5 Jan 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,000 views6 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
💩3❤1👍1👎1
Channel
ByteSec1401
@ByteSec1401_1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
504subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002122768047 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ByteSec1401_1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ByteSec1401_1 |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 504 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:48 | 505 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 503 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 502 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 502 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 20 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
55 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 27.3% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 23.6% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 10.9% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 9.09% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 3.64% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2024 to 5 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
5 Jan 2026, 15:06 UTC959 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
شهید شوشتری یکی از گروهای وابسته به سپاه پاسداران می باشد که توسط محمد باقر شیرین کار اداره میشود. ایشون از سمت خود برای قلدری و آزار واذیت و تحقیر زنان در محیط کاریش سواستفاده می کند. او از این لذت میبره که به زنهای گروهش شخصا بگه که هیچ ارزشی ندارن و یا بی فایده ان، یا اینکه بین دوستانش به صورت مخفیانه این حرفها رو بزنه. او نه تنها این زنان را با گفتارتوهین آمیزش شکنجه روحی می دهد بلکه دیگر مردان شرکت هم تشویق ب…
👍1👎1
4 Jan 2026, 13:58 UTC759 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
ما همچنان به تلاشهای خود برای کسب اطلاعات بیشتر در مورد سپاه پاسداران ادامه دادیم و اخیرا یه چیز جالبی پیدا کردیم در مورد گروه شهید شوشتری که وابسته به سپاه پاسداران می باشد. به زودی همه درباره اش باخبر می شوند. برای آگاهی بیشتر، ما را در کانال X و تلگرام bytesec1401@ دنبال کنید . We continued our efforts to learn more about the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and recently found something interesting about …
😁2👍1
4 Dec 2025, 16:03 UTC921 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo
واقعا باعث تاسف است دیدن عکسهای بیشتر از زنان ایرانی که روی این پوسترهای تحت تعقیب ظاهر میشوند. آخه چرا بیخودی به خاطر حمایت از سپاه پاسداران خودشون را تو درد سر و خطرمیندازن. این مزدوران تروریست به طور مداوم تلاش می کنند تا حقوق کمی که هنوز زنان ایرانی دارند را به تدریج حذف کنند. در شان زنان ایرانی نیست که عکشون روی این پوسترهای تحت تعقیب باشد به خاطر حمایت کردن از یک مشت مزدور تروریست که اصلا ارزشی برای آنها قائل …
⚡1❤1
21 Sept 2025, 13:23 UTC≈1,180 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
میلا و داده نگار فکر کردن میتونن از دست ما فرار کنن و خودشون رو پنهان کنن و به کارشون که مردم آزاری و حمایت از سپاه پاسداران تروریست هست ادامه بدن . فکر کردن ما متوجه کارهاشون نمیشیم. مهمتراز این فکر کردن که شماها متوجه این موضوع نمیشید. اما تشکر از دوستان همیشگی خودمون، ما به افشاگری اشخاصی همچون میلاد و دیگران به عنوان حمایت کنندگان سپاه تروریست ادمه میدهیم. ما همیشه در حال پیدا کردن اطلاعات جدید هستیم، به اشتراک گ…
🤣2❤1
20 Sept 2025, 15:58 UTC980 views3 reactionsread 24 August 2026
