☺️
custom 54720967481156323253custom 53866141085126168502custom 58484408264761079242

Channel
@Brasley13
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
115subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003431900440 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Brasley13 |
| Description | 𐔌՞. .՞𐦯 ᢉ𐭩.ᐟ🍮 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Brasley13 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 115 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 115 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (9 May 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 450 |
| Reactions total | 97 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
462 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5812428586556071231 | 109 | 23.6% | |
| custom 5447597979781329330 | 89 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5265114680619195316 | 82 | 17.7% | |
| custom 5447128136128948387 | 64 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5848440826476107924 | 55 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5265042220225944590 | 23 | 4.98% | |
| custom 5312019902494695337 | 21 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5472096748115632325 | 6 | 1.30% | |
| custom 5341294957929984442 | 5 | 1.08% | |
| custom 5386614108512616850 | 4 | 0.866% | |
| custom 5269680144955511610 | 3 | 0.649% | |
| custom 5472167494816929426 | 1 | 0.216% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 462reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☺️
custom 54720967481156323253custom 53866141085126168502custom 58484408264761079242
Заказ для @damnveil Отзывы/кмм https://t.me/maidx12
custom 581242858655607123110custom 52696801449555116103custom 54720967481156323253custom 53866141085126168502custom 58484408264761079242custom 54471281361289483871custom 54721674948169294261
Заказ для @nettece🌟🌟 🌟 Вы бы знали, как я горжусь этим артом. Я не очень люблю рисовать фоны, но меня попросили, и я не пожалела, что взялась за фон ❤️
custom 544759797978132933014custom 54471281361289483874custom 58484408264761079242
Помните, я вам говорила про видео и о том, что я буду показывать спойлеры? Так вот! Как и обещала!🤩
custom 526511468061919531616custom 58484408264761079245custom 58124285865560712312custom 54471281361289483871
🤩🌟🌟🌟 🌟 Трейт с @Leonoruailin 🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩
custom 544712813612894838712custom 58124285865560712317custom 52651146806191953162custom 53120199024946953372custom 58484408264761079241
Доброе утро, пушистики) Вам маленький набросок для видео в тт/ютуб 😙 Мой процесс по созданию видосика идет активно, буду, наверное, почаще кидать спойлеры о создании видосика ☺️☺️
custom 584844082647610792412custom 581242858655607123110custom 52650422202259445905
Реквест для @damnveil 🌟
custom 526511468061919531617custom 58124285865560712316custom 54475979797813293303custom 52650422202259445901custom 53120199024946953371
Признавайтесь, есть тут такие, которые тоже повторили этот тренд? >:3
custom 526511468061919531612custom 54475979797813293302
Повторяю тренд из тт 😏
custom 531201990249469533714custom 52651146806191953166custom 54475979797813293306custom 53412949579299844422custom 58124285865560712312custom 58484408264761079242custom 54471281361289483871
🤩🤩🤩🤩давно хотела у вас 🤩🤩🤩🤩спросить вам боль- 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ше нравится тонкий 🤩🤩🤩🤩 или толстый лайн? 🍮🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🍀🌟🌟🌟
custom 581242858655607123116custom 52651146806191953167custom 58484408264761079244custom 54471281361289483872custom 52650422202259445901custom 53412949579299844421
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
custom 544759797978132933013custom 58484408264761079248custom 58124285865560712315custom 52651146806191953162custom 52650422202259445901
Спасибо за заказ для @nettece ❤️ Отзывы @maidx12
custom 544759797978132933014custom 58124285865560712318custom 52651146806191953162custom 53120199024946953372custom 52650422202259445901custom 53412949579299844421
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Brasley13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 386,353 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ブラスリーᢉ𐭩.ᐟ🍮” (@Brasley13), 115 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Brasley13.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.