Channel
@BreakingBadPostaggio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
347subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001605632650 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BreakingBadPostaggio |
| Description | Network: @IlNetworkassurdo |
| Created | 19 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BreakingBadPostaggio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 347 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 347 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
196 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 58 | 29.6% | |
| 🤡 | 31 | 15.8% | |
| 🤯 | 25 | 12.8% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 5.61% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 5.10% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 4.59% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 4.59% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 4.08% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 4.08% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 3.06% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 2.55% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 2.04% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.53% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.02% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.51% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Signor White ormai lei è arrivato troppo tardi, ho già giurato fedeltà ad Allah ed al suo profeta Maometto. Suo cognato Hank verrà neutralizzato con l'accusa di islamofobia. Non c'è più nulla che lei possa escogitare, signor White.
🔥5🤡2
Video, posted without a caption
🔥6🤡1
Mi scusi signor White ma ormai come potrei fidarmi di lei? A questo punto sarebbe più credibile Trump se mi dicesse di non essere affatto interessato al petrolio...
⚡2🤡1
Fan medio del nostro canale aspettando che gli admin facciano un post (non arriverà o sarà rubato):
🤡6🙏3🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤯8🤡1
Andiamo Walt, fai un bel sorriso e guarda l'obiettivo! Non vorrai mica lo sterminio totale della tua famiglia? E dai ti sto prendendo in giro rilassati!
😍5🤡1
Signor White dica solo la verità: lei è geloso del fatto che non si poteva scopare le mimic del film
🔥6🤡2👍1😁1
Dannazione Jesse, ma insomma lo vuoi capire che Backrooms fa schifo?! I mostri quasi non ci sono e neanche sono degni di far paura! Il film dà la priorità ad un negro coglione cacciato di casa da sua moglie! E a me non frega un cazzo delle ferite interiori dei personaggi, il film non riesce a sviluppare neanche questo!
👍3🤡2🥰1
Diamine Walt un larp simile non lo immaginavo proprio da te. Cosa dovrebbe interessare della caduta dell'impero romano d'Oriente ad un uomo di mezza età professore di chimica che abita negli Stati Uniti? Torna a cucinare per me che è meglio
🔥11🤡1
Skyler come ti permetti di ricordarmi cose superflue come la nascita di nostra figlia quando oggi è l'anniversario della caduta dell'impero bizantino? Ben 573 anni fa cazzo! Lasciami contemplare questa enorme tragedia dell'occidente in pace
😱9🤡2
Sta tranquillo Walt, certo avrai fatto brutalmente assassinare 10 testimoni in tre prigioni diverse in due minuti, avrai bombardato una casa di riposo, ma io non avrei mai dovuto prenderti in giro o sminuire il tuo ruolo di padre di famiglia. Mi dispiace tanto di averti portato a costruire un vasto impero del narcotraffico, spero che le cose fra noi si risolvano nel migliore dei modi.
🤡4❤3🌚1
Mi scusi Gus, oggi davvero non potrò cucinare. Devo commemorare in silenzio il decimo anniversario della morte di Harambe, una ferita ancora aperta nel mio cuore. Oggi moriva un nostro lontano cugino, che possa riposare in pace e che possa perdonarci per i nostri errori.
😢9🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BreakingBadPostaggio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,298,848 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Breaking Bad assurdo” (@BreakingBadPostaggio), 347 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BreakingBadPostaggio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.