imissyoubratz

Channel
𖣁「 Prestigious Baddies; BratzYins ‧‧ ⟆
@BratzYins
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
74subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002076197454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BratzYins |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 8 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BratzYins |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 74 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 74 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 8 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 54s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
109 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6165852507516963320 | 30 | 27.5% | |
| custom 5260701155045944827 | 19 | 17.4% | |
| custom 6206328159055384894 | 18 | 16.5% | |
| custom 5357563087161401558 | 14 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5357383368549867484 | 11 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5318828903127591846 | 9 | 8.26% | |
| custom 5271844456285355311 | 5 | 4.59% | |
| custom 5318858276408929870 | 3 | 2.75% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2024 to 16 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Kangen bratz 😢
Happy mensive brayz
Look who's back 👀🤫
custom 52607011550459448275custom 61658525075169633203custom 62063281590553848943
(💅) ANNOUNCEMENT Dearest baddies, with this message we wanna inform you that we decided to put @bratzyins on REST MODE. With that, we will not be able to help forwarding your announcement, celebrate your mensive, accepting sfs partner, and other things that we usually do. Please do not unsubscribe this channel, if there's any information that you wanna confirm, please contact us through @bratzyinsbot. With this anno…
custom 61658525075169633207custom 53575630871614015585custom 62063281590553848945custom 52607011550459448274
💅💅💅
P @bratzyins 😝😝
💅💅💅
[HFW] (💅) INKED 07: Bratzyins ── Where community flourishes and dreams find home Step into a world of elegance and exploration as you embark on a journey through our meticulously curated selection of properties👩 Prepare to be captivated as we open the doors to our exclusive Prestigious Open House! 🪽[ https://t.me/+W3-1sJMGij85Nzll ] 🪽 This gathering promises an immersive experience where every moment is brimming w…
custom 53188289031275918466custom 61658525075169633205custom 62063281590553848945
Sticker, posted without a caption
Birthday dumpies ^____^ 🦋🪻🎀
custom 53575630871614015584custom 61658525075169633202custom 53188289031275918461custom 53188582764089298701custom 53573833685498674841custom 62063281590553848941
💅💅💅
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @BratzYins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 422,056 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BratzYins named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𖣁「 Prestigious Baddies; BratzYins ‧‧ ⟆” (@BratzYins), 74 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BratzYins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.