Boremon pinned Deleted message

Channel
Boremon
@Boremon_BSC
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
74subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001696248340 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Boremon_BSC |
| Description | https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xb3dfb39e22a340f50190a9e5ebf7cbd02e19b37 Boremon didn't ask to be born - it's not his fault he looks like this! Join the low tax $BOREMON moonshot fairlaunch today, March 4th |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 18 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Boremon_BSC |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 74 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 74 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:40 | 75 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 539
- Videos
- 57
- Links
- 389
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
124 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 79 | 63.7% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 16.9% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 15.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.806% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2022 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Boremon pinned «There is a Boremon that just launched on ETH. Fred the dev of THE REAL BOREMON has no relation to that project. It is very likely a scam. There is a loser from the community that was obsessed and had anger issues that probably launched. He will likely scam…»
There is a Boremon that just launched on ETH. Fred the dev of THE REAL BOREMON has no relation to that project. It is very likely a scam. There is a loser from the community that was obsessed and had anger issues that probably launched. He will likely scam you. Anyone is free to launch any token they like. However don't pretend your trash project is something the real fred created
🔥2👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥7
Boremon pinned a photo
As an update the cult is cooking. 125X so far! Amazing launch, strong community, and daily development. There will be a paradigm shift of how BSC projects are built. https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xb1de3f43321bb50cf8ca104b87e3da2620b50404 @CultGrow - Channel @CultGrowCommunity - Chat
👍8🔥4❤3
Boremon pinned a photo
Establishing a CULT. $CULTG LP unlocked, no TG group yet. Only alphas buying https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xB1dE3F43321bB50cf8Ca104B87E3DA2620b50404 T.me/cultgrow
👍7
Boremon pinned «Dear Community, For those of you that missed today's AMA, summary is below: - NFT and token staking utility was released - with massive marketing, influencers, buybacks and most importantly - the best community! - Despite incredible efforts from marketing…»
Dear Community, For those of you that missed today's AMA, summary is below: - NFT and token staking utility was released - with massive marketing, influencers, buybacks and most importantly - the best community! - Despite incredible efforts from marketing, the team, shillers and the community, we have been unable to sell out the NFTs. - Furthermore, the majority of NFTs that were minted, were minted from the dev wa…
❤13🤯2😁2👍1😱1
Live stream finished (28 minutes)
Sell Tax changed to 3%
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Boremon_BSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 119,355 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Boremon” (@Boremon_BSC), 74 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Boremon_BSC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.