Channel
@CAMERAPW
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
326subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002544992542 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CAMERAPW |
| Created | 31 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CAMERAPW |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 326 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 329 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 325 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 320 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 320 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 31 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5323486107965354246 | 59 | 64.8% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 27.5% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.10% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2025 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CAMERAPW. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2025 to 25 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Heard about some fresh vulnerabilities on XMeye. Not 100% sure they're real and I'm not gonna poke at them anyway (no OSD access). That said, I'd seriously consider switching to some decent cameras instead.
custom 53234861079653542464
Hi, just to be clear - I have no malicious intentions and I'm not trying to exploit or attack anything. I just scan for devices with open ports that are publicly accessible from the internet. When I find one, I'll send a short warning message so the owner knows their printer (or network) is exposed and needs to be secured. You should close those open ports or ask your IT guy to do it. Updating the firmware probably w…
custom 53234861079653542469❤2🤨1🥰1
Video, posted without a caption
❤19custom 532348610796535424612🙏1
ENG: Aside from Hikvision and Dahua, there are plenty of other Chinese cameras-the kind that run through apps like Yoosee, EZVIZ, and the like. The thing is, they’re so easy to set up, even your grandma could do it, and they’re dirt cheap. The catch? Hikvision actually opens ports (making setup harder and support patchy), but these other cameras connect straight to... Chinese servers. If you can see your camera, so c…
custom 53234861079653542467
ENG: Fun fact: there have actually been cases where intercom systems were accidentally hacked. At first, it might not seem like a big deal-maybe the door doesn’t open, or the intercom makes weird noises. Annoying, sure. But here’s where it gets creepy: what’s stored inside these systems. We’re talking databases full of people’s faces-often conveniently labeled with phone numbers. Not so funny now, right? It's actuall…
custom 53234861079653542466😱2
ENG: Many people likely didn’t realize what those messages on the cameras meant. Don’t worry - I can’t see your cameras or anything like that (and I wouldn’t, for ethical reasons). Still, it’s clear that some people who’ve noticed those messages are just script kiddies misusing research tools. (The screenshot is an example; the actual message differs.) RUS: Многие, вероятно, не поняли, что означают эти сообщения на …
custom 53234861079653542465🔥1🤡1
Whoops, my bad! 😢
custom 532348610796535424616❤4
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @CAMERAPW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Camera Pwned❤️” (@CAMERAPW), 326 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CAMERAPW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.