Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 341–411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 09:40
403
+1
29 Sept 2026, 17:21
402
+36
15 Sept 2026, 13:21
366
+4
7 Sept 2026, 14:16
362
+7
29 Aug 2026, 14:27
355
+5
16 Aug 2026, 20:14
350
+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:48
349
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:30
349
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
158 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
122
77.2%
🔥
23
14.6%
🍌
6
3.80%
🌭
4
2.53%
💯
2
1.27%
👌
1
0.633%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🌟
This Kishu is finally ready to cause trouble at conventions!! And Bolt is also the first example of our new TPU-base. Modelled after our drawings and past heads.
He features;
🌟Magnetic eyelids and tongue
🌟Handpaws with finger escapes
🌟Indoor & Outdoor feetpaws with hidden zipper for easy washing
🌟Curltail with kidneybelt
🌟All seams are sewn with extra strong sailor's thread
🌟Extra armsleeves
🌟Custom coll…
We're currently deep in preparations for GDAkon! Here you can see unassembled bulldog & muzzle harnesses. At the same time we're stocking up our new product, will be revealed soon 🙂
If you were to buy a fursuit harness, which material and colour do you prefer the straps to be? (Multiple choice)
Nylon straps48%
Cotton straps29%
Neon/saturated colours57%
Normal colours43%
Desaturated/natural colours27%
The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🌟🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🌟
Meet the green cat! He's always ready to rumble 🌟
🌟Handcarved foam head
🌟Pockets in head and digilegs
🌟Zip on feetpaws
🌟Strap system to keep the legs up
🌟Tail attached to a kidney belt for extra comfort
🌟Sewn in paddings with zipper to remove stuffing
Made with BigZ and HowlFabric faux fur.
He is a 3/4th Fursuit; Head, Handpaws, Feetpaws, Digilegs, Tail and Armsleeves
🌟Got any questions? Comment them
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @BunsAndBacon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
If you were to buy a fursuit harness, which material and colour do you prefer the straps to be? (Multiple choice)
Nylon straps48%
Cotton straps29%
Neon/saturated colours57%
Normal colours43%
Desaturated/natural colours27%
The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔮 Buns and Bacon Cave” (@BunsAndBacon), 403 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BunsAndBacon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.