Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

📰 BOTFACTORY News

@BotFactoryCRnew

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

235subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003601078373
TypeChannel
Username@BotFactoryCRnew
DescriptionHello 👋 👨‍💻 Onwer: @Egorikvr 🤖 Bot: @BotFactory_Creator_Bot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 17 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/BotFactoryCRnew

Growth

235236235.57 Aug 2026, 19:12 — 236 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:27 — 235 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:02 — 235 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:128 Aug 2026, 10:02
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 235–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:02235no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:27235-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:12236first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 235 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 May 202626 July 2026)
Views total103
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2337.7%
❤‍🔥1118.0%
813.1%
711.5%
👍711.5%
🏆58.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В этом обновлении мы полностью восстановили работу всех интеграций и стабилизировали систему ⚙️ Также добавили новую интеграцию с @mgram_robot — теперь у вас ещё больше возможностей для автоматизации и масштабирования 🚀 Мы провели серьёзную техническую доработку: исправили ошибки, усилили стабильность и вернули корректную работу всех ключевых функций. Система снова работает быстро и надёжно ✅ Можете начинать испо

🔥21

21 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Afonua_kanalPhoto

Возможность зарабатывать без вложений ✅ @Neilkliklak_bot Задания от 10 до 1000р Быстрые выплаты Пробуйте пока доступно

🔥2

12 Jul 2026, 20:45 UTC72 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Afonua_kanalPhoto

Возможность зарабатывать без вложений ✅ @Neilkliklak_bot Задания от 10 до 1000р Быстрые выплаты Пробуйте пока доступно

🏆1👍1

29 Jun 2026, 16:48 UTC127 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💥 Вышло обновление 💥 К сожалению, у некоторых пользователей сейчас могут временно не работать разделы. Причина связана с обновлением логики и интерфейса. Мы уже занимаемся исправлением, и проблема будет устранена завтра в первой половине дня.

2🏆2🔥21

28 Jun 2026, 16:55 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚀 Завтра выходит крупное обновление! Мы добавили бот заданий, 6 сервисов интеграций, улучшили дизайн и работу проекта, а также исправили 362 багa. 🔜 Вскоре ждите вторую волну обновлений

❤‍🔥2👍1

13 Jun 2026, 12:41 UTC181 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В этом месяце выйдет крупное обновление. В котором будут добавлены интеграции с BotoHub/TgRass/Flyer/PiarFlow/HiViews/subgramm/Trafsly + еще другие. Это затронет всех ботов в креаторе. 🔥 - если ждёшь

🔥8🏆1

7 Jun 2026, 09:41 UTC197 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

@BotFactory_Creator_Bot ищет спонсоров на оп Писать @Egorikvr

2

5 Jun 2026, 09:39 UTC174 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Afonua_kanalPhoto

🔔 ❗ВОЗВРАЩЕНИЕ ❗🔔 🫐💈 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗙𝗜𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗫~𝙋𝙍 🫐💈 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🤵‍♂️ 50₽ за друга 🚸 👥0.2₽ за подписку на группу 📣 0.25₽ за подписку на канал 🤖 0.2₽ за переход в бота 👁️ 0.03₽ за просмотр поста 🌐 0.2₽ за Web-бот 📝+задания 🎁 +0.25₽ за бонус 〰️•〰️•〰️•〰️•〰️•〰️•〰️•〰️•〰️ ❗Забери ежедневный бонус 🚀 Вывод от 50₽ 👇жми👇жми👇жми👇жми👇

3 Jun 2026, 11:19 UTC104 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Возникли проблемы в работе бота? Пишите сюда: @Egorikvr. Поможем исправить любые ошибки и баги в кратчайшие сроки Любые ваши жалобы и предложения по улучшению сервиса тоже будем принимать.

❤‍🔥5

27 May 2026, 07:46 UTC396 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

1 покупателю закреп в канале в подарок

👍21

27 May 2026, 07:43 UTC473 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📣 Реклама в Telegram-ботах и канале Живая аудитория, пока места есть. Размещу вашу рекламу в активной Telegram-сети. 🤖 @BotFactory_Creator_Bot — 955 чел. в креаторе — 2976 чел. в ботах 📢 @BotFactoryCRnew — 250 подписчиков 💰 Цены: — Креатор — от 95 р — Боты — 148 р — Канал — 26 р — ЕСЛИ БРАТЬ ПО ОТДЕЛЬНОСТИ = 269 р — Пакет 199 р (экономия 70 р) ⚡ Места ограничены — бронируй сейчас ‼️ 📥 @Egorikvr

❤‍🔥21

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BotFactoryCRnew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,047,357 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📰 BOTFACTORY News” (@BotFactoryCRnew), 235 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BotFactoryCRnew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.