Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

علیرضا کالجی | تحلیل سیگنال| تحلیل کریپتو |

@BtcLob

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,106,219subscribers

-5,906 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001069936300
TypeChannel
Username@BtcLob
Descriptionپیشنهادات اقتصادی و سرمایه گذاری دلاری 💸 کانال رسمی ما @Alireza_Kalej چشمت به این باشه که خدا بده نه بنده خدا ❤️
CreatedBetween 1 June 2016 and 30 June 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BtcLob

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Mehraabi_VIP/602631 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC@BtcLob/8776 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC1.005 days
@Mehraabi_VIP/60331 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC@BtcLob/8764 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@Mehraabi_VIP/60362 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC@BtcLob/8767 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC1.00under a minute
@Mehraabi_VIP/60373 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC@BtcLob/8768 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@Mehraabi_VIP/60383 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC@BtcLob/8769 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@Mehraabi_VIP/60394 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC@BtcLob/8770 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Mehraabi_VIP11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (92)
@EliteSignal_Vip11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (83)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @EliteSignal_Vip. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,106,2191,112,1251,109,1727 August 2026 — 1,112,125 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,112,125 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,111,436 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,110,355 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,109,007 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,107,517 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,106,219 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -5,906. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,105,333–1,113,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:551,106,219-1,298
11 Aug 2026, 06:321,107,517-1,490
10 Aug 2026, 05:381,109,007-1,348
9 Aug 2026, 03:531,110,355-1,081
8 Aug 2026, 06:071,111,436-689
7 Aug 2026, 16:001,112,125no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:531,112,125first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.054%
avg views ÷ 1,106,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
597
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.263%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held47 (30 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total28,038
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,000
Videos
34
Links
1,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

Computed from 27 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 14of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 8.9 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 18.2% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 52.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 323 views0.029% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 378).

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/880612 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC856 minutes5.5 hours old152 viewsno reaction reading60 minutes: 78 interp.3.0 hours: 123still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h56 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
/880512 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC870 minutes5.7 hours old151 viewsno reaction reading3.0 hours: 121 interp.6.0 hours: 151still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h75 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/880412 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC873 minutes5.8 hours old182 viewsno reaction reading3.0 hours: 152 interp.6.0 hours: 182still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h73 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
/880312 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC912 minutes6.1 hours old156 viewsno reaction reading60 minutes: 59 interp.3.0 hours: 1286.0 hours: 156still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h77 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/880212 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC1214 minutes7.3 hours old194 viewsno reaction reading60 minutes: 543.0 hours: 149 interp.6.0 hours: 184still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/880112 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC1230 minutes7.5 hours old225 viewsno reaction reading60 minutes: 58 interp.3.0 hours: 1816.0 hours: 215still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/880012 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC1237 minutes7.6 hours old209 viewsno reaction reading60 minutes: 80 interp.3.0 hours: 1716.0 hours: 200still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/879912 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC1239 minutes7.7 hours old210 viewsno reaction reading60 minutes: 84 interp.3.0 hours: 1756.0 hours: 202still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4097.6%
🔥12.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC152 viewsread 12 August 2026

❗رفقا فرصت ها منتظر هیچ کس نمی‌مونند. 🚨 هر لحظه‌ای که دست به دست کنید ممکن هست این شانس بزرگ زندگی‌تون رو از دست دهید . 📣هرچه زودتر بخرید سودتون بیشتر خواهد بود پس عجله کنید !

12 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC151 viewsread 12 August 2026

🔹 بالاخره پروژه‌ خفن‌مون معرفی شد برید خرید هاتون رو ثبت کنیم ؛ خودم هم برم واسه خرید .🚀😘

12 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC182 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💸 $LOPO —The Meme King on TON A powerful meme coin built on TON Strong community Listed and ready to dominate the charts 🧾 Contract EQAUumZjfuw2HgvXAXIQXojzInYXINMYkP9_JSxGroR3DsG3 🛒 Buy on DeDust

12 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC194 viewsread 12 August 2026

🪙از فرصت استفاده همگی آماده باشید ؛ کمتر از یک ساعت برای ورود به همچنین پروژه خفنی که کانال روسی انفجار‌شو پیشنهاد دادند فرصت باقی‌مانده است . ❗این موقعیت میتواند زندگی شما رو زیر رو کنید پس استفاده کنید ازش 🚀 مخلص شما 😘✨

12 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC225 viewsread 12 August 2026

🔹طبق اعلامات رسمی کانال روسی‌مون معرفی تاخیر خورده و به ساعت 21:00 تغییر یافته.

12 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC209 viewsread 12 August 2026

🔹فعلا منتظر اعلام کانال روسی‌مون هستیم ‼️

12 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC295 viewsread 12 August 2026

❗چنل آموزشی‌مون رو حتما داشته باشید و طبق توضیحات گام به گام پیش برید. 🗣تون 🪙 بخرید و به تون‌کیپر منتقل کنید تا پروژه‌مون رو ضمن معرفی به موقع ورود بزنیم و جا نمونیم ‼️

12 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC327 viewsread 12 August 2026

🔹قابل توجه عزیزانی که تازه به جمع ما اضافه شدند‼️ 📇تیم نهنگ‌هایروسی اعلام کردند که میم‌کوین منتخب قرار هستراس ساعت 19 بهوقت ایران معرفی شود.😊 ⚪️لازم به ذکر است شما باید برای ورود به همچین پروژه‌ای TON 🪙بخرید و به TonKeeper منقل کنید و برای ساعت 19:00 آماده باشید . 🪙درضمن محتوای خرید تون 🏷️ و انتقال رو می‌توانید از طریق چنل آموزشی دنبال کنید .🚀

12 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC267 viewsread 12 August 2026

❗طبق تجربیاتی که من طی چندین سال از این پروژه‌ها داشتم این بود که رشد اصلی همان چند دقیقه اول خواهد بود به دلیل اینکه بازار در همین لحظه گیج خواهد بود . 🗣در ذهن داشته باشید که اینجا ثانیه ها برامون پول‌سازی میکنند و تو این داستان حتی یک دقیقه هم دیر بمونی سود پریده ! 🚀پس نتیجه این هست که ساعت 19:00 ورود رو بزن که از سود عقب نمونی!

12 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC264 viewsread 12 August 2026

🔹بالاخره زمان معرفی بزرگترین پروژه تاریخ میم‌کوین ها از طرف کانال روسی اعلام گردید.🚀🗣 🏆طبق اعلامات رسمی کانال روسی امروز یعنی چهارشنبه راس ساعت 19:00 به وقت ایران خواهد بود. ‼️کمتر از 12 ساعت برای معرفی همچین پروژه‌ای زمان باقی مانده‌است. ☑️همگی هرچه سریع‌تر آمادگی های خود رو اعم از خرید TON🪙 و انتقال به تونکیپر 🪙 رو داشته باشید ؛ چون مهم این هست که ورودمون رو زودتر ثبت کنیم .

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @BtcLob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTCAnonymous Poll48 voters

یه فرصت خفن پیدا کردم معرفی کنم؟ 🔴

  1. اره استاد85%
  2. نه استاد من رفتم مسافرت با سود قبلی17%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“علیرضا کالجی | تحلیل سیگنال| تحلیل کریپتو |” (@BtcLob), 1,106,219 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BtcLob.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.