Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BronyaVfx®️

@BronyaVFX

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002312080672
TypeChannel
Username@BronyaVFX
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BronyaVFX

Growth

12710 Aug 2026, 00:17 — 127 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 23:08 — 127 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 00:1710 Aug 2026, 23:08
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:08127no change
10 Aug 2026, 00:17127first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

313 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544283384743777173312539.9%
custom 54384758343168345287524.0%
custom 54406617106774906796019.2%
custom 54563413048353264775316.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2025 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 17 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BronyaVFX. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2025 to 16 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Apr 2026, 21:48 UTC146 viewsread 10 August 2026

Ебашу на заводе зп 20к₽ в год, вот только интернет оплатил, а у вас как дела?

9 Dec 2025, 14:31 UTC352 views11 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пока что чил 🌟

custom 54406617106774906798custom 54428338474377717333

26 Oct 2025, 11:24 UTC525 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

#вардозхуесос

custom 54406617106774906796custom 54428338474377717334custom 54563413048353264771

23 Oct 2025, 03:14 UTC544 views35 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Работа простая 25 реакций =проект 😵‍💫👅

custom 544283384743777173322custom 54384758343168345287custom 54563413048353264776

17 Oct 2025, 15:02 UTC404 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @loramonster

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrZUiNU-s0M падежите молодого стартапера

custom 54406617106774906792

17 Sept 2025, 03:57 UTC542 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Бля ебаный лейм 🖕 якобы сливает мои проекты 🚨 которые в открытом доступе, ебанько отмечай автора, и не вырезай нейм 🕺

custom 544283384743777173310custom 54563413048353264772

16 Aug 2025, 13:10 UTC679 views34 reactions8 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

Богатый Амир 💵 50 реакция = проджект 🖱

custom 543847583431683452818custom 54428338474377717337custom 54406617106774906796custom 54563413048353264773

26 Jul 2025, 11:33 UTC≈1,080 views27 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

Она умная 🚬

custom 545634130483532647714custom 54428338474377717337custom 54384758343168345286

22 Jul 2025, 13:18 UTC828 views46 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

50 реактов = проджект 🤮 Она колит оземпик 🤤

custom 544283384743777173328custom 544066171067749067910custom 54384758343168345288

14 Jul 2025, 10:26 UTC773 views41 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

30 реакций = проджект RR 👼✨

custom 543847583431683452824custom 54563413048353264779custom 54406617106774906796custom 54428338474377717332

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BronyaVFX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 202,282 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BronyaVfx®️” (@BronyaVFX), 127 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BronyaVFX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.