Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЕЩКЕРЕЕЕЕЕЕ

Channel

ЕЩКЕРЕЕЕЕЕЕ

@Bruh_cringe666

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

156subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003036127940
TypeChannel
Username@Bruh_cringe666
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bruh_cringe666

Growth

137156146.510 August 2026 — 137 subscribers11 August 2026 — 142 subscribers17 August 2026 — 156 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:34156+14
11 Aug 2026, 01:43142+5
10 Aug 2026, 02:31137first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.6%
avg views ÷ 156 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (27 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total2,331
Reactions total442
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

442 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524487837956336664011826.7%
custom 52557662977523993689922.4%
custom 52581687521339106594911.1%
custom 52445834312742488614710.6%
custom 6039419708388676853449.95%
custom 5242360781403599300327.24%
custom 5341808322485978809327.24%
custom 5242637506146487621194.30%
custom 524471766618211661820.452%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 442reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC68 views36 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Говорят, что когда на канале стукнет 150 подписчиков, будет лота на 300 робуксов. Но это лишь слухи... Или нет? 🧐 • • @Bruh_cringe666

custom 525576629775239936816custom 52448783795633666409custom 52581687521339106599custom 52447176661821166181custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

8 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC73 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я и мои три какашки @Kisikimoyajisn @Unnersurenot @TheH31L

custom 525816875213391065912custom 52557662977523993686custom 53418083224859788092custom 52447176661821166181

Signed 𝓦𝓮𝓵𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓽𝓸 𝓓𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶.

7 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC82 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Всё я спаипараввжжьеуо пак

custom 524458343127424886113custom 52423607814035993001custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝓦𝓮𝓵𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓽𝓸 𝓓𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶.

7 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC82 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну жарко типа сдохнуть можн

custom 524487837956336664020custom 52445834312742488616custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝓦𝓮𝓵𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓽𝓸 𝓓𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓶.

6 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC91 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#Doodle Я сделала ей реф, но мне слишком стыдно раскрывать лор. Поэтому просто зацените книжечку <3

custom 525576629775239936813custom 603941970838867685310custom 52448783795633666406custom 52581687521339106594custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

5 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC99 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зацените деваху йоу

custom 52557662977523993683custom 53418083224859788092custom 52423607814035993001

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

5 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC89 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @akiuo0Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 привяу!! начинающий художник, меня зовут аки и я пытаюсь рисовать.. 🤍рисую разных персонажей из игр, а так же придумываю своихх -пока что работы могут быть не очч потому что рисую пальчиком на телефоне..прастите :_ для вопросов и предложений лс @Agro_pon6

custom 52448783795633666407custom 52581687521339106592custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

5 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC110 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#Doodle Тв кв голое тело??? Пропустите пост если толстые персонажи вызывают у вас отвращение и мозги мне не делайте, ок 😪 Наконец-то нарисовала ей нормальный полнорост

custom 603941970838867685312custom 52448783795633666408custom 52581687521339106598custom 52445834312742488612custom 52557662977523993682custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

4 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC111 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @rarororiraPhoto

перва кмм для @TheH31L 🪱 🐏 #commission 🤩

custom 524487837956336664011custom 525576629775239936810custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

4 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC118 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @TransFarmersPhoto

Камишкин для @TheH31L уже СО СЧЕТУ СБИЛАСЬ КАКОЙ!!!! СПАСИБО ЗА ЗАКАЗ💋

custom 525576629775239936814custom 53418083224859788096

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC136 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#ЩП ИЗМ: А всё забейте, забрали всех)0))

custom 52448783795633666406custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

3 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC144 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Боты потеряли свою креативность, жаль

custom 524236078140359930019custom 52581687521339106593custom 60394197083886768533custom 53418083224859788091

Signed 𝖵𝖺𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝖽 ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Bruh_cringe666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 750,570 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЕЩКЕРЕЕЕЕЕЕ” (@Bruh_cringe666), 156 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bruh_cringe666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.