Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

♡Britasha.Biser♡

@BritashaBiser

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

278subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002324192824
TypeChannel
Username@BritashaBiser
Descriptionлс автора : @evqlla лс админов : @Oksanabiser @Aneekkx @taxx_wed @RischaIrischa лайф канал : https://t.me/+4hpD9jka5ZQ2ZjZi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BritashaBiser

Growth

2786 Aug 2026, 21:34 — 278 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:30 — 278 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 21:346 Aug 2026, 23:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 277–279 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:30278no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:34278first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.9%
avg views ÷ 278 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.2
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (30 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,580
Reactions total164
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,260
Videos
3
Links
136

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9356.7%
custom 53549034673180619572917.7%
💋159.15%
💘116.71%
custom 528985073301169366395.49%
🎄42.44%
🦄31.83%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC23 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветики Наконец-то представляю вам котика на тест @RischaIrischa 🥰. Схемка платная) Спасибо ей большое за тестик, фигурка милашная 😍 Давайте оценочку От Оксаны

custom 53549034673180619576🦄1custom 52898507330116936631

Signed ♡◝◝⁠ 🎄↓|↑ ⁠❛🐱♪Ⲟⲕⲋⲁⲛⲁ🌌〃🦊✧•^🍓·❄️

6 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC12 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SpiderBeadsYasPhoto

Всем привет! Первая тестировщица ( @Az_al_ya - @BiserAzalia ) уже закончила Диппера и Мейбл, поэтому я хочу поставить 👻👻👻👻 до выхода схемы Итак, цель - 870 подписчиков на моем канале (на момент написания поста 812 ) Добить цель нужно успеть до 18 августа включительно, в противном случае схема будет платной Схема выйдет не раньше 13 августа (срок тестировщиков)

3custom 52898507330116936631custom 53549034673180619571

3 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC56 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bisirix152Photo

а вот и подошел к концу тест на слоника! у всех работки получились очень красивые 🥰 вот их юзы и каналы @rinysa / @bys1nk3 @evqlla / @BritashaBiser @Danya0330 / @loomluck @Kristina_sokolova2/@kristina_sokol_shop @anqwestrd / @slipibeds @a_irtinw / @airin_beads схемка на слоника 🐘 ⬇️ ⬇️

6🦄2custom 52898507330116936631custom 53549034673180619571

2 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC89 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

НАКОНЕЦ-ТО ВЫ ЭТО ВИДИТЕ Я СМОГЛА ВЫЛЕЗЬТИ ИЗ КНИГИ НА 5 МИНУТ 🥕🥕🥕🥕🥕🥕🥕🥕🥕 С выдрочкой от Ангела😳 ‼️Плела на тест ‼️Сплела за 5 часов 30 минут (где-то), я засекала время, но посеяла результат, говорю примерно, вообщем, за 1 день сплести возможно ‼️Очень нравится😳 Схема скоро выйдет в общий доступ, ждите❤️ Оценочку☺️ Риша💋

8💋4custom 53549034673180619572

2 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC85 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

как вам такой реф для авторки ? хотели бы увидеть ее от меня ?

5💘4

2 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC78 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Пост Представляю вам цветочного котика на тест @sedastian575 🥰🎀. Спасибо ей огромное за возможность поучаствовать в нём. Схемка платная, инфа на канале автора😎. Поела я эту прекрасную котейку из алебастрового сиреневого бисера, мне очень нравится Давайте оценочку ей От Оксаны

5custom 52898507330116936634custom 53549034673180619571

Signed ♡◝◝⁠ 🎄↓|↑ ⁠❛🐱♪Ⲟⲕⲋⲁⲛⲁ🌌〃🦊✧•^🍓·❄️

2 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC86 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ждите их от меня (⁠・⁠∀⁠・⁠) кое кого уже начала

9

1 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC89 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кот готов,🥰🎀 завтра на улице сфоткаю, сегодня хотела, но из-за плохого освещения не получилось 😔 Так что ждите пост От Оксаны

custom 53549034673180619578💋2

Signed ♡◝◝⁠ 🎄↓|↑ ⁠❛🐱♪Ⲟⲕⲋⲁⲛⲁ🌌〃🦊✧•^🍓·❄️

1 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC90 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

схема уже готова 🫶🏻

4custom 53549034673180619574

1 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC105 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🌸 ••••••••••••••••••••• 🖇Представляю вам милую выдру на тест от @adidad_gk 🖇Схема понятная и очень качественная, кстати скоро выйдет в общий доступ 💕 🖇Сплела за 2 дня если без перерывов) 🖇Мне она очень нравиться, особенно те цвета которые я выбрала 🤩 🖇В руках вместо рыбки я решила сделать акулку •••••••••••••••••••••• Оцениваем)

💋8💘52

Signed 𝓝𝓪𝓼𝓽𝔂𝓾𝓼𝓱𝓪

31 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC109 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

приняла 7 человек , старалась принимать рандомно 🫶🏻 сегодня будет ещё одна ссылка , если будет актив

5🎄4custom 53549034673180619572custom 52898507330116936631

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BritashaBiser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 238,433 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“♡Britasha.Biser♡” (@BritashaBiser), 278 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BritashaBiser.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.