Channel
@BruteXvideo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
75subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001947127244 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BruteXvideo |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 2 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BruteXvideo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 75 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 76 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 79 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 79 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
❔ How long will it take you to find $1,754? 💻 I spent 22 hours or 80 million checks to find 2069 MATIC 🟣 Although some people may take months to accumulate such an amount, we can constantly find wallets with similar amounts 💰 Find wallets with me▶@SUPPORT
+$501🔸 For new subscribers, such videos are useful⚡️ You can see the entire withdrawal process. Find wallets with me▶@SUPPORT
I usually don't sell Ethereum🔹 when I find it. I'm trying to accumulate as much of it as possible for the next big growth!📈 I advise anyone who finds Ethereum and Bitcoin not to exchange them, but to accumulate them.💰 Find wallets with me▶@SUPPORT
Video of how I withdraw 💵 to my wallet. I will record such videos more often⚡️ Find wallets with me▶@SUPPORT
Withdrawal of ETH🔹 to my wallet. Today's finding pleased.💵 I wish everyone such work!😎 Find wallets with me▶@SUPPORT
+$480 💰 I will often make similar videos about how I withdraw money from wallets. 💰 It will be useful for new users! 😎 Find wallets with me ▶ @SUPPORT
+$549🔹 Just see how EASY it is.🔥 Where else is it possible?! Find wallets with me▶@SUPPORT
🔥How I found 0.75 Ethereum 🔹 0.75 Ethereum = $1180 💲 - This is simply amazing! The most valuable results come from personal experience. So, instead of just counting the potential profits in your head, START COUNTING THE MONEY IN YOUR HANDS AND LET REALITY SPEAK FOR ITSELF 💰 To purchase contact▶@SUPPORT
💰0.03 = $852 While others are immersed in mining or trading, wasting their precious time and fretting their nerves, I am simply withdrawing coins that have long been forgotten in forgotten wallets for various reasons 💰 In my opinion this is the ideal solution 🤑 Find wallets with me▶@SUPPORT
💰0.028 = $744 BITCOIN is already in my wallet💰 Find wallets with me ▶ @SUPPORT
+$559 🔹 I have already withdrawn Ethereum 💰 Software is like a positive addiction, If you try it, you won't be able to stop searching for wallets.😅 Find wallets with me▶@SUPPORT
🔹0.72 = $1119 "You have to give up who you were in order to become who you want to be." 💸 Find wallets with me ▶ @SUPPORT
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BruteXvideo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 873,018 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BruteXvideo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BruteX | Video Findings” (@BruteXvideo), 75 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BruteXvideo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.