Channel
@Burn_Krypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002225725335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Burn_Krypto |
| Description | хотим изменить этот мир |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 1 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Burn_Krypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 54 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 54 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
21 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 47.6% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2024 to 5 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Идея, которая меняет все: мой путь к свободе и жизни на островах 🌴 Привет всем! Сегодня хочу поделиться своими мыслями и планами. Этот канал постепенно превращается в нечто большее, чем просто история о вариантов заработка. Для меня это не просто блог, а пространство, где я рассказываю о своем пути, своей жизни и целях, которые хочу достичь. У меня есть большая мечта: начать следующий год на теплом острове в Таилан…
👎4
Сегодня хочу поделиться важным уроком: не все игры, которые выглядят перспективными, действительно могут приносить прибыль. Мы здесь, чтобы узнать, как зарабатывать на криптовалюте и Mini Apps, но иногда ожидания далеки от реальности. Вот примеры из моего опыта. Когда я только начинал, Hamster Combat казалась отличным вариантом для заработка. Игра была популярной, и многие ожидали, что ее токен вырастет в цене. Но, …
👍3
Привет, друзья! 🤗 Я понимаю, что долго ничего не публиковал, но это время было не зря. Я изучал различные способы заработка и понял, что тапалки — не для меня. Недавно я нашел действительно стоящий источник дохода, и у меня был наставник, который помог мне понять все нюансы. Скоро я расскажу вам, на чем же я зарабатываю. Оставайтесь на связи — будет интересно! Еще остались люди, дайте реакцию 🔥
🔥3👍1
Как давно вы в крипте?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
Signed Winget Toretto
Принимайте участие в допах тон, тут вам дают монеты и вы должны их поставить за места от 1-50 дают тон!! https://t.me/Drop2DropBot?start=ref_6492
👍1
Signed Winget Toretto
@weqsan
Signed weqsan | Burn🦴
отпишите в личку пожалуйста те кто готов обменять ton на мои usdc
Signed weqsan | Burn🦴
Принимаю в свою Тиму по трафику можно ллить откуда угодно,также за каждого человека получите по 0.5-0.7☺️ https://t.me/+6ad_0vB2yE42NzZi
👍1
Signed Winget Toretto
Кто хочет майнить ☺️ для вас есть ещё один майнер http://t.me/FarmingUSDT_bot/?start=REF6597375218 Тут на пасивке вы будете получать доход. Вывод от 0.05☺️
Signed Dima | Burn🦴
https://t.me/TONMine_R0bot?start=6597375218
Signed Dima | Burn🦴
Хотите тонов заработать так что есть майнер
Signed Dima | Burn🦴
Доброе утро
👍3
Signed Dima | Burn🦴
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Burn_Krypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как давно вы в крипте?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2024 to 5 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 881,458 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡️EVGENIY INVESTOR / ARBITRAGE” (@Burn_Krypto), 54 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Burn_Krypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.