Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bots Of Gamer | Polls

@BotsOfGamerPolls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

190subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001265190507
TypeChannel
Username@BotsOfGamerPolls
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BotsOfGamerPolls

Growth

1901921917 August 2026 — 192 subscribers7 August 2026 — 192 subscribers13 August 2026 — 190 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:15190-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:48192no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:06192first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 May 2025, 13:05 UTC501 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Would you like to see the Auto Join Request Approver in @GroupProtectionsBot? 🔗

  1. Yes89%
  2. No11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Oct 2024, 06:44 UTC865 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Would you like @GuessTheAnswersBot to send the questions in channels too? ℹ️

  1. Yes I like it83%
  2. No, let’s keep it only in groups17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Oct 2024, 06:01 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Would you like an Anagram feature in @FastlyWriteBot?

  1. Yes ✅88%
  2. No ❌12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jul 2024, 16:56 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

🎙 Would you like a function that allow you to use some commands through voice messages?

  1. Yess ✅83%
  2. No, i don't like it ❌17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jun 2024, 23:39 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Would you like to have the possibility to make users pay to join a group in @AuthorizedJoinBot ?

  1. Yes82%
  2. No18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Apr 2024, 11:23 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Would you like to see the @ForceChannelSubscriberBot functions integrated in @GroupProtectionsBot?

  1. Yes85%
  2. No15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Mar 2024, 23:15 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

What do you think about an official BotsOfGamer Minecraft server? (More polls if end well)

  1. I like the idea83%
  2. I don't like the idea17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Dec 2023, 19:45 UTC≈1,840 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

For the pay command of @GTAtgBot

  1. Do it quickly and make sure it is executed immediately.31%
  2. Make it more realistic and have it done like a bank transfer, so it takes a few minutes to transfer.69%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2023, 06:27 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Are you still using @ManageRequestsBot?

  1. Yes59%
  2. No27%
  3. No, it's useless14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jul 2023, 16:16 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Do you want to see a new bot?

  1. Yes72%
  2. No13%
  3. Yes, please i want @FootballTeamManagerBot15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BotsOfGamerPolls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 May 2025, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll112 voters

Would you like to see the Auto Join Request Approver in @GroupProtectionsBot? 🔗

  1. Yes89%
  2. No11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Oct 2024, 06:44 UTCAnonymous Poll132 voters

Would you like @GuessTheAnswersBot to send the questions in channels too? ℹ️

  1. Yes I like it83%
  2. No, let’s keep it only in groups17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Oct 2024, 06:01 UTCAnonymous Poll125 voters

Would you like an Anagram feature in @FastlyWriteBot?

  1. Yes ✅88%
  2. No ❌12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jul 2024, 16:56 UTCAnonymous Poll209 voters

🎙 Would you like a function that allow you to use some commands through voice messages?

  1. Yess ✅83%
  2. No, i don't like it ❌17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jun 2024, 23:39 UTCAnonymous Poll121 voters

Would you like to have the possibility to make users pay to join a group in @AuthorizedJoinBot ?

  1. Yes82%
  2. No18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Apr 2024, 11:23 UTCAnonymous Poll158 voters

Would you like to see the @ForceChannelSubscriberBot functions integrated in @GroupProtectionsBot?

  1. Yes85%
  2. No15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2022 to 27 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 227,713 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

FastlyWrite | News
@FastlyWrite · 7731 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

🇬🇧 Bots Of Gamer | BOG
@BotsOfGamer · 12,33536 posts🇪🇸 Español Bots Of Gamer | BOG
@esBotsOfGamer · 922 postsFastlyWrite | News
@FastlyWrite · 7732 posts🇲🇨 Indonesian Bots Of Gamer | BOG
@idBotsOfGamer · 1422 posts🇮🇹 Italian Bots Of Gamer | BOG
@itBotsOfGamer · 1232 postsGroup Protections News | BOG
@GroupProtections · 3331 postBots Of Gamer | Network
@NetworkBOG · 8131 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Bots Of Gamer | Network
@NetworkBOG · 8131 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bots Of Gamer | Polls” (@BotsOfGamerPolls), 190 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BotsOfGamerPolls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.