «بیایید دقیق‌تر بررسی کنیم: بعد از این‌که پیام‌های قبلی رو دوباره می‌خونید، آیا به اطمینان می‌رس

9 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC25 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

#چالش_CBT: ❓۵۷: درمانگر پس از چند جلسه متوجه می‌شود مراجع در بازسازی شناختی بسیار موفق است، اما در موقعیت‌های واقعی همچنان همان رفتارهای اجتنابی را انجام می‌دهد. بهترین تصمیم چیست؟

  1. الف) ادامه‌ی بازسازی شناختی تا زمانی که تمام افکار کاملاً منطقی شوند.8%
  2. ب) انتقال تمرکز درمان به مداخلات رفتاری و آزمودن باورها در موقعیت واقعی.92%
  3. ج) پایان درمان، زیرا مراجع از نظر شناختی پیشرفت کرده است.0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026

#مهارت‌های_مشاوره 💢 ۱۴. آزمون واقعیت (Reality Testing) مراجع: مطمئنم اگه در جلسه حرف بزنم، همه متوجه می‌شن که اطلاعاتم کمه. درمانگر: بیایید فرض کنیم این اتفاق افتاد؛ چه شواهدی داریم که نشان می‌ده همه‌ی افراد حاضر چنین برداشتی خواهند داشت؟ (آزمون واقعیت) مراجع: واقعاً شواهدی برای «همه» ندارم؛ شاید فقط دارم بدترین حالت رو تصور می‌کنم. 🔰 کانال «درمان شناختی-رفتاری» @CBTtoday

9 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC22 viewsread 10 August 2026

#نکته_CBT: 💎 ۶۳: هر فکر منفی، لزوماً «فکر ناکارآمد» نیست. مراجع ممکن است واقعاً با احتمال شکست، طرد یا پیامد ناخوشایند مواجه باشد. قبل از بازسازی شناختی بپرسید: «آیا مشکل در محتوای این فکر است یا در شیوه‌ی پاسخ دادن مراجع به آن؟» گاهی هدف درمان، تغییر واقعیت فکر نیست؛ بلکه تغییر واکنش رفتاری و هیجانی به آن است. 🔰 کانال «درمان شناختی-رفتاری» @CBTtoday

9 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC32 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

#واژگان_روان‌شناسی: ❓معنی واژه‌ی morality چیست؟

  1. روحیه35%
  2. اخلاق53%
  3. تقابل12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC29 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🖼️ #تصویر_مفهومی 🔰 کانال «درمان شناختی-رفتاری» @CBTtoday

9 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC28 viewsread 10 August 2026

💠 #شعر #مولانا راهِ لذت از درون دان، نه از برون - مولانا 🔰 کانال «درمان شناختی-رفتاری» @CBTtoday

8 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#خطاهای_رایج در کاربست CBT ❌ خطای ۳۴: نادیده گرفتن پیامدهای مثبتِ کوتاه‌مدتِ رفتار مشکل‌ساز گاهی درمانگر فقط به پیامدهای منفیِ یک رفتار توجه می‌کند و نمی‌پرسد «این رفتار در کوتاه‌مدت چه فایده‌ای برای مراجع دارد؟» برای مثال، مراجع از تماس گرفتن با دیگران اجتناب می‌کند. نتیجه‌ی منفی، تنهایی بیش‌تر است؛ اما در کوتاه‌مدت، اجتناب باعث کاهش اضطراب او می‌شود. اگر این پاداش کوتاه‌مدت را نبینیم، دلیل تداوم رفتار را به‌خوبی

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CBTtoday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz12 voters

#چالش_تشخیص: ❓۲۴: فرد می‌گوید: «اگر عدد ۱۳ را ببینم، احتمال دارد اتفاق بدی برای خانواده‌ام بیافتد؛ بنابراین همیشه سعی می‌کنم از این عدد دوری کنم.» خودش نیز می‌داند ارتباط منطقی مشخصی میان عدد و حادثه وجود ندارد. مناسب‌ترین اصطلاح برای این پدیده چیست؟

  1. الف) ایده‌ی انتساب33%
  2. ب) هذیان گزند و آسیب17%
  3. ج) فکر جادویی50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz12 voters

#چالش_CBT: ❓۵۷: درمانگر پس از چند جلسه متوجه می‌شود مراجع در بازسازی شناختی بسیار موفق است، اما در موقعیت‌های واقعی همچنان همان رفتارهای اجتنابی را انجام می‌دهد. بهترین تصمیم چیست؟

  1. الف) ادامه‌ی بازسازی شناختی تا زمانی که تمام افکار کاملاً منطقی شوند.8%
  2. ب) انتقال تمرکز درمان به مداخلات رفتاری و آزمودن باورها در موقعیت واقعی.92%
  3. ج) پایان درمان، زیرا مراجع از نظر شناختی پیشرفت کرده است.0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTCAnonymous Quiz17 voters

#واژگان_روان‌شناسی: ❓معنی واژه‌ی morality چیست؟

  1. روحیه35%
  2. اخلاق53%
  3. تقابل12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz19 voters

#چالش_تشخیص: ❓۲۳: مراجع در جلسه‌ی درمان می‌گوید: «می‌دونم این فکر منطقی نیست، اما هربار دستگیره‌ی در رو لمس می‌کنم، تصویری ناخواسته از آلوده شدن خانواده‌م به ذهنم می‌آد.» این تجربه بیش‌تر با کدام نشانه مطابقت دارد؟

  1. الف) وسواس فکری89%
  2. ب) هذیان گزند و آسیب11%
  3. ج) افکار بیش‌ارزش‌داده‌شده0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz21 voters

#چالش_CBT: ❓۵۶: مراجعی با افسردگی می‌گوید: «هیچ فعالیتی برام لذت‌بخش نیست، بنابراین برنامه‌ریزی فعالیت فایده‌ای نداره.» درمانگر کدام اقدام را مناسب‌تر می‌داند؟

  1. الف) منتظر بماند تا لذت و انگیزه برگردد.5%
  2. ب) فعالیت‌ها را بر اساس لذت احتمالی و احساس تسلط برنامه‌ریزی و نتایج را پایش کند.86%
  3. ج) ابتدا تمام افکار منفی درباره‌ی فعالیت را اصلاح کند.10%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz22 voters

#واژگان_روان‌شناسی: ❓معنی واژه‌ی aquaphobia چیست؟

  1. آب‌هراسی64%
  2. آتش‌هراسی14%
  3. آسیب‌هراسی23%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,336,080 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“درمان شناختی-رفتاری (CBT)” (@CBTtoday), 574 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CBTtoday.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.