Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

British Democrats

@British_Democrats

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

873subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357910053
TypeChannel
Username@British_Democrats
Created21 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/British_Democrats

Growth

8738778756 August 2026 — 877 subscribers6 August 2026 — 877 subscribers12 August 2026 — 873 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 872–878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:23873-4
6 Aug 2026, 14:32877no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:55877first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 873 subscribers
Avg views / post
139
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (31 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,951
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4938.6%
👏4535.4%
🤬118.66%
😎75.51%
💯64.72%
🆒32.36%
💔32.36%
👌21.57%
👍10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC13 viewsread 6 August 2026

New CCTV shows 'Covent Garden attacker' walking away from scene after 'stabbing men with scissors' According to an eye witness, the attacker was a Romanian crack addict! https://video.dailymail.com/video/mol/2026/08/06/8679469756019291174/1024x576_MP4_8679469756019291174.mp4 https://www.dailymail.com/video/news/video-3692961/Video-Bystanders-stabbed-knifewoman-heart-Covent-Garden.html

5 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Raising the Kai 🇬🇧 Councillor Chris Bateman on the campaign trail Clacton.

👏3💔3

5 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC89 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Out and about in the Alverthorpe and Wrenthorpe areas of Wakefield today, delivering these leaflets to local residents. We’re continuing to expand our reach across the district, so keep an eye out for yours!

🔥7

5 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC93 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Campaign boards are going up across the Clacton constituency! ​We are taking a firm stand against demographic replacement to protect our identity, heritage and culture. ​Make your voice heard on Thursday, 13th August. Vote Kai Stephens. ​#Kai4Clacton | Website | Join | Donate | X | FB | YT |

👏9🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC134 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

One of our canvassing teams is on the ground in Clacton today alongside candidate Kai Stephens, speaking directly with local residents. ​While rival candidates refuse to address the pressing reality of demographic replacement, we are putting this crucial issue front and center in our campaign.

👏12🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC379 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

There are 15 foreign languages, many of them non-european, on the reverse of this NHS appointment letter! Research shows that the NHS spends approximately £64 million to £75.5 million per annum on verbal, audio and written language services - largely funded by YOUR taxation and YOUR National Insurance payments! Freedom of Information (FOI) data indicates that annual expenditure reached £64 million across recorded N

🤬11

3 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

North Belfast Great to be out in the community today, delivering leaflets throughout the Skegoneill Avenue area. Huge respect to the team for the relentless activism in the region.

🔥6

3 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC106 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

After years of hesitation, Reform UK has finally attempted to adopt our policy to deploy the Royal Navy in the English Channel to intercept illegal crossings. But stopping the boats alone won't reverse demographic change. To secure our nation’s future and ensure our grandchildren remain the majority in their homeland, we need a serious, practical remigration policy now. The question is: Will Reform UK reverse the di

🔥8

2 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC207 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Our members are currently leafleting around Dee Street in East Belfast. ​The mural on the wall sums it up perfectly: this is what our children need to secure a British future. Support our hardworking volunteers by joining us. Hit the link below ⬇️ | Website | Join | Donate | X | FB | YT |

💯6👏3

1 Aug 2026, 20:56 UTC199 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Delivered over 1,100 leaflets around the Beersbridge Road area in East Belfast today, standing in solidarity with local Woodcot Avenue residents opposing HMOs in our community.

👏8🔥3

1 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC124 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Superb new placards have arrived. Keep an eye out for these in Clacton! Vote Kai Stephens, British Democrats. He is the only candidate on the ballot paper who is prepared to put British people first, stop immigration, and prevent demographic replacement. It is our grandchildren's future that's at stake! Help us keep pushing the campaign forward by joining us today: https://britishdems.co.uk/join/

😎7🔥2👍1

31 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC147 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Northern Ireland New members taking part in a leafleting session in and around the Irish Street and Lincoln Courts areas of Londonderry. The team received an excellent reception on the doorsteps from the residents we spoke with.

🔥13

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @British_Democrats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 281,829 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“British Democrats” (@British_Democrats), 873 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/British_Democrats.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.