Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @EliteSignal_Vip. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far below this size band
225 average views per post against 1,052,435 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.021%. Across the 392 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,001,501–14,188,780 subscribers — the middle half sit between 0.876% and 7.54%, with a median of 2.78%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured
1,916 of 1,916 published in the window (1,914 exact, 2 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
430,509
Mature posts only
0.023% over 1,773 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_low, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -59,690. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,043,482–1,121,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 02:21
1,052,435
-3,651
15 Sept 2026, 23:38
1,056,086
-2,868
14 Sept 2026, 10:19
1,058,954
-2,056
12 Sept 2026, 19:21
1,061,010
-3,613
10 Sept 2026, 19:02
1,064,623
-3,806
7 Sept 2026, 17:38
1,068,429
-5,216
4 Sept 2026, 21:38
1,073,645
-3,655
3 Sept 2026, 06:44
1,077,300
-1,958
1 Sept 2026, 21:54
1,079,258
-1,921
31 Aug 2026, 19:55
1,081,179
-1,362
30 Aug 2026, 17:34
1,082,541
-939
29 Aug 2026, 20:47
1,083,480
-860
28 Aug 2026, 23:28
1,084,340
-1,227
27 Aug 2026, 21:09
1,085,567
-1,119
26 Aug 2026, 21:34
1,086,686
-938
25 Aug 2026, 22:23
1,087,624
-1,031
25 Aug 2026, 01:08
1,088,655
-1,926
23 Aug 2026, 12:22
1,090,581
-1,857
22 Aug 2026, 00:17
1,092,438
-2,231
20 Aug 2026, 16:25
1,094,669
first reading
Engagement
2,078 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.021%
avg views ÷ 1,052,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
225
1,916 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.324%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,916
of 2,078 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 251 of 1,916 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
2,078 (30 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
430,652
Reactions total
239
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,340
Videos
≈34
Links
≈1,560
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 1,755 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (1,047 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 1,742 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 3.4 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 40.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 77.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 166 views — 0.016% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 280).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 52 interp. → 3.0 hours: 85 → 6.0 hours: 152 → 12 hours: 199still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
4.3 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 66 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
62
83.8%
🔥
5
6.76%
🎉
4
5.41%
👍
2
2.70%
🥰
1
1.35%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 September 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وقتی حرفی میزنم و سیگنال میدم یعنی ردخور نداره، اینجا میتونی با یه سیگنال به اولین میلیارد زندگیت برسی و یا فقط نظاره گر موفقیت بقیه باشی ! 🤩💎
📱 آموزش سرمایه گذاری⏩
560 برابر شد میم کوینمون در کمتر از 12 ساعت و این بی سابقه بود 😲🔥
من هیچی نگم بهتره دیگه خودتون سود بچه ها و رشد میم کوین رو دارین میبینین 😎
اینه قدرت و تجربه چندین ساله من 🙄
باعث افتخارمه که توی این شرایط خوشحالی رو به خونه هاتون میارم ❤️
یه جوری به سمت هدفت قدم بردار که چشمای همه رو به خودت خیره کنی 🩵
واقعا همچین فرصتی خیلی کم پیش میاد پس باید ازش استفاده کرد حواستون باشه مجدد میگم تارگت فروش ما 0.01 دلاره تا اونموقع میتونید با خیال راحت خرید بزنید 🤩✌️
اگه کنارم باشی و سیگنال های منو در نظر بگیری، مسیرت رو به سمت اهدافت عوض میکنی و با کمک من و لطف خداوند به هرچی بخوای میرسی ❤️🔥
خودم هم تعجب کردم وقتی دیدم اینقدر سود داد خوشحالم برای اونایی که با من موفق به خرید شدن 😍
تارگت فروش ما 0.01 هست تا به این قیمت برسه موقعیت خرید دارید 🔥✅
کمتر از یک ساعت سرمایم 7 برابر شد 😍
در حال حاضر این میم کوین 33792% درشد کرده و این تازه اول راهه از خدا سپاس گذارم که جلو همه سر بلندم کرد 🥰
👈 خرید مستقیم 👉
💳آموزش سرمایه گذاری💳
⭐️1 IMBBU = $0.001520⚡️
واقعا توقع نداشتم اینقدر رشد کنه خیلی خوشحال اطمینان دارم به راحتی قیمتش به 0.01 میرسه
خدایا شکرت جلو همه سر بلندم کردی 😍
👈 خرید مستقیم 👉
💳آموزش سرمایه گذاری💳
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,078 posts we hold for @BtcLob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 11 September 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علیرضا کالجی | تحلیل سیگنال| تحلیل کریپتو |” (@BtcLob), 1,052,435 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BtcLob.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