بعد از اینکه برای اولین بار داده نگار را به عنوان دست نشانده سپاه افشا کردیم،خیلی از آنهایی که منظور ما رو درک کردند، آن محل رو ترک کردن و رفتن دنبال کاری که باعث جلوگیری از پیشرفت شخصیشون نمیشه. اما بعد از اینکه دیدیم کارمندان جدید استخدام میکینی، کمی تعجب کردیم.... آقای میلاد بگذارید ازتون این سوال رو بکنم..آیا به کارمندان جدیدتون هنگام خوشامدگویی و آنبوردینگ توضیح میدهید که آنها قراره برای سپاه پاسدارن تروریست کار…
❤2🍌1
19 Sept 2025, 15:09 UTC950 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
زمانی که ما سرمون شلوغ بود با افشاگری دست نشانده سپاهی، دوستانمان به ما خبر دادن که آقای میلاد رهنما و شرکت داده نگارتصمیم گرفتن به حمایت از سپاه ادامه بدن. تازه چی.. دوستای سپاهی احمقش هم فکر کردن میتونن کمکش کنن با قایم موشک بازی و جابه جایی محل کار و بهش اجازه بدن تا به ظلم کردن مردم مظلوم ایران ادامه بده. شاید دوست داشته باشن بدونن نظرشما راجع به آنها چیه؟ یک سری بهشون تو خیابون فریدون خانی بزنید! ما را در ایکس…
❤1🍌1
15 Sept 2025, 18:06 UTC855 views15 reactionsread 24 August 2026
سه سال از قتل مهسا امینی میگذرد و ما هنوز فراموشش نکردیم. ملت ایران او را فراموش نکرده دنیا فراموشش نکرده مهسا همیشه در قلب ملت ایران جاویدان خواهد بود. با اینکه این رژیم با سرکوب و کشتن بی رحمانه سعی میکنه این حرکت را خاموش کند٬ ولی اراده و شور مردم مانند آتش زیر خاکستر همچنان زنده و روشن باقی مانده است. ما از عدالت٬ حقوق بشر و برابری در ایران حمایت می کنیم ما از #زن_زندگی_آزادی حمایت می کنیم #زن_زندگی_آزادی #مهس…
❤7👎4💩2🍌1💔1
4 Mar 2025, 18:49 UTC≈2,020 viewsread 24 August 2026
Because of the IRGC, women will never have freedom. IRGC choose to carry out unnecessary evil, and make us women pay the price. Artemis Ghasemzadeh is a brave Iranian woman who recently has become another victim of IRGC's oppressive ideologies. How long must Iranian women continue to suffer? Shame on IRGC for making Iranian women unsafe and Shame on them for making the world fearful of us. It is very shameful that IR…
4 Mar 2025, 18:48 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 24 August 2026
تا سپاه هست زنان ایران آب خوش از گلوشون پایان نمیره و هیچوقت آزادی ندارند آتش به اختیار بودن سپاه برای شر غیر ضروری، به قیمت جون زنان ایران که ما زنان باید هزینشو بدیم. خانم آرتمیس قاسمزاده یک شیر زن ایرانی هست که اخیرا یکی دیگر از قربانیان ایدْولوژی ظلم سپاه شده. آخه دیگه تا چه حد این زنان ایران باید این رنج وبدبختی رو تحمل کنند. ننگ بر سپاه برای گرفتن امنیت از زنان ایرانی و ننگ بر آنها برای بدبین کردن ما در سراسر …
25 Nov 2024, 16:41 UTC≈3,100 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026
While we’ve been busy exposing these incompetent IRGC members, the followers of our movement have been busy making new channels to keep you informed. Give them a follow! https://t.me/ByteSec1401_Efshagari https://t.me/ByteSec1401_Ahkbare_Dagh
🎉1
25 Nov 2024, 16:39 UTC≈3,080 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026
هنگامی که ما سرمون شلوغ بود با افشا کردن این سپاهیای بیعرضه مخاطبان عزیز جنبش ما مشغول ساختن و راه اندازی یه کانالهای جدید برای اطلاع رسانی به شما بودن... در اینجا میتوانید آنها را دنبال کنید https://t.me/ByteSec1401_Efshagari https://t.me/ByteSec1401_Ahkbare_Dagh
💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ByteSec1401_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خبرگزاری سایبربان| Cyberban News
@cyberbannews_ir · 109,325
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
@cyberbannews_ir · 109,325
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ByteSec1401” (@ByteSec1401_1), 504 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ByteSec1401_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.